Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 223290 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#104774 Nov 5, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
He says it all the time.
Then why didn't you quote him saying that?

He said "your god" there, he did not say "god". Do you understand the difference?

Probably not. You have a mental block of some sort.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#104775 Nov 5, 2013
Please note, in my prior post I should have written that woodtick implied "your god" not god in general.

He has claimed that certain gods have been shown not to exist.

Christians make the mistake of assuming that their god is the only possible god. An arrogance that comes from assuming that they are correct.

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104776 Nov 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>what is it you think this quote from the post i responded to means, fool?
"Scientists have every possible environment able to be reproduced in the lab. They can muck around with genes. Yet, after all this time and funding the fact is they have NOT made a living life form."
Science is what says that they can recreate early earth conditions in their lab. Have you forgot that. Example Miller–Urey experiment to name just one. So MazHere was just saying what science implies and says.

“Merry Christmas”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Happy New Year

#104777 Nov 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>give me some string and a stick and i can make him dance a jig....
I believe you. Don't forget to walk him and make sure he gets plenty of water and food. I am not sure what to feed him, but I see on here he eats a lot of shit. He seems to like it.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#104778 Nov 5, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me walk you through it.
<quoted text>
Your reply was;
<quoted text>
Not once is their comment did they insinuate that. So you just made up BS as usual.
You seem to have missed the sarcasm.

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104779 Nov 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why didn't you quote him saying that?
He said "your god" there, he did not say "god". Do you understand the difference?
Probably not. You have a mental block of some sort.
The only God we speak of is "God the creator" He is the only God I believe in. So to me he is saying God is proven false.

You understand the difference there? We don't talk about Zues or Poseidon or etc etc do we?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#104780 Nov 5, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Science is what says that they can recreate early earth conditions in their lab. Have you forgot that. Example Miller–Urey experiment to name just one. So MazHere was just saying what science implies and says.
Early Earth conditions can be recreated in the laboratory. The processes needed can be reproduced, but speeding up the time factor needed is very difficult. So unless you can name an experiment that has run for millions of years people cannot claim that science has failed. They may not have succeeded yet, but that in now means that they have failed.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#104781 Nov 5, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
The only God we speak of is "God the creator" He is the only God I believe in. So to me he is saying God is proven false.
You understand the difference there? We don't talk about Zues or Poseidon or etc etc do we?
Yes, your personal prejudiced assumes your "God" is the only possibility. You are misunderstanding what he has claimed.

The reason we don't speak about other gods is that no one believes in them. Why didn't you mention Allah or the various Hindu gods, hmm, I wonder why?

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104782 Nov 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no, you misunderstand what i say all the time.
you clearly are not very intelligent...
Where is your evidence that proves God of the bible false?

Funny you always claim that but never back it up.

Now the bible was written by man, so it is not perfect and has mistakes just like anything else man has done. And in your own words you say the bible can't be used as evidence. So how can you use it for evidence against God?

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104783 Nov 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Early Earth conditions can be recreated in the laboratory. The processes needed can be reproduced, but speeding up the time factor needed is very difficult. So unless you can name an experiment that has run for millions of years people cannot claim that science has failed. They may not have succeeded yet, but that in now means that they have failed.
On that same note unless you can show that every potential pathway for God to exist has been explored then you cannot say God is impossible, proven false or can’t exist.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#104784 Nov 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
A word of warning, replaytime thinks of his god as "living" and therefore if that god used some sort of magic to start life that does not qualify as abiogenesis. Yet by the definition of abiogenesis most would say that it does.
The "living god" thing was the favorite game of Marksman11.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#104785 Nov 5, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is your evidence that proves God of the bible false?
Funny you always claim that but never back it up.
Now the bible was written by man, so it is not perfect and has mistakes just like anything else man has done. And in your own words you say the bible can't be used as evidence. So how can you use it for evidence against God?
Where else do you get any information about THAT god except from the bible?

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104786 Nov 5, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to have missed the sarcasm.
Sarcasm is one thing but he wasn't being sarcastic. Read his last few posts. They show that.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#104787 Nov 5, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
The only God we speak of is "God the creator" He is the only God I believe in. So to me he is saying God is proven false.
You understand the difference there? We don't talk about Zues or Poseidon or etc etc do we?
yeah, ummmm...we've been around this one already...

where do you get your concept of this god you believe in except from that bible? or did you create this god yourself, which brings us back to a man-made god again...

you already lost this debate, why are you trying it again?

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104788 Nov 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, your personal prejudiced assumes your "God" is the only possibility. You are misunderstanding what he has claimed.
The reason we don't speak about other gods is that no one believes in them. Why didn't you mention Allah or the various Hindu gods, hmm, I wonder why?
God is God whether another culture calls him Allah or what ever.

Allah(the Arabic word for God) means God the creator and sustainer of the universe.

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104789 Nov 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Where else do you get any information about THAT god except from the bible?
So like I said. A book you say can't be used for evidence is what you are using for evidence. That is logical as can be huh. lol

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#104790 Nov 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
A word of warning, replaytime thinks of his god as "living" and therefore if that god used some sort of magic to start life that does not qualify as abiogenesis. Yet by the definition of abiogenesis most would say that it does.
What would you say is the definition of abiogenesis?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#104791 Nov 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, your personal prejudiced assumes your "God" is the only possibility. You are misunderstanding what he has claimed.
The reason we don't speak about other gods is that no one believes in them. Why didn't you mention Allah or the various Hindu gods, hmm, I wonder why?
allah is the same god, different sect of the abrahamic cult, but still the god of abraham...

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#104792 Nov 5, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
On that same note unless you can show that every potential pathway for God to exist has been explored then you cannot say God is impossible, proven false or can’t exist.
And I never have.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#104793 Nov 5, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
So like I said. A book you say can't be used for evidence is what you are using for evidence. That is logical as can be huh. lol
when did i say it cannot be used as evidence? it is the book that creates this god, it is the book that proves this god to be false.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Make America # 1 4 min Hoosier Hillbilly 4
The W A L L 6 min Hoosier Hillbilly 4
Denny Crain's Place (May '10) 9 min Laura Befffy 34,858
Would you vote for Oprah to be the next president? 24 min Barefoot And Preg... 32
3rd To The Last Post Wins! (Aug '10) 34 min Emerald 4,273
A-Z of "ANY WORD" that comes to mind! (Sep '12) 42 min Emerald 1,228
What Turns You Off? (Jan '17) 49 min liam cul8r 1,214
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 3 hr Sublime1 227,182
Poll What are you thinking right now? (May '08) 4 hr Biff 6,955
More from around the web