Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Comments (Page 4,843)

Showing posts 96,841 - 96,860 of112,787
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102345
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually if you noticed a number of those posts weren't even attacking fundies. I just thought it would be fun to take over the last 24 hours worth of threads for a bit.(shrug)
Which forum are you guys on?

Level 1

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102346
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MikeF wrote:
Neato.

Look at the "phylogenetic tree of life" chart.

Where's it lead to at the bottom?

Nowhere.....

Thanks for your help in demonstrating that there is no evidence for the common ancestor.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102347
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
If you call these opinions of yours "evidence against God", you're nuts.
Evidence against God is unnecessary. And impossible.

Just like the Cosmic Sheep.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102348
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That is a reputable site.
I said nothing in reference to linking only to scientific sites.
I'm not biased like y'all are.
Wrong, it is not a reputable site.

You lying fundamental moron. The very first claim was debunked over a hundred years ago. A reputable site does not use arguments that are over a hundred years dead.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102349
Oct 21, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya, you did give the answer. You just didn't read your own post very well.
The Bible says it was a talking serpent, not a snake. You own post of Genesis confirmed that.
You DO know that serpent doesn't always and only mean snake, right?
Then what does it mean exactly? Apparently you are unable to narrow down the precise definition as it is supposed to apply to the Bible.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102350
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That is a reputable site.
I said nothing in reference to linking only to scientific sites.
I'm not biased like y'all are.

Ah good, then we both agree that your site is not scientific. Then it appears we have reached a fundamental impass. We are only interested in scientific evidence. You, along with your non-scientific site is only interested apologetics which you personally find to be 'reputable'. Further discussion appears non-constructive.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102351
Oct 21, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Which forum are you guys on?
He was referring to the other day (my brief take over had disappeared now), but I post from the evolution forum. Threads are often cross-referenced across different forums, for instance this thread could be in the atheism forum.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102352
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Neato.
Look at the "phylogenetic tree of life" chart.
Where's it lead to at the bottom?
Nowhere.....
Thanks for your help in demonstrating that there is no evidence for the common ancestor.
What a Maroon!!

Need I say any more? Another lying idiot for Jesus who has no idea what evidence is.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102353
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
You are amazingly irrational, you buy into a theory with absolutely no evidence , then berate others for what you say is the same thing!
You are operating from a philosophically religious viewpoint, so please you and your ilk should stop hiding behind science. It doesn't support your beliefs with evidence
Oh hey Bo. Which theory are you referring to?

Remember there is no argument you have used that I have not refuted. Do you have something different to add or you still playing the Nelson Muntz routine and showing everyone how ignorant you are?

Since: Jul 10

Alpharetta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102354
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

I have not waded through the 97000 posts to make sure, but, I don't see many references to actual Creationist Research.

Sure there are lots of opinion pieces on the ToE, but sadly nothing on Creationist research.

Is that because they do none?

Also, the ToE could be falsified tomorrow, but that would not make any flavor of creationism a viable alternate.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102355
Oct 21, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
He was referring to the other day (my brief take over had disappeared now), but I post from the evolution forum. Threads are often cross-referenced across different forums, for instance this thread could be in the atheism forum.
And in the Offbeat Forum.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Tampa, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102356
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That is a reputable site.
Sure it is, bucko. Have you ever read any of the articles beside the one you mentioned? Ever examine any of the links on the site?

That you think this reputable speaks volumes about you.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
I said nothing in reference to linking only to scientific sites.
I'm not biased like y'all are.
Of course! Why would you want to use science to support your position. Much better to use your so-called 'reputable sites', huh?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102357
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh. Neat.
The theory [common ancestor] specifically postulates that all of the earth's known biota are genealogically related, much in the same way that siblings or cousins are related to one another. Thus, universal common ancestry entails the transformation of one species into another and, consequently, macroevolutionary history and processes involving the origin of higher taxa.
A theory postulating is not a fact.
Try again.
Where's your evidence of the, THE, common ancestor. You know, the first life where all other life came from.
It's not necessary. DNA alone demonstrates common ancestry (although there's plenty of other evidence besides). In order to argue against this your position requires you to claim that DNA works exactly how it's observed but at some undefined point in the past it stopped doing so due to the interference of a magic Jew. Given this fact it is highly disingenuous of you to be asking for evidence considering that evidence simply does not matter to your position one way in the slightest.

But then considering you've been dancing for 30+ pages over the definition of "serpent" your disingenuousness would certainly justify putting you under that same label.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Tampa, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102358
Oct 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Neato.
Look at the "phylogenetic tree of life" chart.
Where's it lead to at the bottom?
Nowhere.....
Thanks for your help in demonstrating that there is no evidence for the common ancestor.
I demonstrated nothing other than you inability to understand a very simple concept. Do you have to have everything explained to you like a 3rd grader? The bottom of the tree represent the emergence of life. Which is a scientifically unsettled question. Duh!
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102359
Oct 21, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe in creation through evolution.
All the evidence we have today suggests that life cannot create itself, therefore a creator is necessary.
Actually that's not the case. Go look at plants.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102360
Oct 21, 2013
 
bohart wrote:
You members of the Liars R us club will believe in anything no matter how stupid.
Can you leave the irony meters alone please Bo?
buckwheat

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102361
Oct 21, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Boy, atheists sure do spend a LOT of time on Jesus and Christianity...
lol
Check the title of the thread, christian. Do you expect atheists to discuss home improvement here? It gets a little derailed, but....

I won't presume to speak for all atheists, but I find christianity interesting . How intelligent, educated adults can believe in god is mind boggling. 2013 and people are still being fleeced by preachers who are no smarter, and in some cases not as smart, as they are. Generation after generation of parents have embedded this crap into the minds of their children and it goes on and on.

It's time to pull your head out of the sand and put this fairy tale where it belongs, with Santa, Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy. Grow the fcuk up. There is no god. Preachers should be ashamed of themselves, they know the truth. Otherwise they would be too afraid of hell to pass on this shit.

1000 foot jesus my ass.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102362
Oct 21, 2013
 
NDaBoonies wrote:
I have not waded through the 97000 posts to make sure, but, I don't see many references to actual Creationist Research.
Sure there are lots of opinion pieces on the ToE, but sadly nothing on Creationist research.
Is that because they do none?
Also, the ToE could be falsified tomorrow, but that would not make any flavor of creationism a viable alternate.
Hey!!

No fair using logic!

There is no true peer reviewed creation research. Creationists have invented their own "peer review". Stick around, sooner or later some creatard will link one of those hilarious articles.
buckwheat

Tulsa, OK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102363
Oct 21, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Then what does it mean exactly? Apparently you are unable to narrow down the precise definition as it is supposed to apply to the Bible.
Its' the bible, dude. It could mean naked neighbor wife. It works, nothing else makes any sense either.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102364
Oct 21, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
He was referring to the other day (my brief take over had disappeared now), but I post from the evolution forum. Threads are often cross-referenced across different forums, for instance this thread could be in the atheism forum.
yes, i pretty much stick to the US politics forum...political junkie..i'm seeking help for that...

i just wondered which forum you were talking about...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 96,841 - 96,860 of112,787
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

308 Users are viewing the Weird Forum right now

Search the Weird Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Driver stops to help ducklings, gets $100 ticket 2 min head shrinker 5
Change-one-of-six-letters (Dec '12) 2 min Doug77 3,062
~Things YOU Love Game~ (Oct '12) 4 min pizzed wife 3,788
CHANGE One letter CHANCE (Sep '08) 4 min Doug77 28,745
Change "1" letter =ONLY= (Oct '12) 7 min CJ Rocker 3,225
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 8 min SLACK 34,926
6 letter word ...change one letter game (Oct '08) 11 min CJ Rocker 25,552
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 55 min wondering 14,764
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr CJ Rocker 141,198
Woman Flees Topless After Being Caught Shoplifting 3 hr beatlesinthebog 29
The Night Owl Saloon (Jun '11) 3 hr Denny CranesPlace 15,584
•••
•••