Yes, note SETI relies on SIMPLE radio patterns rather than complex ones. This is because simple patterns are far more easier to recognise than complex ones, and therefore are far more likely to be used if someone wanted to make other civilizations in space recognise that they were here. There is a REASON why even the guys at SETI came out and said ID was crap.<quoted text>
Of all the idiots on here you are the King, the SETI program which searches the universe for some kind of a coherent signal, something as simple as a SOS, or morse code would be recognized as requiring intelligence to produce and taken as a given for proof of extraterrestrial intelligence. Yet when you blind religious goobers are faced with the enormous complexity of the DNA code ,which recently was discovered to have a second layer of information imbedded
You on the other hand claim "complexity" is evidence of intelligence but you have no idea on how to measure it in the first place. This kinda undercuts your claims big time.
Except that you're lying.you call that the product of chance!
So how many times do I have to explain to you that we have NEVER claimed it happened by "chance", and why? Too many to count. So why do you continue to lie about our claims?
An apple will always fall down. It will not fall up or sideways or diagonally "by chance" (unless other forces intervene), yet despite this gravity apparently works without any intelligent intervention being necessary.
Ergo it is NOT "chance".
And undirected natural forces make life all the time.no intelligence , mere undirected natural forces!
Look Bo, all you have to demonstrate your claims is tell us who or what your "intelligent designer" is, what it did, how it did it, where it did it, when it did it, and how this can be determined in an objective manner via the scientific method.You are like my grandfathers mule , equipped with blinders to avoid any and all distractions from your task. Protecting your world view
OH, so really all this is about God? Well no need to worry, since neither abiogenesis nor evolution, or indeed any other scientific concept claims that God definitely did not do it. Doesn't claim it did either, but doesn't say it didn't. Science is NOT atheism. So it's up to you if you prefer to place limits on an Almighty being capable of creating universes in its spare time.I have avoided quoted the bible here because it casts pearls before swine, but it does have a verse perfect for you and your deniers of intelligent reasoning
the fool has said there is no God
But at least now you can't claim that your objections have any relevance to science. As in reality all your beefs are is that you reject science cuz you think an invisible magic Jew didit. I can see now you will never be able to compete with anybody here scientifically as your only interest is apologetics. This is why you lose every argument you attempt as you NEVER bother to address the content of people's posts. You may as well just start threatening us with eternal damnation for merely disagreeing with your religious opinions, ya know, kinda like the Phelps family.(shrug)