You still got it wrong. No mistaking that.<quoted text>
Ain't evo science great! The same fossil line up proves human knuckle walking ancestry and ancestry to a non knuckle walker. YIKES!!!! Great scientific credibility...LOL!
No wonder this has happened.....
As noted before, it is downright hysterical that you would use a peer-reviewed paper to show that peer-reviewed papers are mostly wrong."Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research."
Has it ever crossed your tiny, little mind that this paper is likely wrong as well?
No. I didn't think so.