Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Park City, Utah

#99187 Sep 3, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Not too knowledgeable are you then?
I get along OK my friend.

Try learning 'about' the Bible instead of what's 'in' the Bible.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Park City, Utah

#99188 Sep 3, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes
What proof would that be Tzar??

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#99189 Sep 3, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes
please state this proof...

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#99190 Sep 3, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>please state this proof...
I went looking for it since Tater is not too likely to post any.

All I could find is some very poor apologetics bringing up some of the worst failures of the Bible. One brought up the Tyre prophesy of all things to bring up, the worst failed prophesy in the whole Bible. Another mentioned the verse that describes the Earth as a flat circle and said it meant the Earth was a sphere, and without any evidence to back up that claim. Another said there were no contradictions in the Bible when I have a website that lists over 400.

So Tater, if you have any evidence it better be amazing.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#99191 Sep 3, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I went looking for it since Tater is not too likely to post any.
All I could find is some very poor apologetics bringing up some of the worst failures of the Bible. One brought up the Tyre prophesy of all things to bring up, the worst failed prophesy in the whole Bible. Another mentioned the verse that describes the Earth as a flat circle and said it meant the Earth was a sphere, and without any evidence to back up that claim. Another said there were no contradictions in the Bible when I have a website that lists over 400.
So Tater, if you have any evidence it better be amazing.
Tater? who is tater? the Tzar/langoliers/can't even be bothered to recall his other monikers guy? shouldn't he be tater-tot?

have you read the book Zealot, by Reza Aslan? sounds really interesting, our local public radio station did an interview with him today and it sounds like a very informative read.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#99192 Sep 3, 2013
oh yeah...MPR...you're a Minneeesohtahhhn...

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#99193 Sep 3, 2013
Since "The Almighty Tzar" has not shown himself to be any brighter than Mr. Potatohead I thought Tater was an apt moniker for him.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#99194 Sep 3, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
Since "The Almighty Tzar" has not shown himself to be any brighter than Mr. Potatohead I thought Tater was an apt moniker for him.
i still like tater-tot. I'm not sure he has enough starch in his head to be a full tater...

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Park City, Utah

#99195 Sep 3, 2013
Biggest scam on earth.
Huh

Owatonna, MN

#99196 Sep 4, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes
Show it then...

OH THIS SHOULD BE FUNNY....AND A LIE.

SBT
Level 2

Since: Jun 13

United States

#99197 Sep 4, 2013
Dark Matter Lost. "Of late Astronomers mapped the motions of hundreds of stars in the Milky Way in order to deduce the amount of dark matter that must be tugging on them from the vicinity of our sun. Their surprising conclusion? There's no dark matter around here".
As the researchers write in a forthcoming paper in the Astrophysical Journal, the stellar motion implies that the stars, all within 13,000 light-years of Earth, are gravitationally attracted by the visible material in our solar system — the sun, planets and surrounding gas and dust — and not by any unseen matter.
"Our calculations show that [dark matter] should have shown up very clearly in our measurements. But it was just not there!"
"One possibility is that dark matter is not the correct explanation for stellar and galactic motions. Perhaps the current understanding of the laws of physics is slightly off".
Just slightly! Doesn’t this illustrate that many secularists are willing to believe in something that cannot be seen, heard, touched, or detected in any way by the most elaborate equipment, yet they 'believe' in dark matter because they need it to explain their concept of the universe. Even on the eve of the CERN accelerator no-find of DM, such a faith supports their absolute; that of understanding all nature without God. And yet many of those same secularists would reject a belief in God on the basis that He cannot be directly observed!

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2012/07/...

http://www.space.com/15345-dark-matter-altern...

So here we go on another ride, theorists get an idea and publish it long enough it moves out of the category of "hypothesis" to "theory" then into the heads of a believing public, with no scientific basis at all. So now, when the physical evidence comes up missing their faith carries them into more hopeful delusions,(and more grants), now that they got a believing public to swallow the bait. But heck, it's hard work trying to keep a young universe from flying apart.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#99198 Sep 4, 2013
SBT wrote:
And yet many of those same secularists would reject a belief in God on the basis that He cannot be directly observed!
So you admit your god cannot be observed and that your alternative is not scientific and that evidence is not even relevant to your position?

Which would uh, make your entire post irrelevant.

Level 2

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#99199 Sep 4, 2013
freddy wrote:
Titties are fun!
Let's see the evidence.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99200 Sep 4, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>Where was your mention of time in this nonsense?

The Almighty Tzar wrote, "<quoted text>
Yes I do believe they are all MYTHS.
You believe they are fact.
Your 3 BIG Myths:
1) the Big Bang when nothing exploded
and created everything.
2) rain falling on rocks and settling in a mud puddle and spontaneous self generating life sprang forth.
3) plants evolving into plant eating animals.
And when I snap my fingers you will wake up and believe these 3 myths as if they were fact.
"SNAP""

Or are you just trying to change the subject to avoid addressing your obvious mistakes?
No mistake Mikey.
Time is proof of God.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99201 Sep 4, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>I get along OK my friend.

Try learning 'about' the Bible instead of what's 'in' the Bible.
What about science?

Where did time come from?
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99202 Sep 4, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>What proof would that be Tzar??
Time
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99203 Sep 4, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>I went looking for it since Tater is not too likely to post any.

All I could find is some very poor apologetics bringing up some of the worst failures of the Bible. One brought up the Tyre prophesy of all things to bring up, the worst failed prophesy in the whole Bible. Another mentioned the verse that describes the Earth as a flat circle and said it meant the Earth was a sphere, and without any evidence to back up that claim. Another said there were no contradictions in the Bible when I have a website that lists over 400.

So Tater, if you have any evidence it better be amazing.
It's time sub par. You remember don't you. You claim that time could not pop into existence, to do so would require time. a bit of a paradox for you. But we know how time was created. And we have proof that time does in fact exist.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99204 Sep 4, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Tater? who is tater? the Tzar/langoliers/can't even be bothered to recall his other monikers guy? shouldn't he be tater-tot?

have you read the book Zealot, by Reza Aslan? sounds really interesting, our local public radio station did an interview with him today and it sounds like a very informative read.
Idiot. KJV was my old handle.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99205 Sep 4, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
Since "The Almighty Tzar" has not shown himself to be any brighter than Mr. Potatohead I thought Tater was an apt moniker for him.
Write that down----- could be the fist time for that. " I thought"

We of course would need to see some sign of brain activity in order to believe this claim.

“If It Is Possible”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

It Will Likely Happen

#99206 Sep 4, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
What about science?
Where did time come from?
Just a guess but I would say in a simple definition that science came from curiosity, exploration/experimenting, study and understanding of ones surroundings, trial, error and knowledge learned from all the above.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Change "1" letter =ONLY= (Oct '12) 4 min Old Sam 4,941
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 5 min ms_Sweeter 158,088
What's your tip for the day? (Jul '14) 7 min Old Sam 1,998
Rest in Peace, Spock 8 min Crazy Beautiful 338
Change 1 letter game! (Nov '11) 9 min Old Sam 3,731
Last Post Wins! (Aug '08) 9 min mr goodwrench 139,285
6 letter word ...change one letter game (Oct '08) 11 min Doug77 27,593
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 45 min Radical Miracle 39,442
Name a smell you love to smell! (Jan '14) 3 hr Mega Monster 846
More from around the web