Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story

“A Idiot Thinks Im Savoir Faire”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Paranoid That I Am Everywhere

#98998 Aug 28, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I am waiting to see if you can ever come up with a valid complaint.
I ignore the copy and paste of debunked creatard articles.
So do you have anything yet idiot?
Like I said in another thread. What you don't realize is that while you say their creation sites are BS, it is what they believe. And while you say your science sites are the truth it is what you believe. You show science sites to back your claim and they show creation sites to back theirs. In the eyes of the opposing team the site has to be wrong because they are using sites that back their claim.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Sharjah, UAE

#98999 Aug 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
How do we not know time and space didn't already existed long before the BBT, collapsed in on itself and got compressed smaller (like going from one end of the hour glass to the other. The smallness in the bottle neck it has to cross to become into largeness again) space and time was still there, just slowed. Maybe the big bang was space re-expanding again. I am not saying this happened, but we never know.
We don't. Its a possibility as physicists will acknowledge. But we cannot assume that even the fundamental laws are the same prebottleneck. This is where We Don't Know (but we are looking for ways to find out) becomes the appropriate answer. Not We Don't Know Therefore God. That was dumb applied to lightning and smallpox and its dumb when applied to any area of current ignorance.

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#99000 Aug 29, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
I see that Tater is still an idiot.
One question, does anyone know why he keeps trumpeting his ignorance?
Apparently, that's all he has to work with.

“See how you are?”

Level 5

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#99001 Aug 29, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
You want something to really laugh at try this on for size......
..........
Gen.1:11-14
I'm not laughing with you, I'm laughing at you.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#99002 Aug 29, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
So was the Big Bang an explosion?
Or not?
About 15 billion years ago a tremendous explosion started the expansion of the universe. This explosion is known as the Big Bang
http://www.umich.edu/~gs265/bigbang.htm
Astronomers Detect Most Powerful Explosion Since Big Bang
18 May 1998
The energy released in a cosmic gamma-rayburst detected in December 1997 is the most energy ever detected from an explosion in theUniverse, perhaps making it the most powerful explosion since the creation of the Universe in the Big Bang.
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/ne...
big bang
(bg)
The explosion of an extremely small, hot, and dense body of matter that, according to some cosmological theories, gave rise to the universe between 12 and 20 billion years ago.
Most astronomers now believe that the universe began around 12 billion years ago in a cataclysmic explosion we call the Big Bang
Most astronomers now believe that the universe began around 12 billion years ago in a cataclysmic explosion we call the Big Bang
http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/records-1...
I gave up after the first poorly written article.

The Big Bang was not first proposed by Hubble but by Georges Lemaître. The article also refers to it was an 'explosion'- which it was not - but later tries to back off that terminology.

BTW, Guinness appears to be out of date. 13.8 Billion years ago.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#99003 Aug 29, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
You're kind of a blooming idiot aren't you?
If you really want to talk about con jobs lets look at your big three.
Your 3 BIG Myths:
1) the Big Bang when nothing exploded
and created everything.
2) rain falling on rocks and settling in a mud puddle and spontaneous self generating life sprang forth.
3) plants evolving into plant eating animals.
BZZZZZ! Sorry, no. Those are *YOUR* big myths, Mr Strawman.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#99004 Aug 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said in another thread. What you don't realize is that while you say their creation sites are BS, it is what they believe. And while you say your science sites are the truth it is what you believe. You show science sites to back your claim and they show creation sites to back theirs. In the eyes of the opposing team the site has to be wrong because they are using sites that back their claim.
And you see no difference between the evidence & arguments of the science type and the creationists?

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#99005 Aug 29, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
No not at all I'm a scientist.
But with your statement you have shown you are willing to lie for personal gain.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#99006 Aug 29, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
You're kind of a blooming idiot aren't you?
If you really want to talk about con jobs lets look at your big three.
Your 3 BIG Myths:
1) the Big Bang when nothing exploded
and created everything.
2) rain falling on rocks and settling in a mud puddle and spontaneous self generating life sprang forth.
3) plants evolving into plant eating animals.
Are you going back and re-replying to posts, or is your memory so short that you have forgotted that you already replied to this?

You have posted this same opinion numerous times and many have replied with real basis, but you ignore the replies and re-post the same bs.

But this time you've caught yourself in a snarl. Just one page ago you stated factually that you "are a scientist". I know of no real scientist that would challenge the three points you refer to in the manner you have. Some REAL scientists may not completely agree with some of the theories, but None would be so unprofessional to call these 3 points a "con job"

You sir, are a phony, case closed.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#99007 Aug 29, 2013
Edit: Forgotten
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#99008 Aug 29, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
I'm a scientist
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/3278/funnypict...
glox

Melrose Park, IL

#99009 Aug 29, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
What?
"Contact" will never happen applying human thought in its current forms....understand?
spOko

Oakland, CA

#99010 Aug 29, 2013
glox wrote:
<quoted text> "Contact" will never happen applying human thought in its current forms....understand?
LOL ... and you know that because??

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99011 Aug 29, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>Dude.

Josh Rubak?

Who the hell is he?

Using his website to hawk "Screen Plays"?
and "Investment Opportunities"?

Really?
You didn't enjoy that?

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99012 Aug 29, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>We call it repeat spam attacks.
We? You have a mouse in your pocket?

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99013 Aug 29, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>AM is a coward, you will get no where fast with that lunch box.
Yes I know about a-Myth.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99014 Aug 29, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>I am waiting to see if you can ever come up with a valid complaint.

I ignore the copy and paste of debunked creatard articles.

So do you have anything yet idiot?
Yes dolt.

I'm still waiting on your reasoning as to how Time came into existence.

Rules are you must stay in expectable scientific theory's.

Science knows that nothing can exist outside of time.
Science knows nothing can happen with out time.
Science knows time started 13.7 billion years ago.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99015 Aug 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>Like I said in another thread. What you don't realize is that while you say their creation sites are BS, it is what they believe. And while you say your science sites are the truth it is what you believe. You show science sites to back your claim and they show creation sites to back theirs. In the eyes of the opposing team the site has to be wrong because they are using sites that back their claim.
These dolts can't figure this out.
We go to these site because they have already done the foot work on the item that continue to be brought up on these threads. One does grow tired of the same old stupid claims.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99016 Aug 29, 2013
TerryL wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently, that's all he has to work with.
Oh ya ha ha ha boy terry aren't the bright bulb.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#99017 Aug 29, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>Gen.1:11-14
I'm not laughing with you, I'm laughing at you.
Genesis 1:

In the beginning

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Word Association (Mar '10) 18 min beatlesinthebog 16,108
Make a Story / 4 Words Only (Nov '08) 20 min beatlesinthebog 24,567
True or False Game 20 min Sublime1 365
If you could live in a book ~ 21 min Sally Brown 3
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 24 min beatlesinthebog 6,350
Last Post Wins! (Aug '08) 27 min beatlesinthebog 137,899
OSCAR PISTORIUS - your opinion> 28 min Grace Nerissa 4
Do you have a Topix crush? (Jun '11) 43 min Juju Beans 6,829
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr Bree_Z 148,954
During Obama's Speech at Democratic Campaign Ra... 2 hr evidently 19
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 3 hr Sublime1 22,214

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE