Ahhh, the next chapter in your entirely predictable Creatard Playbook.<quoted text>
You haven't pointed out anything at all. What you have offered is your opinion.
Here is my opinion about TOE.
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
"Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research."
Indeed a documented Genesis account at least gives creos a scenario to support falsify and make predictions from. TOE is a theory in evolution itself and has no preditive ability and is based on flawed and biased research, and still upposts a creationists paradigm better than TOE. eg human knuckle walking ancestry falsified on the back of one single fossil, the deteriorating genome, punctuated equilibrium, the death of single celled LUCA.
Having charged in and made a bunch of silly, specific claims that all foundered or were irrelevant, you move onto the tactic of trying to discredit the methods of science more generally.
So HOW is the falsehood of a particular research claim verified MAZ? Considered that?
Nope. You are just piling more silly on, as usual.