I have had enough of your sick and demented evos fluffing on forum. You are the one quote mining to detract from the substance of the article. You lying piece of excrement.<quoted text>
The truth about ENCODE and FUNCTIONALITY
By one of the researchers...
"It was already known, for example, that vast portions of the genome are transcribed into RNA. A small amount of that RNA encodes protein, and some serves a regulatory role, but the rest of it is chock-full of seemingly nonsensical repeats, remnants of past viruses and other weird little bits that shouldn’t serve a purpose.
Read the whole article.Not that i expect this to arouse any dormant honesty you might have once had. Your repeated knuckle walking comments already confirm you as a deliberate liar who will claim anything to discredit the science you hate.
I can read as well as you can and the article states 80% functionality. A function is any function, be in regulatory or encoding.
You evos used to shove this rubbish about non functional junk down creos throats. Now you can suck eggs about it.
"The human genome encodes the blueprint of life, but the function of the vast majority of its nearly three billion bases is unknown. The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project has systematically mapped regions of transcription, transcription factor association, chromatin structure and histone modification. These data enabled us to assign biochemical functions for 80% of the genome, in particular outside of the well-studied protein-coding regions."
So you would care to take your foot out of your mouth and tell us what prediction TOE makes around non coding DNA? Ha ha! The answer is you lot thought TOE predicted left over useless junk, but now you are back tracking into buffoonery. Can TOE make a predition or not??????
2. The genome will be found to be fully functional. A creator has no need to put junk in the genome as evos predicted. So far we are up to a definite 80% and well credentialled researchers eg Gingeras from ENCODE, fully expect that to rise to 100%.
Here is what the researcher said...
And what’s in the remaining 20 percent? Possibly not junk either, according to Ewan Birney, the project’s Lead Analysis Coordinator and self-described “cat-herder-in-chief”. He explains that ENCODE only (!) looked at 147 types of cells, and the human body has a few thousand. A given part of the genome might control a gene in one cell type, but not others. If every cell is included, functions may emerge for the phantom proportion.“It’s likely that 80 percent will go to 100 percent,” says Birney.“We don’t really have any large chunks of redundant DNA. This metaphor of junk isn’t that useful.”
Just keep sucking eggs Chimney, and holding onto your faith, because all your struggling, accusations and tantrums are not going to change anything just because you know how to lie.