Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216634 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#102442 Oct 21, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>i buy into no irrational theories, i just do not find it so amazing that life is made up of the most common elements of the universe that i need to invent some god. very simple.
Terrible attempt at evasion! No one is arguing about the elements of life are they? What you are avoiding is how these elements assembled and came to life, because there is no natural scientific explanation as to how this could have occurred. None. Therefore your belief has nothing to do with science.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102443 Oct 21, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
And, of course, alien abductions.
Were is Infinite Farce anyway? Off to a galaxy far, far away?
the fact that alien abductions were a societal phenomenon proved them false. but i guess the UFO freaks didn't get the message...

IF seems to have trans-dimensioned himself...travel well, ol' boy!

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#102444 Oct 21, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Blow Hard back to his "goo" posts. If I look up twit in the dictionary, will it have his picture?
I was talking to the sucking bone, a-hole.

Still writhing in the agonizing stupidity required to believe that wind blown molecules landing in tide driven seas created life?

Probably not , fools have to believe it.Cultist

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Lakeland, FL

#102445 Oct 21, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Anecdotal, testimonial... you know.
Select billboards, radio and cable stations, inhabitants of places called something like Hogpoot Holler, and the marquees in front of those buildings with the Cadillacs where it says "Preecher Porking Only".


Well, shucks! Praise the lord!

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#102446 Oct 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never disputed the common ancestor, I've only commented on the fact that there is no evidence of it's existence.
No, there is no evidence that life can create itself.
Wrong on both counts.

I gave you an article that listed 29 major sources of evidence for a common ancestor.

You are a lying denier. Either that or you are a total idiot that does not know what is and what is not evidence.

And there is evidence for abiogenesis too, I have listed one teeny tiny bit of it. There is much more. There is not enough to call abiogenesis a theory, yet.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102447 Oct 21, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Terrible attempt at evasion! No one is arguing about the elements of life are they? What you are avoiding is how these elements assembled and came to life, because there is no natural scientific explanation as to how this could have occurred. None. Therefore your belief has nothing to do with science.
i avoided nothing.

and your statement is incorrect. there is a a scientific explanation, no-one has repeated it yet.

we knew there was atomic fission, but until humans repeated it, it didn't exist?

our off your game, fool...

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#102448 Oct 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I have not disputed it, only the lack of evidence for it.
And as I said, not only is there evidence for it, I provided you with evidence for it. Denying a fact does not take away the fact.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102449 Oct 21, 2013
ugghhh.."you're off your game..."

do not spill beer on your keyboard....it stays sticky for a long, long time...

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#102450 Oct 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol, the Urey-Miller....
That was natural, huh?
Oh my, you keep proving to everyone that you are a moron.

The Urey-Miller experiment reproduced the Earth's early environment, so in that sense, yes it was natural.

Remember how I said that you are uneducated. You keep supplying evidence that supports my claim.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#102451 Oct 21, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I will answer you last claim first. You are wrong. There is plenty of evidence today that suggests life can rise naturally. There have been many creatard claims that have been proven wrong over the years. Would you care to be specific?
And what do you mean by "creation through evolution"? If you truly believe that then you believe in a common ancestor. And since you dispute a common ancestor it is fairly clear that you are lying.
Do you accept that we share a common ancestor with other apes? With other mammals? With other vertebrates? In other words do you draw an artificial line somewhere?
Puddle gooiest lie #2

"There is plenty of evidence today that SUGGESTS life can arise naturally"

It must be hidden in Aura's footlocker where he keeps the secret of life hidden.

There is absolutely none.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102452 Oct 21, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
I was talking to the sucking bone, a-hole.
Still writhing in the agonizing stupidity required to believe that wind blown molecules landing in tide driven seas created life?
Probably not , fools have to believe it.Cultist
still believing in the proven false god of your cult?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#102453 Oct 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
No it doesn't.
The theory behind common ancestry only postulates.
That isn't fact.
Wrong, it also offers tests that would show that the claim is incorrect. A theory has to have the possible seed of its own debunking, otherwise it is not really a theory.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Lakeland, FL

#102454 Oct 21, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Terrible attempt at evasion! No one is arguing about the elements of life are they? What you are avoiding is how these elements assembled and came to life, because there is no natural scientific explanation as to how this could have occurred. None. Therefore your belief has nothing to do with science.
How would YOU know??? The sum total of your scientific knowledge centers around puddles of goo. You have never made a decent argument beyond pre-school whining.

I have repeated challenged you to a serious discussion. All you respond with is idiotic comments. What a complete loser you are.

I'm slightly surprised that McDonald's lets you use their computer. But the, birds of a feather.

I'll take an Angus wrap with HOT fries to go, thank you very much. Here's a dollar towards your GED fund.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#102455 Oct 21, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>i avoided nothing.
and your statement is incorrect. there is a a scientific explanation, no-one has repeated it yet.
we knew there was atomic fission, but until humans repeated it, it didn't exist?
our off your game, fool...
I've noticed you Puddle people can't stay focused when confronted with the truth. Take a drink...

There is no natural scientific explanation for life beginning.

This is the truth.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#102456 Oct 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit. There's evidence of God all over the place. Thousands of testimonials are out there for you to read.
It may only be anecdotal evidence, but that's more evidence than abiogenesis has.
No, that is not true. Yes, anecdotal evidence is evidence, but it is just about the poorest evidence possible. There is no scientific evidence for God, there is scientific evidence for abiogenesis.

Too bad you have no clue what counts as scientific evidence.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Lakeland, FL

#102457 Oct 21, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
I was talking to the sucking bone, a-hole.
Public forum, a-hole breath.
bohart wrote:
Still writhing in the agonizing stupidity required to believe that wind blown molecules landing in tide driven seas created life?
Probably not , fools have to believe it.Cultist
Twit. Can't have a scientific discussion, can you? Just more pre-school drivel. Does you mommy get annoyed at all the drool on your t-shirts?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#102458 Oct 21, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
The usual from you,....nothing.
You are a liar for the goo, nothing more
I am more than willing to help you, you poor moron. But until you change your idiot a-hole attitude there is no point in trying to help you. Just remember that all of science agrees with me and none of it agrees with you. That should be a hint to even an idiot like you that you are wrong.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Lakeland, FL

#102459 Oct 21, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Puddle gooiest lie #2
"There is plenty of evidence today that SUGGESTS life can arise naturally"
It must be hidden in Aura's footlocker where he keeps the secret of life hidden.
There is absolutely none.
See? "Puddle goo!" "Puddle goo!" "Puddle goo!" "Puddle goo!"

Boring troll is boring. And stupid. And uneducated. And an embarrassment to humanity.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Lakeland, FL

#102460 Oct 21, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
I've noticed you Puddle people can't stay focused when confronted with the truth. Take a drink...
There is no natural scientific explanation for life beginning.
This is the truth.
Asked and answered. A-hole breath.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#102461 Oct 21, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
I've noticed you Puddle people can't stay focused when confronted with the truth. Take a drink...
There is no natural scientific explanation for life beginning.
This is the truth.
sure there is, it just hasn't been repeated. all the building blocks of life are throughout the universe, we just haven't seen them make life yet. obviously life did come from non-life.

again, your logic disproves atomic fission until the 40's...so we know it is wrong...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Two words only please! (Aug '08) 9 min Mr_FX 40,838
Start a sentence in alphabetical order.. 11 min Mr_FX 1,574
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 22 min Sam 67,105
*add A word / drop a word* (Nov '12) 32 min SweLL GirL 15,210
5 Letter Word, Change 1 Letter (Oct '15) 33 min SweLL GirL 5,317
Tell me a TRUTH (Dec '12) 36 min liam cul8r 1,187
GMGMike's Bar And Grill (Jan '10) 41 min liam cul8r 20,473
What Turns You Off (Jun '11) 1 hr Lucy the First 10,569
All Christmas Carols/Songs and Quotes.. 1 hr Emerald 49
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr Lucy the First 206,934
News Trump's bizarre claim that the Clinton email co... 3 hr freedom2016 984
More from around the web