Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story

Since: Jan 07

Location Shown

#108472 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Can anything evolve on its/ his/ her own without a cause or maker?

Have You stopped Beating your Children,...?







Since: Jan 07

Location Shown

#108473 Jan 30, 2014
a debate at St. Francis College in Brooklyn, at which three men engaged in a lively, literate, and deeply-informed exchange. After they finished and the moderator opened the floor for questions, the usual thing happened. The questioners by and large had no questions. Instead they offered up prolix piles of words that led nowhere in particular. Some sought to show off what they mistook as their own superior knowledge. Others scolded. A few got lost in their own labyrinths. The closest we came to a question was the j’accuse rhetorical jab more or less in the form,“Don’t you agree that you are an ignorant buffoon?”


Yes it's a Copy & Paste so don't get your Panties in a wad,...

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#108474 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> That is why your idiotic nature will never cease. Go on.
Gibberish.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#108475 Jan 30, 2014
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Here you are completely misleading, there is no known process whereby inanimate chemistry
Sorry Bo, but this is where you went wrong. It's not that he's misleading (he isn't), it's just that you're plain and utter wrong.

How many times do you need to be told that chemistry is NOT inanimate?

You can't argue against science when you don't even know what the words mean.

By the way, how is complexity measured? How can you base a conclusion on a premise when you don't even know what it is?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#108476 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Garbage! Now, since you don't have any evidence but mere speculations in disputing the existence of God, you are only lying or guessing. Period.
I dont' have evidence because I didn't make a positive claim. You don't have evidence either, even though you ARE making the positive claim. Therefore YOU have the problem, not me.

I know you didn't even understand what I just said, but it's here for posterity anyway.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#108477 Jan 30, 2014
Discord wrote:
<quoted text>
And British.
This has been going on for several months and it seems that Chuckles is not one for the book earning because it imbalances the lumps he has from being hit across the head with a babble just a few too many times.

He has been shown copious amounts of evidence, which he steadfastly ignores.

This British is English stance is quite new though. Despite the fact that the British government is known not as the English government but the British government.

But hey, the great god Charles has spoken and the great god Charles is not one to change his mind.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#108478 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Another foolish and stupid response.


As if you have even the slightest idea of what was bring discussed.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#108479 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The Fact remains, i am right.
Nope.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#108480 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And again, the people of England are solely called the English, that has always been my stand, and that is the truth. So, who is now the stupid?
Jeezoos fooking christ on a crutch Chaz – WTF is wrong with you?

Tell me are you British?

Well I am and I live here in England and I am not ‘solely’ English, I am British as it says on my officially transcribe by the British government birth certificate, NI, driving licence and passport

So stop trying to diminish my nationality with your pig ignorant silly bugger stupidity.

You are making enemies of British people simply because you have a frigging moronic idea based on ignorance, it’s pathetic and does nothing other than highlight your stupidity

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#108481 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> But the rules and regulations that were spelt out by the Us are followed by all nations, so, by that, they are still in control of the games globally.
{head/desk}

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#108482 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Every one has their different opinions on that. But since evolution stands for change, it do exist, but with the effort of creation power.
Nope. Godbots have their opinion on that.

Just about every one else does not have any such an opinion, they actually know the facts as shown by many separate and independent lines of evidence.

You see this is the difference between opinion and fact

Please provide any (ANY) evidence for you claimed creative power. And by evidence I mean real evidence than can be falsified as opposed to the great god Charles Idemi saying so
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#108483 Jan 30, 2014
bohart wrote:
Here you are completely misleading, there is no known process whereby inanimate chemistry
But while we're here and we've already pointed out why you're wrong here (again), we may as well take care of the rest of your post
bohart wrote:
produces life, reproduction is a characteristic of already existing life!
But how can life produce life when there was no life prior to 4 billion years ago?
bohart wrote:
It has , as I said, nothing to do with life's origin.
And the theory of evolution doesn't have to worry about the origin of life.
bohart wrote:
Next
Already existing life is what's shown to produce life, you want to give the chemicals credit for what an already existing life does, Remember ! we are discussing how the first life arose! For your statement to be true,..." chemistry does in fact produce life" then you need to demonstrate an observable, testable , and repeatable experiment to demonstrate that inanimate chemical processes can create life. That is the scientific process, otherwise it's just a belief or guess.
But all life IS is just chemistry. If you have evidence that it is anything MORE than what is scientifically observed to be chemistry then YOU have to demonstrate that. Otherwise if chemistry can create life today (it can) then there's no reason why it couldn't back then. Of course it's always POSSIBLE that abiogenesis required intervention from an alien or magic Jew, but so far there's zero evidence they're necessary, or even exist. Plus since the universe IS finite, eventually you have no choice BUT to accept that - at some point - life came from non-life.

If you have evidence to the contrary, by all means, present it.

By the way, have you figured out yet how to measure the difference in complexity between a paper plane and a space shuttle?

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#108484 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> But the rules and regulations that were spelt out by the Us are followed by all nations, so, by that, they are still in control of the games globally.
Nickers

Try telling a guy from North Vietnam to follow the rules as laid down by the US, after they had stopped laughing the chances are they would simply shoot you.

For that matter try telling someone from the UK or Mexico or Canada.

You seem to have a very distorted opinion of the influence your country has on the rest of the world.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#108485 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> British or Britain is a term for unity. It comprises of, England or English, Scotland or Scottish and Wales or Welsh. Ok?
Yes so that means that the people of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales are British – OK

The British (note that title) government* seems to think so, the British people seem to think so, all other governments who recognise Britain as a sovereign state (note that all other governments) seem to think so

Therefore I guess you, not being a British citizen or a member of any government are in a minority of one.

* also note that an English government does not exist

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#108486 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You both are wrong. The problem with you guys are just sentiments. What i said, is true. Go on with your thanks. But you can never bend the truth.
Troll.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#108487 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> But the rules and regulations that were spelt out by the Us are followed by all nations, so, by that, they are still in control of the games globally.
Troll.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#108488 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> British or Britain is a term for unity. It comprises of, England or English, Scotland or Scottish and Wales or Welsh. Ok?
Troll.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#108489 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Not really correct. The kingdoms were not formerly known as Uk or Britain, it was after the unity that they became known as that. The people of England were solely known as the English to date, even if they are united under the umbrella of Britain Or British.
Troll.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#108490 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
Discord, do your research on what i just said, and see for yourself. On your response about the language, you are very right. Even if i am gramatically wrong, England can not sue me on/ for my errors.
Troll.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#108491 Jan 30, 2014
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You both are wrong. The problem with you guys are just sentiments. What i said, is true. Go on with your thanks. But you can never bend the truth.
<Sigh>...Our Chuckie....so gloriously unencumbered by intelligence.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 3 min wichita-rick 158,082
Last 3 Letters into 3 new words. (Dec '08) 4 min Red_Forman 56,132
Add a word and drop a word (Jan '14) 5 min Red_Forman 2,556
***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Jan '10) 6 min Red_Forman 78,272
Create "short sentences using the last word" (Aug '12) 8 min Yummy 8,097
WHAT???? A NEW word game? FOUR WORDS (Sep '08) 9 min beatlesinafog 41,247
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 11 min Jennifer Renee 9,853
Rest in Peace, Spock 11 min Independent1 324
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 19 min David Morrison 39,439
Name a smell you love to smell! (Jan '14) 42 min Mega Monster 846
6 letter word ...change one letter game (Oct '08) 2 hr say it aint so 27,592
More from around the web