Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#106087 Nov 16, 2013
This is the dumbest thing you have written so far. How about a link to an experiment showing how god walked with man? A scientific model of these spirit forms perhaps? Still bearing false witness I see. What does your imaginary friend say about that?
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually oh bible expert, scientists are always waffling on about the possibility of alien life and here we are trying to give them evidence of it but they are too stupid to realize it.
God walked with man as did other spirits that could transpose into other forms, in this case a snake. The physics behind it is supported by the fact that energy/light, which spirit forms are as is God, are able to form matter.
Now after you pick your dummy up off the floor maybe you evotards can actually present some postive research, you know SCIENCE, that supports an organisms ability to adapt without limit, instead of demonstrating yourselves to be evotards heading for the hills.
The data supports a creationist paradigm in that adaptation is limited and organisms will never adapt out of their familial group.
Until then you can keep fluffing in the wind and begging your philosophical hubris.
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#106088 Nov 16, 2013
Which one of those things proves that snakes can talk?
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
How about I hit you in the head with modern bird footprints dated to 212mya and more than halfway back to the Devonian, being created after sea life.
How about I demonstrate evo scientists with some 'poofing' ability themselves?
These scientists have invented out of thin air, theropods with a reversed hallux instead of admitting they have no clue what they are talking about.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v417/n68...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2466-an...
How about a variety of tetrapods that suddenly appear on the heel of the Devonian, 395mya, throwing Tiktaalic out to that great garbage bin of evolutionary delusions past and falsified?
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100106/full/n...
I reckon it will be me hitting you over the head with your stupid fossils.

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#106089 Nov 16, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
Like this -
"I am absolutely delighted to report that our usually recalcitrant fossil record has come through in exemplary fashion. During the past fifteen years, new discoveries in Africa and Pakistan have added greatly to our paleontological knowledge of the earliest history of whales".
(Natural History 5/94) Steven J. Gould
But just five years later, Scientific American (January 1999) reported the discovery of fossilized ankle bones that has “left [whale] researchers even more puzzled than before.” The author of this article states that these bones (found in Pakistan!)“leave researchers wondering where whales came from.” Sorry Steven.
So what happened to all the transitional forms SZ?, none around now,(a broken record for your side), but why? They are found as drawings in evo textbooks to comfort Darwinist's. Your transnationals (all now extinct, we think) have fwd nostrils, none moving to the top.(Mosasaur, Pleiosaur), Whales are independent as skull top breathers.
What is it that puzzles the researchers. You don't specify what that is that supports your position other than out of context quotes. Oh, that is it. Quote mining supports your position. Right. I forgot.

Now are you trying to argue that whales evolved from mosasours and pleiosaurs? The scientists that study whale evolution aren't saying that. You are all over the place SBT.

Your arguments need more cowbell too.

Level 1

Since: Jul 12

Australia

#106090 Nov 16, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Evolution doesn't run on a set time and I don't know any reason that whales couldn't evolve in 4 million years. If you can show it can't occur over that duration, you haven't provided the evidence here.
As to your 2nd point the differences in age of the fossils in discussion do not break any connections between the two. You have not provided data to make the conclusions that you do. Think of a tree branch. Indohyus is on one branch more basal to the common ancestor between whales and hippos. Just because it is in effect ancestoral to whales does not mean it had to disappear as soon as whales made their appearance. Only a fool that does not understand science and scientific evidence would dance a jig thinking that it does.
You arguments need more cowbell. Really work the cowbell dear.
There also 'isn't any reason' why God couldn't poof life into existence. However, you evos have been waffling on adnauseum for decades that such an argument has no merit.

Indeed if you clowns want to mention whales as some glory sack of evidence then be prepared to have to speak to the ugly truth without having to defer to the bluster of 'there isn't any reason', as your big hero defence.

Your empirical evidence was yet again WRONG. If it was us creos coming up with such a flop, we would never hear the end of it.

I was asked to demonstrate what was wrong with one of your 'best' documented examples of evolution and I have. The fact that you evos don't like that I can and have done so, does not change the fact that I can nor than whale evolution is a great example of the misrepresentation sold to the public.

Level 1

Since: Jul 12

Australia

#106091 Nov 16, 2013
davy wrote:
Which one of those things proves that snakes can talk?
<quoted text>
The alien one that lives in another big bang dimension and scoots around on dark matter all day, so you can't see or find him.

Level 1

Since: Jul 12

Australia

#106092 Nov 16, 2013
davy wrote:
This is the dumbest thing you have written so far. How about a link to an experiment showing how god walked with man? A scientific model of these spirit forms perhaps? Still bearing false witness I see. What does your imaginary friend say about that?
<quoted text>
Do you mean something like well credentialled researchers operating from the basis of the Copernican philosophy as their overiding principle based on science? LOL! ROLF!

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#106093 Nov 16, 2013
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
There also 'isn't any reason' why God couldn't poof life into existence. However, you evos have been waffling on adnauseum for decades that such an argument has no merit.
Of course it has no merit. It is a mental dead end. What you are arguing for is last Tuesdayism, it is a nontestable, unfalsifiable idea of zero merit. It stops people from looking for an answer. It is the idiots way out.
Indeed if you clowns want to mention whales as some glory sack of evidence then be prepared to have to speak to the ugly truth without having to defer to the bluster of 'there isn't any reason', as your big hero defence.
Your empirical evidence was yet again WRONG. If it was us creos coming up with such a flop, we would never hear the end of it.
I was asked to demonstrate what was wrong with one of your 'best' documented examples of evolution and I have. The fact that you evos don't like that I can and have done so, does not change the fact that I can nor than whale evolution is a great example of the misrepresentation sold to the public.
How was our evidence wrong moron? You have not come close to showing that. You had one questionable article whose date could not be verified elsewhere. And even if it was true the overlap of creatures does not upset the theory of evolution in any way.

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#106094 Nov 16, 2013
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
There also 'isn't any reason' why God couldn't poof life into existence. However, you evos have been waffling on adnauseum for decades that such an argument has no merit.
Indeed if you clowns want to mention whales as some glory sack of evidence then be prepared to have to speak to the ugly truth without having to defer to the bluster of 'there isn't any reason', as your big hero defence.
Your empirical evidence was yet again WRONG. If it was us creos coming up with such a flop, we would never hear the end of it.
I was asked to demonstrate what was wrong with one of your 'best' documented examples of evolution and I have. The fact that you evos don't like that I can and have done so, does not change the fact that I can nor than whale evolution is a great example of the misrepresentation sold to the public.
There isn't any reason that God couldn't have "poofed" everything into existence. However, there is no evidence that such happened and all the evidence indicates that life evolved on this planet including whales. You may like our answers, but that isn't my problem. Come up with better questions.

What creationists come up with is flop. Apparently you missed that.

You haven't refuted anything that I am aware of. Your arm waving about whales is reasonably explained by the theory of evolution through the available evidence as I explained.

More cowbell old girl, more cowbell. Really work the space. You are twerking for Jesus after all.
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#106095 Nov 16, 2013
Severely religitarded.
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you mean something like well credentialled researchers operating from the basis of the Copernican philosophy as their overiding principle based on science? LOL! ROLF!

Level 1

Since: Jul 12

Australia

#106096 Nov 16, 2013
Listen Subby and Dan if you think your hubris has any substance the both of you are bigger idiots than I thought.

You would have to be one of the most laziest evos ever.

You fluff and dance around giving challenges and then think your hubris has some sort of merit. I am not fooled by your ability to spam.

If the change of the 4 million years initially speculated down to 4my does not constitute having been wrong intially, to you idiots, then all I can say is no wonder you have all been sucked in. LOL!

Level 1

Since: Jul 12

Australia

#106097 Nov 16, 2013
Repost

Listen Subby and Dan if you think your hubris has any substance the both of you are bigger idiots than I thought.

You would have to be one of the most laziest evos ever.

You fluff and dance around giving challenges and then think your hubris has some sort of merit. I am not fooled by your ability to spam.

If the change of the 15 million years initially speculated down to 4my does not constitute having been wrong intially, to you idiots, then all I can say is no wonder you have all been sucked in. LOL!

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#106098 Nov 16, 2013
MazHere wrote:
Listen Subby and Dan if you think your hubris has any substance the both of you are bigger idiots than I thought.
You would have to be one of the most laziest evos ever.
You fluff and dance around giving challenges and then think your hubris has some sort of merit. I am not fooled by your ability to spam.
If the change of the 4 million years initially speculated down to 4my does not constitute having been wrong intially, to you idiots, then all I can say is no wonder you have all been sucked in. LOL!
Hubris!? What a a joke. And this coming from an idiot who thinks she understand the articles that she links.

How are we lazy? You give us idiotically easy challenges and then we meet them. Now if we could not debunk your idiocy you might have a point. Seriously I wish you would bring a challenging problem for us. But all you have is simple minded twaddle.

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#106099 Nov 16, 2013
MazHere wrote:
Listen Subby and Dan if you think your hubris has any substance the both of you are bigger idiots than I thought.
You would have to be one of the most laziest evos ever.
You fluff and dance around giving challenges and then think your hubris has some sort of merit. I am not fooled by your ability to spam.
If the change of the 4 million years initially speculated down to 4my does not constitute having been wrong intially, to you idiots, then all I can say is no wonder you have all been sucked in. LOL!
Nothing of substance in this rant that refutes evolution.

Next.

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#106100 Nov 16, 2013
MazHere wrote:
Repost
Listen Subby and Dan if you think your hubris has any substance the both of you are bigger idiots than I thought.
You would have to be one of the most laziest evos ever.
You fluff and dance around giving challenges and then think your hubris has some sort of merit. I am not fooled by your ability to spam.
If the change of the 15 million years initially speculated down to 4my does not constitute having been wrong intially, to you idiots, then all I can say is no wonder you have all been sucked in. LOL!
Again, nothing of substance to refute evolution here.

So there is a difference in the timing based on new fossil findings. You interpret that to mean the whole body of science is tumbling down. Do you stop your car and go back every time you hit a bump because you think you killed someone? That is your logic, not mine.

You spend a lot of time rambling on about something that doesn't mean what you say it means. Then you get all pissy and insulting when you are told that it is wrong and why.

You're still mad because we dropped that house on your sister aren't you.

Level 1

Since: Jul 12

Australia

#106101 Nov 16, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Hubris!? What a a joke. And this coming from an idiot who thinks she understand the articles that she links.
How are we lazy? You give us idiotically easy challenges and then we meet them. Now if we could not debunk your idiocy you might have a point. Seriously I wish you would bring a challenging problem for us. But all you have is simple minded twaddle.
What a pair of confused dorks you and Dan are. I undestand the research perfectly well. You are so stupid you reckon ridiculing me without one word to demonstrate exacatly what I have misrepresented makes you a hero. Instead it demonstrates you are an incompetent dungspinner full of yourself.

This is about you idiots demonstrating the data aligns with TOE better than a creationists paradigm

Let's recap how you lot have done so far.

I have posted empirical data that attests to genomic mechanisms that reduce or limit an organisms ability to adapt and you mainitain this is excellent evidence for evolution rather than creation.

You challenged me to cite 'wrongs' with whale fossil evidence. I presented Basilosaurus that is older than Indohyus, and has reduced the evolution of land animal to fully aquatic in 4 million years, and you manintain this is great evidence for evolution and rsearchers never got anything wrong.

You challenged me to define human beings, which I did. Then I asked you to define human beings and you ignored me and headed for the hills.

In between we've have goons like Dan and Aura with her icecream..and now you have the hide to call me an idiot, you retarded boofhead.

DER to you!

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#106102 Nov 16, 2013
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
What a pair of confused dorks you and Dan are. I undestand the research perfectly well. You are so stupid you reckon ridiculing me without one word to demonstrate exacatly what I have misrepresented makes you a hero. Instead it demonstrates you are an incompetent dungspinner full of yourself.
This is about you idiots demonstrating the data aligns with TOE better than a creationists paradigm
Let's recap how you lot have done so far.
I have posted empirical data that attests to genomic mechanisms that reduce or limit an organisms ability to adapt and you mainitain this is excellent evidence for evolution rather than creation.
You challenged me to cite 'wrongs' with whale fossil evidence. I presented Basilosaurus that is older than Indohyus, and has reduced the evolution of land animal to fully aquatic in 4 million years, and you manintain this is great evidence for evolution and rsearchers never got anything wrong.
You challenged me to define human beings, which I did. Then I asked you to define human beings and you ignored me and headed for the hills.
In between we've have goons like Dan and Aura with her icecream..and now you have the hide to call me an idiot, you retarded boofhead.
DER to you!
Oh Maz. You do still care. I was afraid we had lost that spark between us.

So you cited a new piece of information that in no way refutes the evolution of whales. Well done. You could have just said that, but I know how you like to fill page after page of ad hom attacks and pointless quibbles. You know how that sparks me and makes me want to go down under, you naughty thing.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#106103 Nov 16, 2013
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
What a pair of confused dorks you and Dan are. I undestand the research perfectly well. You are so stupid you reckon ridiculing me without one word to demonstrate exacatly what I have misrepresented makes you a hero. Instead it demonstrates you are an incompetent dungspinner full of yourself.
Give us something worth debunking. Right now your inflated blue waffle must be making you delusional. You have given nothing of significance yet. Post something that is a bit meaty and we will get more serious.
This is about you idiots demonstrating the data aligns with TOE better than a creationists paradigm
You haven't yet to post any. All you have demonstrated is that you are an idiot.
Let's recap how you lot have done so far.
I have posted empirical data that attests to genomic mechanisms that reduce or limit an organisms ability to adapt and you mainitain this is excellent evidence for evolution rather than creation.
No, you haven't. And that's the problem. All you have posted is are articles about how evolution occurs and that you did not understand.
You challenged me to cite 'wrongs' with whale fossil evidence. I presented Basilosaurus that is older than Indohyus, and has reduced the evolution of land animal to fully aquatic in 4 million years, and you manintain this is great evidence for evolution and rsearchers never got anything wrong.
How quickly you forgot. That is exactly what you did not do. You do know that Nat. Geo. does make the occasional boner when it comes to scientific articles. You could not find any other evidence that agreed with that date. That would be a failure on you part.
You challenged me to define human beings, which I did. Then I asked you to define human beings and you ignored me and headed for the hills.
I must have missed that one. We were probably laughing to hard at the rest of the idiocy that you posted. You probably screwed that one up two. I have told you that since you lie and try to do a version of the Gish Gallop that you are allowed only one topic per post. Did you make a mistake and double up?
In between we've have goons like Dan and Aura with her icecream..and now you have the hide to call me an idiot, you retarded boofhead.
DER to you!
I was extremely nice to you when we tried to respond to your idiocy. Dan and Aura have been rather kind too, all things considered.

So do you have anything at all, or are you still just an idiot?

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#106104 Nov 16, 2013
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
What a pair of confused dorks you and Dan are. I undestand the research perfectly well. You are so stupid you reckon ridiculing me without one word to demonstrate exacatly what I have misrepresented makes you a hero. Instead it demonstrates you are an incompetent dungspinner full of yourself.
This is about you idiots demonstrating the data aligns with TOE better than a creationists paradigm
Let's recap how you lot have done so far.
I have posted empirical data that attests to genomic mechanisms that reduce or limit an organisms ability to adapt and you mainitain this is excellent evidence for evolution rather than creation.
You challenged me to cite 'wrongs' with whale fossil evidence. I presented Basilosaurus that is older than Indohyus, and has reduced the evolution of land animal to fully aquatic in 4 million years, and you manintain this is great evidence for evolution and rsearchers never got anything wrong.
You challenged me to define human beings, which I did. Then I asked you to define human beings and you ignored me and headed for the hills.
In between we've have goons like Dan and Aura with her icecream..and now you have the hide to call me an idiot, you retarded boofhead.
DER to you!
But you're the cutest little self licking ice cream cone head this side of the pecos ?
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#106105 Nov 16, 2013
you have failed to cite falsifiable scientific research that supports the idea of a talking snake. You are a liar and a charlatan telling lies for Jesus.
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
What a pair of confused dorks you and Dan are. I undestand the research perfectly well. You are so stupid you reckon ridiculing me without one word to demonstrate exacatly what I have misrepresented makes you a hero. Instead it demonstrates you are an incompetent dungspinner full of yourself.
This is about you idiots demonstrating the data aligns with TOE better than a creationists paradigm
Let's recap how you lot have done so far.
I have posted empirical data that attests to genomic mechanisms that reduce or limit an organisms ability to adapt and you mainitain this is excellent evidence for evolution rather than creation.
You challenged me to cite 'wrongs' with whale fossil evidence. I presented Basilosaurus that is older than Indohyus, and has reduced the evolution of land animal to fully aquatic in 4 million years, and you manintain this is great evidence for evolution and rsearchers never got anything wrong.
You challenged me to define human beings, which I did. Then I asked you to define human beings and you ignored me and headed for the hills.
In between we've have goons like Dan and Aura with her icecream..and now you have the hide to call me an idiot, you retarded boofhead.
DER to you!
davy

Albuquerque, NM

#106106 Nov 16, 2013
Still waiting for empirical data that supports a talking snake. Religion kills brains dead.
MazHere wrote:
<quoted text>
What a pair of confused dorks you and Dan are. I undestand the research perfectly well. You are so stupid you reckon ridiculing me without one word to demonstrate exacatly what I have misrepresented makes you a hero. Instead it demonstrates you are an incompetent dungspinner full of yourself.
This is about you idiots demonstrating the data aligns with TOE better than a creationists paradigm
Let's recap how you lot have done so far.
I have posted empirical data that attests to genomic mechanisms that reduce or limit an organisms ability to adapt and you mainitain this is excellent evidence for evolution rather than creation.
You challenged me to cite 'wrongs' with whale fossil evidence. I presented Basilosaurus that is older than Indohyus, and has reduced the evolution of land animal to fully aquatic in 4 million years, and you manintain this is great evidence for evolution and rsearchers never got anything wrong.
You challenged me to define human beings, which I did. Then I asked you to define human beings and you ignored me and headed for the hills.
In between we've have goons like Dan and Aura with her icecream..and now you have the hide to call me an idiot, you retarded boofhead.
DER to you!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
20,000th Post Wins - 2d Edition (Jan '13) 3 min Truths 1,284
95 Viewers Right Now 5 min Hoosier Hillbilly 1
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 5 min Kathlene 21,359
Create "short sentences using the last word" (Aug '12) 6 min Truths 7,135
Make A Sentance out of a 5 letter word. (Nov '09) 7 min Hoosier Hillbilly 29,545
Do you have a Topix crush? (Jun '11) 8 min Denny CranesPlace 6,372
Who do you trust on offbeat ? (Sep '12) 9 min Kathlene 215
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr Mister_ E 147,643
I Like..... (Mar '14) 6 hr SLY WEST 376
Woman Held in Jail for Weeks Over SpaghettiOs 9 hr NOM s Waffle House 9

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE