Your blogger source might find his simplistic thinking challenged by distant relatives like horse/donkey and lion/tiger. More so by Ring Species. But I suspect he has never even heard of them.http://www.garnertedarmstrong.org/pubs/evolut...
"Evolutionist are fond of pointing to "MICRO-evolution," meaning the many VARIETIES within a kind, and applying it to their theory that a kind evolved from a different kind! This is utterly untrue. Whether pygmy or gigantic Swede, they are both human beings, and inter-fertile. Whether a snowshoe rabbit is white in the winter or brown in the summer, it is still a snowshoe rabbit, and is not in the process of becoming a whale, or a horse, or a monkey.
Nor does his blind insight offer any reasonable explanation for the convergence between different "kinds" that we see in the fossil record. Mammal-like reptiles showing the sequence of development of the 3-boned middle ear in mammals, 30+ dino/avian fossils that mix features of each group, not to mention tiktaalik, or Homo Erectus for that matter.
Nah, just ignore all that. Does this fool ever get anything right?