He seems to be as bad as Urb, everything means what they want it to.<quoted text>
You misread what he wrote. He did not say that it is impossible to measure the difference between species.
Creatards seem to be experts a misreading articles.
The point that researcher was making is that there is more than one way to measure differences. Still the validity of the 98% similarity between the species still stands.
When you find a source that actually says what you claim it does then I might need references to debunk you. When you misread your own references there is no need for me to supply any to debunk yours. That has already been done.
Here is a clue for creatards, if you think an article by a biologist opposes evolution you better check the article again. Odds are over 99% that you are wrong.
But chapter 5 explains it pretty well how we know we are directly related to chimps,,,huh?