not a refutation of abiogenesis?<quoted text>
I have. The evidence has been there for 3.5 billion years. Before then there was no life. Ergo abiogenesis. Pointing out that scientists haven't figured out the riddle of abiogenesis yet is NOT a refutation of abiogenesis. Far from it in fact.
When you want to start being honest do let us know.
It has never been observed , it has failed in every testable experiment, and it certainly hasn't been repeated.
It therefore fails the scientific method in every way.
But you keep going Sisyphus, keep rolling the rock.