You have that back-asswards as usual. No empirical records indicate a limit to evolution beyond those limits from such laws as the square/cubed laws etc.. Why would people look for a limit to what is observed?<quoted text>
No empirical evidence demonstrates an organisms ability to adapt without limits and you have a world of breeders and climate change to give you idiots first hand observational data.
As for nested hierarchies, how the heck do you root anything in tetrapod when you have only just dicovered tetrapods were here 400mya prior to any of your stupid transitionals used to root with. What you have is algorithmic magic, not science.
And you do not need every single fossil to see where a nested hierarchy goes. We also have DNA evidence from various species that follows the same nested hierarchies. They can help fill in each others gaps.
I am glad to be of service Maz. Try not to flap so much.