Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.
Comments
102,321 - 102,340 of 114,560 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108002
Jan 16, 2014
 
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
See? you already lied,...evolution is a process by which DNA can develop! that is utter lying bullshite!, or you simply don't know any better.
You might want to let the New York times in on your discovery about DNA development, you are the only one who knows about it
Ergo if it is not read by a tiny faction of the internationally oriented Americans in New York it never existed.
Why?
Bohart never read it.
He never reads the NYT.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108003
Jan 16, 2014
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
Ergo if it is not read by a tiny faction of the internationally oriented Americans in New York it never existed.
Why?
Bohart never read it.
He never reads the NYT.
Wow! you really aren't to sharp are you? google sarcasm, whew!

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108004
Jan 16, 2014
 
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
You spend far,far more time attacking God than defending your own idiotic beliefs, I don't blame you though.
Lord!,....undirected natural forces make life all the time?
Please explain how undirected natural forces made the first life.
you can't, all you have is a belief that it happened.
All you ever do is say jew magic, jew magic, while you believe in puddle magic.
I believe that life and it's complexity and the universe is the result of a great intelligence that is obvious to anyone not embedded in total denial to it. Can't measure complexity! what a stupid evasion ,.I'll go slow for you what's more complex, a paper airplane , or the space shuttle?
"the harmony of natural law reveals an intelligence of such superiority , that compared with it , all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection"
Albert Einstein
In that case this elegance has an equal chance of being deemed god.

All the time life is made.

Laws are in action. But life in it's early state had different environments to cope with.

But there is no will or reason stating that.

It is chemistry and biochemistry (Lewis forces) and ultimately physics acting on random matter present from violent events in our past.

Find out where all the elements come from.

The idea is that we are old.

---
Can you recall the moment of your conception?

By your reasoning it is as if you are saying that evolution can only redeem itself when it can know that.

An intelligence ( with such modern notion as all-powerfull a.s.o.) could have decided to simply make some changes.

And make you aware of that.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108005
Jan 16, 2014
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Bohart would throw money at them too. Though in his case I don't feel quite as sympathetic.


Why don't you and these other ubber goobers try reading a book and educate yourselves about the universe by MIT professor Max Tegmark .....Mathematical Universe

He states that the universe isn't just described by math , but that it is math!

Math requires intelligence

or....just stick with the astronomical luck theory

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108006
Jan 17, 2014
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
In that case this elegance has an equal chance of being deemed god.
All the time life is made.
Laws are in action. But life in it's early state had different environments to cope with.
But there is no will or reason stating that.
It is chemistry and biochemistry (Lewis forces) and ultimately physics acting on random matter present from violent events in our past.
Find out where all the elements come from.
The idea is that we are old.
---
Can you recall the moment of your conception?
By your reasoning it is as if you are saying that evolution can only redeem itself when it can know that.
An intelligence ( with such modern notion as all-powerfull a.s.o.) could have decided to simply make some changes.
And make you aware of that.
Why do you people lie all the time about life?....all the time life is made! by already existing life! that's reproduction!

That life is mere chemistry was debunked decades ago, it's a 19th century idea blown apart by electron microscopes showing life wasn't simple globs waiting to be manufactured.

DNA is a complex code, there is no known natural mechanism that creates coded information, none!

It is impossible for Evolution to explain

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108007
Jan 17, 2014
 

Judged:

1

bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you people lie all the time about life?....all the time life is made! by already existing life! that's reproduction!
That life is mere chemistry was debunked decades ago, it's a 19th century idea blown apart by electron microscopes showing life wasn't simple globs waiting to be manufactured.
DNA is a complex code, there is no known natural mechanism that creates coded information, none!
It is impossible for Evolution to explain
Please provide a link to this debunk? I think I may find it interesting

The fact that godbot guesswork has been superseded by multiple (MULTIPLE) and independent lines of scientific discovery and DNA evidence really seems to upset you for some reason. That same DNA that you are quite happy to see as evidence in a court case and back it 100% you quite blatantly deny when it comes to having to defend your goddidit by magic belief.

Of course it is known how DNA is formed, Its just 4 common chemicals that are built from 5 basic elements These elements were available throughout the universe after the first proto stars exploded over 12 billion years ago. Jeez even a school kid knows this. As usual for a goddidit by magic fan, you are forgetting the one important principal - TIME

Nope it is impossible for you to understand, there is a very obvious difference

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108008
Jan 17, 2014
 

Judged:

1

bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow! you really aren't to sharp are you? google sarcasm, whew!
Oh my dearest godbot you would be surprised how sharp MAAT actually is. Just because you are not bright enough to comprehend is no ones fault but your own

Google reality
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108009
Jan 17, 2014
 

Judged:

1

bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
See? you already lied,...evolution is a process by which DNA can develop! that is utter lying bullshite!, or you simply don't know any better.
You might want to let the New York times in on your discovery about DNA development, you are the only one who knows about it
Leave the irony meters alone, Bo.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108010
Jan 17, 2014
 

Judged:

1

1

bohart wrote:
You spend far,far more time attacking God than defending your own idiotic beliefs, I don't blame you though.
How can I attack something which has not even been demonstrated to exist?

No Bo, what we attack are your uneducated assertions.
bohart wrote:
Lord!,....undirected natural forces make life all the time?
Yep. Do all plants require an intelligent planter?
bohart wrote:
Please explain how undirected natural forces made the first life.
Dunno yet.(shrug) Problem?
bohart wrote:
you can't, all you have is a belief that it happened.
Since life IS here then obviously life appeared somehow. Therefore no belief is required.
bohart wrote:
All you ever do is say jew magic, jew magic, while you believe in puddle magic.
Except there is nothing magic about chemistry. Unless you're claiming that all plants are magic.
bohart wrote:
I believe that life and it's complexity and the universe is the result of a great intelligence that is obvious to anyone not embedded in total denial to it.
Your beliefs are irrelevant.

However, I will point out that I have never denied the possibility of such a being. But there are three points you need to remember:

1 - If it exists, it's responsible for abiogenesis. Which is why it's rather stupid for you to argue against it, as you are simultaneously arguing against your claim.

2 - If it exists, it's responsible for evolution. Which is why it's rather stupid for you to argue against it, as you are simultaneously arguing against your claim.

3 - If it exists, it doesn't appear to have made itself amenable to the scientific method - it's not as if God pops its arm down now and then so we can do a blood test. Which is why it's rather stupid for you to claim it has anything at all to do with science. UNLESS you can demonstrate how it DOES pass the scientific method. So far no one on the planet has ever been able to do so in the entirety of human history.
bohart wrote:
Can't measure complexity! what a stupid evasion ,.I'll go slow for you what's more complex, a paper airplane , or the space shuttle?
I don't know, because I don't know what you're counting that gives one object a greater value than the other. I don't know how you're measuring complexity.

So go slow for me - obviously out of the space shuttle and the paper plane, one of them scores higher on your measuring scale. So how exactly is "complexity" being measured here? What precisely are you counting?
bohart wrote:
"the harmony of natural law reveals an intelligence of such superiority , that compared with it , all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection"
Albert Einstein
Misquoting an appeal to authority has no bearing on this discussion. Unless Einstein was able to demonstrate the existence of invisble Jew wizards that he didn't even believe in anyway. Remember, he was not an atheist, but he was not a theist either. Not that it matters which he was since his philosophical or theological opinions don't matter.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108011
Jan 17, 2014
 
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
You spend far,far more time attacking God than defending your own idiotic beliefs, I don't blame you though.
Lord!,....undirected natural forces make life all the time?
Please explain how undirected natural forces made the first life.
you can't, all you have is a belief that it happened.
All you ever do is say jew magic, jew magic, while you believe in puddle magic.
I believe that life and it's complexity and the universe is the result of a great intelligence that is obvious to anyone not embedded in total denial to it. Can't measure complexity! what a stupid evasion ,.I'll go slow for you what's more complex, a paper airplane , or the space shuttle?
"the harmony of natural law reveals an intelligence of such superiority , that compared with it , all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection"
Albert Einstein
He's not attacking God Bohart, he's attacking you, better yet your closed-mindedness on science. I've not read once where he directly opposed the existence of God - it's possible. improbable, but until someone can outright prove his existence, then only possible. I think most of the forum commenters opposing your stubbornness is aimed more at the Bible, and how benighted it is to claim it is the written rule based on facts, rather than a book of metaphors. But that's just my two cents. Take it at face value.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108012
Jan 17, 2014
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
How can I attack something which has not even been demonstrated to exist?
Oops, sorry Dude, you beat me to it.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108013
Jan 17, 2014
 
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you and these other ubber goobers try reading a book and educate yourselves about the universe by MIT professor Max Tegmark .....Mathematical Universe
He states that the universe isn't just described by math , but that it is math!
Math requires intelligence
or....just stick with the astronomical luck theory
Is that really his claim? That math requires intelligence THEREFORE Goddidit?

Or are you lying (again) and did you just tag that part on the end?

After all I'm sure you support transparency and wouldn't want to be perceived as a liar (again) would you?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108014
Jan 17, 2014
 

Judged:

2

1

bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you people lie all the time about life?....all the time life is made! by already existing life! that's reproduction!
Except that the Earth, and the universe, are finite. Therefore if we look at the evidence, life cannot go infinitely into the past. Ergo there must have been a point when life started. This has been observed in the geological record around 3.5 billion years ago.
bohart wrote:
That life is mere chemistry was debunked decades ago, it's a 19th century idea blown apart by electron microscopes showing life wasn't simple globs waiting to be manufactured.
Except you're wrong. Life IS pure chemistry through and through. However there is NOTHING in chemistry which claims things are just "simple blobs". In fact chemistry is EXTREMELY complicated. So for once in your life you can stop arguing against your straw-man. We don't support your straw-man so you will never have the satisfaction of debunking reailty itself whenever you knock that straw-man down.
bohart wrote:
DNA is a complex code, there is no known natural mechanism that creates coded information, none!
On the contrary, ONLY natural forces are observed to create DNA. The "code" you are describing (A,C,G,T) was invented by HUMANS. The code refers to CHEMICALS, called Adenine, Cytosine, Guanine and Thymine. And like all chemicals, certain ones react in certain ways. Just like hydrogen and oxygen create water. ACGT is no more a "code" than H2O is, but we know that natural chemical forces have no trouble making water.

So unless that is, you can describe the mechanisms your intelligent agent used and provide evidence of them.
bohart wrote:
It is impossible for Evolution to explain
Doesn't matter. The theory of evolution does not rely on abiogenesis. All the theory of evolution needs is for life to be here. Life IS here. Life evolves. Facts. In order to demonstrate otherwise you need to demonstrate that life is in fact NOT here.

Best of luck with that.
houh

Wilkes Barre, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108015
Jan 17, 2014
 
tffy
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108016
Jan 17, 2014
 
JM_Brazil wrote:
<quoted text>
Oops, sorry Dude, you beat me to it.
No worries, it's good to show that two people understand the arguments without prior communication being necessary.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108017
Jan 17, 2014
 
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you people lie all the time about life?....all the time life is made! by already existing life! that's reproduction!
That life is mere chemistry was debunked decades ago, it's a 19th century idea blown apart by electron microscopes showing life wasn't simple globs waiting to be manufactured.
DNA is a complex code, there is no known natural mechanism that creates coded information, none!
It is impossible for Evolution to explain
God reproduced

bio-chemistry and ultimately physics.

I suggest not hanging out in the 19 century.

Life is indeed not globs on the factory-floor

All life started simple. The build up took forever.

Really and here i puzzle on all those papers explaining the myriads of details!

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108018
Jan 17, 2014
 
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh my dearest godbot you would be surprised how sharp MAAT actually is. Just because you are not bright enough to comprehend is no ones fault but your own
Google reality
Hey dear1

Normally i never respond to Bo, but it has become very still in this part of topix.

Nice warm bath of flattery and praise, just what i needed.
i just sharpened my teeth on a new thesis on hybrid gods being all the vogue in the orient in the bronze age leading up to the iron-age.
To sign a contract between kings a Thousand semitic gods had to be brought forward.
That's a choice between famine and getting creative.

And i learned that crescent moon feasts actually had to do with the menses of bands of goddesses.

And many other things. As in people of the Levant executing burials with addition of graves for donkeys and servants!

The main question riding the thesis was not sufficiently answered. Some more sources should have been scrutinized.

But is was sufficiently clear that the isolated god or isolated religion never existed.
And everybody traveled like mad.
.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108019
Jan 17, 2014
 
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you people lie all the time about life?....all the time life is made! by already existing life! that's reproduction!
That life is mere chemistry was debunked decades ago, it's a 19th century idea blown apart by electron microscopes showing life wasn't simple globs waiting to be manufactured.
DNA is a complex code, there is no known natural mechanism that creates coded information, none!
It is impossible for Evolution to explain
isn't the periodic table a code? we were even able to predict some of the elements that should be there, and what their properties would be long before we were able to find those elements. that would seem like coded information.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108020
Jan 18, 2014
 
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Please provide a link to this debunk? I think I may find it interesting
The fact that godbot guesswork has been superseded by multiple (MULTIPLE) and independent lines of scientific discovery and DNA evidence really seems to upset you for some reason. That same DNA that you are quite happy to see as evidence in a court case and back it 100% you quite blatantly deny when it comes to having to defend your goddidit by magic belief.
Of course it is known how DNA is formed, Its just 4 common chemicals that are built from 5 basic elements These elements were available throughout the universe after the first proto stars exploded over 12 billion years ago. Jeez even a school kid knows this. As usual for a goddidit by magic fan, you are forgetting the one important principal - TIME
Nope it is impossible for you to understand, there is a very obvious difference
Please explain how DNA self assembled and where did that information come from

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#108021
Jan 18, 2014
 
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>Please explain how DNA self assembled and where did that information come from
Short answer: RNA.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••