Evidence that it can be far simpler which supports a incremental development:<quoted text>
So from a picture you assume that all prokaryotes have one and that the earliest ones did? Even though biologists painstakingly point out that the flagellum has to be the result of multiple evolutionary steps over millions of years? Even though any biology book dealing with bacteria will doubtlessly show many pitures of bacteria with and without flagella?
I am sorry but the only words I can use to describe your claim is its bloody stupid. Very, very stupid. One of the dumbest creationist attempts at distorting what biologists claim yet, and these liars have tried just about everything.
If a representative picture of a mammal had a tail would that mean biologists assume all mammals have tails?
PS Denton is an evolutionist. Cheers.