DER indeed Maz. That is a mistatement of evolution.<quoted text>
Yep, that sure made a mess of the evo claim that species go extinct to give way to the newest and fitter model, didn't it????. DER!
And you keep forgetting that a new niche was opening up in both the whale evolution and in the case of Tiktaalik. When a new niche opens new life evolves to fill it. There is no reason at all for the predecessors to die out.
Can you understand that simple fact or do we have to go over it again.
Here, an explanation just for you. If Australians are descended from British people why are there still British people?
Ha! Take that evolutionists.
Sure they do. Epistasis is only part of the speed limit. It is not part of an over all limit.<quoted text>
Your best researchers do not know how evolution works eg negative epistasis. The how, when, where and why of evolution is still up for grabs. You hypocrite, that demands a higher level of substantiation from a creationist than you lot have ever been able to present for yourselves.
Here is a question, see if you can answer it honestly. Did any of those researchers, who accept the theory of evolution, seem concerned at all about the "problem of epistasis"? You know that they weren't. It is not an issue.
No, you found one article that said that. You could not even find the article that the Nat. Geo article was supposedly based upon. All the articles that I can find about it say from 40 to 35 million years ago.Listen up! Evos have basilosaurus dated to 49mya. You have indohyus that resembles a modern mouse deer/chevrotain and ambulocetus natans that resembles a sea lion or seal and basilosaurus that predates its ancestors, and biology books that are presenting the ancetors of the direct line as their glossy misrepresentation of lineage. That is not evidence for anything other than an over active imagination based on the prevailing bias.
Since you could not substantiate your date you lost.
No, that is not evidence of no intermediates. What a complete effing moron you are.Listen up tail chaser! I have evidence of tetrapods being dated by your own idiots to 395mya. That is direct evidence of land animals being here with NO intermediates between land and sea and suddenly appearing in the fossil record. Hello!
Suck it up Suuby, because all your blustering, opinions and trying to bring evidence for creation into an evolutionary paradigm is fruitless.
One more time, species overlap all of the time. And you did not even find fossils of a species, once again you found possible, and I am going to emphasize, possible footprints of a land based species. You cannot claim anything without a body.