Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 219629 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#102725 Oct 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>regardless of how you want to classify it, you cannot get high from licking it.
real men can admit when they are wrong...what happened to you?
I was addressing the poison part of the post. I don't know if they can get someone high or not, I did leave that out. But I do know it is the Bufo alvarius that can.

“Good day to you!”

Level 2

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#102726 Oct 22, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Yes the seabeds were pushed up, but until several years ago none of the primordial supercontinent had been found and was thought to have been recycled long ago. It was found, and it out dates the sea , this means the crust was pushing up out of the molten lava before the ocean was there.
So when the ocean formed and other parts of Vaalbara were pushing up the Earth was forming dynamically and rising and falling land masses suggest there may never been a time when all the surface was covered by water at the same time.
The evidence is suggesting the old views were incorrect , as a 4.2 billion year old continent is older than a 3.8 billion year old ocean.
http://www3.uni-bonn.de/Press-releases/a-new-...
It's a theory. Like the older theory.
"A new theory on the formation of the oldest continents"
From your link..."The oceanic crust could (COULD) have simply 'oozed' continents at the same time that other geological processes were occurring, like volcanism, orogeny, and the influx of water."
By the way, it is quite evident that the mantle and crust of the earth in it's infancy were older than the first sea and or ocean floors since gasses making clouds that produced rain fall came afterwards. Just saying.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#102727 Oct 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>regardless of how you want to classify it, you cannot get high from licking it.
real men can admit when they are wrong...what happened to you?
If by "you classify it" you mean me, it is not how "I" classify it. It is how science classifies it.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102728 Oct 22, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I was addressing the poison part of the post. I don't know if they can get someone high or not, I did leave that out. But I do know it is the Bufo alvarius that can.
googling toads in your spare time?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102729 Oct 22, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Tick can you put the verse that says that. Why you are at it put up the verse that says there were plants before the sun.
read your cult book, it will do you good to realize what a foolish cult you take your ideas from...

“ad victoriam”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#102730 Oct 22, 2013
MAAT wrote:
KONG brough that info.:
The scientifically illiterate will attempt to seize upon this to denegrate science and specifically, evolution. In contrast, the rest of us will understand it is not only exceedingly HONEST of science, but it to suggest that the branching of the Neanderthal and modern human (Cro Magnon?) being pushed back further -- if you accept the findings below -- is INCREASING our knowledge of early man.
http://phys.org/news/2013-10-hominin-ancestor ...
No known hominin is ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans, research says
October 21st, 2013 in Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils
Study: No known hominin is ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans.
The search for a common ancestor linking modern humans with the Neanderthals who lived in Europe thousands of years ago has been a compelling subject for research. But a new study suggests the quest isn't nearly complete.
The researchers, using quantitative methods focused on the shape of dental fossils, find that none of the usual suspects fits the expected profile of an ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans. They also present evidence that the lines that led to Neanderthals and modern humans diverged nearly 1 million years ago, much earlier than studies based on molecular evidence have suggested.
The study, which will be published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, was carried out by an international team of scholars from The George Washington University, Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research in Austria, Indiana University and Atapuerca Research Team in Spain.
"Our results call attention to the strong discrepancies between molecular and paleontological estimates of the divergence time between Neanderthals and modern humans," said Aida Gómez-Robles, lead author of the paper and a postdoctoral scientist at the Center for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology of The George Washington University. "These discrepancies cannot be simply ignored, but they have to be somehow reconciled."
P. David Polly, professor in the Department of Geological Sciences in the IU Bloomington College of Arts and Sciences, is a co-author of the study. Other co-authors are Spanish researchers José María Bermúdez de Castro, Juan-Luis Arsuaga and Eudald Carbonell, co-directors of the excavations at Atapuerca sites. The study resulted from a collaboration that developed when Gómez-Robles spent a semester at IU studying with Polly while she was a graduate student at the National Research Centre for Human Evolution and at the University of Granada, both in Spain. It also makes use of statistical methods developed by IU Bloomington biologist Emilia Martins.
The article, "No known hominin species matches the expected dental morphology of the last common ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans," relies on fossils of approximately 1,200 molars and premolars from 13 species or types of hominins—humans and human relatives and ancestors. Fossils from the well-known Atapuerca sites have a crucial role in this research, accounting for more than 15 percent of the complete studied fossil collection.
The study also finds that the potential human ancestors discovered in Europe are morphologically closer to Neanderthals than to modern humans. This suggests the line leading to Neanderthals arose around 1 million years ago and the divergence of humans took place much earlier than previously thought. Other studies have placed the divergence around 350,000 years ago.
"The study tells us that there are still new hominin finds waiting to be made," Polly said. "Fossil finds from about 1 million years ago in Africa deserve close scrutiny as the possible ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans."
<snipped for brevity due to Topix character limitations. See link above for complete article.>
Cousins have an ancestor.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#102731 Oct 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>read your cult book, it will do you good to realize what a foolish cult you take your ideas from...
You made the claim. You need to back it and show it. Otherwise you are a liar with nothing to back you up.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#102732 Oct 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>googling toads in your spare time?
Unlike you I read all the time. Not just repeat what other people say.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102733 Oct 22, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you I read all the time. Not just repeat what other people say.
yeah sure, you ddin't just google that...

the bullshit meter spikes high when you talk...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102734 Oct 22, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
You made the claim. You need to back it and show it. Otherwise you are a liar with nothing to back you up.
like i really care what a little turd like you thinks...

you know its there...or maybe not, you often say the stupidest shit...

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#102735 Oct 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>like i really care what a little turd like you thinks...
you know its there...or maybe not, you often say the stupidest shit...
It does not matter what you think of me. I show you are a liar that only spews out lies that you cannot back up. That is for all to see. You just repeat trash you hear and have nothing to back it up. You are one of the sheeple of the world.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#102736 Oct 22, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO!
Ugh, not this again.
Why are so many of you atheists so biblically ignorant?
Big survey a year or two ago (I think by the Pew organization) found that atheists generally knew more about the Bible then Christians of all stripes.

Catholics came out on bottom of course because they don't seem to read the Bible much.

“Good day to you!”

Level 2

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#102737 Oct 22, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>You did? I must have missed it in all the debris. Are you sure I chose to ignore it? That doesn't seem like me. Oh my stars and garters.
Hearsay is not circumstantial evidence. This is exactly what you state with no qualification.
I pasted your question and gave my answer again. You missed that also. It explains how you confuse yourself so easily without anyone's help.

“USER BANNED”

Since: Oct 13

Posts removed by Topix

#102738 Oct 22, 2013
This universe, which is the same for all, has not been made by any god or man, but it always has been, is, and will be an ever-living fire, kindling itself by regular measures and going out by regular measures...

“Good day to you!”

Level 2

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#102739 Oct 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>the bible says it didn't rain until the noachian flood, so we know that can't be true...
The Bible says no such thing as you state it. The Bible states in Gen 7:4 that rain was going to be sent for an extended period of time. Meaning/insinuating rain was a common thing to Noah. But rain descending for 40 days and forty nights was an uncommon action.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#102740 Oct 22, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
True. We have Cain (or Marine) toads all over the place. Quite poisoning. A friend of mine had a small dog that killed one. Then the toad killed the dog.
Though I hold out hope that the local coyotes will eat some.
Is it that bad?

Anyway i still had a lemon issue. When do lemons turn yellow on tree.
You will not believe how serious it is!
Hot question on google...even limes turn yellow apparently.
https://www.google.nl/search...

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#102741 Oct 22, 2013
Must be meyer lemons then Woodtick.
That little sapling you got there will or rather can grow to 10 meters height.

http://www.ask.com/question/growing-meyer-lem...

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#102742 Oct 22, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible says no such thing as you state it. The Bible states in Gen 7:4 that rain was going to be sent for an extended period of time. Meaning/insinuating rain was a common thing to Noah. But rain descending for 40 days and forty nights was an uncommon action.
In a different thread we did the counting of days...somehow it does not all add up.
A textual thing. First a synopsis and then more detailed.
Literal readers keep adding.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#102743 Oct 22, 2013
Dawn in Miami wrote:
This universe, which is the same for all, has not been made by any god or man, but it always has been, is, and will be an ever-living fire, kindling itself by regular measures and going out by regular measures...
...yes?

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#102744 Oct 22, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Cousins have an ancestor.
Inclined to say yes, but that would be jumping the gun.
The possibility to add any opinion to that article Kong posted was limited.
But this was very cryptic even for you Aura.
So would you care to elaborate?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands of demonstrators protest Trump in Atl... 7 min Democrat 1,533
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 20 min I liked him 71,433
News Bizarre finish has Raptors crying foul after lo... 28 min AtlantaPharts 160
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 30 min wichita-rick 211,698
News College Football Star Arrested On Public Intoxi... 45 min StarPhartzz 2
Why Won't Men Admit They Wear Pantyhose? (Feb '10) 1 hr Mandy 344
Word Association (Mar '10) 1 hr Ship 21,861
Who Are You Missing Today? (Feb '12) 1 hr Enzo49 413
What Turns You Off? 4 hr Brandiiiiiiii 440
More from around the web