Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 223189 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“ad victoriam”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#99891 Sep 22, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm comfortable with my statement as-is, and I'm sure Steven Hawkings would agree with me.
As well would Stephen Hawking, the physicist.
Actually it was Hawking that first said BH's could even even violate the some of the laws, so not only break down they fall apart.

But he took it back because other physicists arguing with him.
While some still contend Hawking was right about it to start with.
But all of us here with physics backgrounds know that physics laws
especially concerning GR break down in a singularity.

“Good day to you!”

Level 2

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#99892 Sep 22, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, now I see you're back to exaggerated BS. You're forgetting those EXCEEDINGLY serious flaws in your claims:
1 - As global water height increases the volume of water increases in proportion. You are claiming underwater reservoirs are enough to account for this, but that would make a highly significant portion of the crust would be floating upon water. In reality it's floating on magma. This is especially problematic due to the pressures of keeping this water contained, plus the fact that temperatures increase the further down you go. Your water is now steam and ready to explode at near nuclear levels. Not surprisingly, science does not support this.
2 - There is no mechanism for a sudden convenient flood to occur at this time.
3 - Again, the heat created from moving literally billions of tons of water in mass (and possibly landmasses too) will turn the Earth into another sun.
4 - Noah's boat is only made of wood. What you need is the USS Enterprise.
5 - Noah's family is not genetically viable to repopulate the entire Earth. If the crew numbered 50 or more then you'd probably be okay, however no-one would be okay if they're all crispy-critters.
6 - You are still attempting to justify Goddidit with magic. You don't NEED evidence. Evidence is irrelevant to your position.
<quoted text>
It's my opinion that the writer purposefully described a flat Earth. But that's when I'm told we're not meant to take the Bible THAT literally. At this point all we have are our opinions on how it is "meant" to be interpreted. This pretty much invalidates it from being useful as either a historical or scientific document.
If you wish to believe in "that can't happen" phrases have at it. I like to have an open mind, possibilities are nice whether they deal with myth or fact.
Maybe you should visit this link. http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2011/06/23/...
The reporter quotes the work of this scientist. http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/facu...

“Good day to you!”

Level 2

Since: Oct 08

Earth

#99893 Sep 22, 2013
Gillette wrote:
<quoted text>
The Ten-Percent Myth
http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percent...
Do we only use 10% of our brains?
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20121112-do-w...
Ten percent of brain myth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_percent_of_b...
Not. We don't use our full potential in creative thought. That's a simple fact. If we used 100% of our creative thought, the combustion engine would have been created thousands of years ago along with trips to the moon, mars and wherever else we wanted to go and we would have figured a way to make a device(s) to allow us to dive and stay as long as we wished in the deepest depths of any sea/ocean.
Know the difference and understand this difference. The brian for most functions at a 100% level. Creative thought works at less than a 10% level for any one individual. People like Da Vinci and Einstein were the exception to the 10%. And people like Da Vinci and Einstein are examples of what we all could/can be if we used our creative thought as they did. But it doesn't happen. Get it?

“ad victoriam”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#99894 Sep 22, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
If you wish to believe in "that can't happen" phrases have at it. I like to have an open mind, possibilities are nice whether they deal with myth or fact.
Maybe you should visit this link. http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2011/06/23/...
The reporter quotes the work of this scientist. http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/facu...
It is still a physical impossibility that water could cover the entire Earth to a depth over 29,000 ft above sea level.
It doesn't make any difference what you believe.
Water is only 0.02% of Earth. It is actually rare, but it is all on the surface, so it doesn't seem rare.

If all of Earth were flat , water would be cover the surface to a depth of 2.7 km. or about 9,000 ft.
Everest is 29,000 ft. There are over 100 mountains with heights of over 7,200 m (23,622 ft) above sea level, so you see the problem with saying a flood covered them all ?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#99895 Sep 22, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>Actually it was Hawking that first said BH's could even even violate the some of the laws, so not only break down they fall apart.

But he took it back because other physicists arguing with him.
While some still contend Hawking was right about it to start with.
But all of us here with physics backgrounds know that physics laws
especially concerning GR break down in a singularity.
My point was •KNOWN• laws are broken. Physical properties of the universe with which we are not yet familiar and that we cannot yet explain, cannot be "broken laws".

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#99896 Sep 22, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
Not. We don't use our full potential in creative thought. That's a simple fact. If we used 100% of our creative thought, the combustion engine would have been created thousands of years ago along with trips to the moon, mars and wherever else we wanted to go and we would have figured a way to make a device(s) to allow us to dive and stay as long as we wished in the deepest depths of any sea/ocean.
Know the difference and understand this difference. The brian for most functions at a 100% level. Creative thought works at less than a 10% level for any one individual. People like Da Vinci and Einstein were the exception to the 10%. And people like Da Vinci and Einstein are examples of what we all could/can be if we used our creative thought as they did. But it doesn't happen. Get it?
Sources for your assertions grasshopper?? Or is this just your 'gut feeling'?

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#99897 Sep 22, 2013
No Surprise wrote:
<quoted text>
If you wish to believe in "that can't happen" phrases have at it. I like to have an open mind, possibilities are nice whether they deal with myth or fact.
Maybe you should visit this link. http://www.npr.org/blogs/krulwich/2011/06/23/...
The reporter quotes the work of this scientist. http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/facu...
If you will notice the scientist is not backed up by anyone, has no peer review paper in the journals, is just basically putting a 'hypothesis' out there.

You may be reading way too much significance into this story. It's a new assertion and it must have time to come to fruition...if it can.
spOko

Oakland, CA

#99898 Sep 22, 2013

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#99899 Sep 22, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>

With out invoking magic.
You do understand there is no such thing as magic, don't you??

Level 2

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#99900 Sep 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
You do understand there is no such thing as magic, don't you??
Christine O'Donnell turned me into a newt!
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99901 Sep 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>So, you are presenting your new-found knowledge to the science journals for peer review....right?
You don't like this?

You doubt these statements?
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99902 Sep 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>What kind of phone do you have....so I can stay away from one like it.
iPhone
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99903 Sep 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>Obviously not. Last time I checked the laws were still on the books.

:-)
In the QUOTE from Steven Hawkings
For him to explain the start of time he had to remove all the laws of physic for time to happen. Now seeing that you think you know more then him you feel free to explain time within the laws of physics. Hawkings needed magic for time to come into existence, what do you need?
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99904 Sep 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>You write:
"Science can't explain.
Life
The universe
With out invoking magic.
That's rather big."

Like I said, we don't know it all at the same time....we're working on it.

Give it a rest.

You're knowledge base stopped 2,000 years ago.
Give what a rest?
Defending my belief when under attack?

Or just plane embarrassing science with facts.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99905 Sep 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>Different subject....

By the way, what do you think of the recent discovery that humans and Neanderthals are blood relatives, and were sharing the earth for tens of thousands of years?
What do you think of banana's sharing 50% of our DNA?

We must have been banana's at one time! LOL

Similar designs is evidence of a common creator.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99906 Sep 22, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>I'm comfortable with my statement as-is, and I'm sure Steven Hawkings would agree with me.

As well would Stephen Hawking, the physicist.
I'll ask Steve baby and let you know.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99907 Sep 22, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>Actually it was Hawking that first said BH's could even even violate the some of the laws, so not only break down they fall apart.

But he took it back because other physicists arguing with him.
While some still contend Hawking was right about it to start with.
But all of us here with physics backgrounds know that physics laws
especially concerning GR break down in a singularity.
GR breaks down in more places then that.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99908 Sep 22, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>You do understand there is no such thing as magic, don't you??
You do understand that every time science claims all the laws of physics break down then this happened. Is a call for magic. In other words an impossibility.

Time existence is an impossibility!

Got it?

I've try to point this out to you just about every way I can think of.

Level 2

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#99909 Sep 22, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you think of banana's sharing 50% of our DNA?
We must have been banana's at one time! LOL
Similar designs is evidence of a common creator.
A banana has a similar design to a human penis while erect. That is evidence that God wants you to treat a penis like a banana by holding it in your hand or possible your mouth.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#99910 Sep 22, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll ask Steve baby and let you know.
Great!

And I'll ask Stephen should I ever run into him.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Denny Crain's Place (May '10) 4 min Sublime1 32,045
Two words only please! (Aug '08) 49 min andet1987 41,900
Make A Sentance out of a 5 letter word. (Nov '09) 52 min andet1987 38,881
News Longtime State Rep. Karen Clark Won't Seek Re-E... 53 min cowboy chris 4
2words into 2new words (May '12) 56 min andet1987 8,906
Create "short sentences using the last word" (Aug '12) 59 min andet1987 11,418
News The Earth is making a very weird noise, and sci... 1 hr andet1987 3
~Things YOU Love Game~ (Oct '12) 2 hr andet1987 4,026
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 7 hr Mustang GT Girl 225,968
Poll What are you thinking right now? (May '08) 7 hr quilterqueen 6,709
More from around the web