Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.
Comments
90,241 - 90,260 of 113,153 Comments Last updated 32 min ago

“Robert Stevens”

Level 1

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95452
Jul 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>What a brilliant, on point rebuttal. You have torn his entire argument to shreds. I doubt he will have the strength or desire to post here ever again after so scathing a dressing down as this.
It is a shame too, but when a rebuttal like yours rips out the very heart of an argument, it is all over but the crying.
Well done.
Giving you clowns made so many long winded post her on this very out dated and very over posted topic thread, I actually believe you are not being sarcastic, and if you say otherwise I wouldn't buy it. I know you guys go from conversation to conversation about this. Really you guys do need to get a life. The bird watches are way more interesting. Go count the birds you spot for a year. It'd be much more rewarding.

“I have upset the hand of god”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Threats pending

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95453
Jul 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
Giving you clowns made so many long winded post her on this very out dated and very over posted topic thread, I actually believe you are not being sarcastic, and if you say otherwise I wouldn't buy it. I know you guys go from conversation to conversation about this. Really you guys do need to get a life. The bird watches are way more interesting. Go count the birds you spot for a year. It'd be much more rewarding.
I do? You are so right. I have reviewed the last few decades of my life which must be so apparent to a gentleman of your education and quality and you are right. I just don't know what to do now that you have exposed me. I mean sure there is science and chicks, but what about underwater ballroom dancing or sudden impact simulation? There is too much for me to choose from. What do you think about full contact, egregiously heterosexual, bird watching? Or maybe top ranked television chef combined with self mutilation? I just don't know where to begin or what to choose.

Nice talking with you on Topix.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95455
Jul 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
Giving you clowns made so many long winded post her on this very out dated and very over posted topic thread, I actually believe you are not being sarcastic, and if you say otherwise I wouldn't buy it. I know you guys go from conversation to conversation about this. Really you guys do need to get a life. The bird watches are way more interesting. Go count the birds you spot for a year. It'd be much more rewarding.
you have something against birders? probably because watching birds can point out the facts of evolution, huh?
Drink The HiVe

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95456
Jul 20, 2013
 
The Egyptian' Believed That Some Soul' Become Suns In Orion And Many Are Devoured In Draco...

https://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://files.shroomery.org/avatars/www.shroom...

“Robert Stevens”

Level 1

Since: Dec 08

Jersey City , NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95494
Jul 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>you have something against birders? probably because watching birds can point out the facts of evolution, huh?
Not at all most of my point is this crowd really needs to get out. I would wager that some of the posters here are over 500 pounds. The attraction of atheism and online is crazy. At the very least have this conversation evolve. The Fundamentalist Christians have grown bored with you, my guess is the are out doors cooking while you ramble on as you do. You believe you only have one life, you should do better than this with it.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95495
Jul 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all most of my point is this crowd really needs to get out. I would wager that some of the posters here are over 500 pounds. The attraction of atheism and online is crazy. At the very least have this conversation evolve. The Fundamentalist Christians have grown bored with you, my guess is the are out doors cooking while you ramble on as you do. You believe you only have one life, you should do better than this with it.
my life is quite full, thank you...

i probably read more novels and other books, and practice my guitar while hacking on this site than you do the rest of your life...

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95496
Jul 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all most of my point is this crowd really needs to get out. I would wager that some of the posters here are over 500 pounds. The attraction of atheism and online is crazy. At the very least have this conversation evolve. The Fundamentalist Christians have grown bored with you, my guess is the are out doors cooking while you ramble on as you do. You believe you only have one life, you should do better than this with it.
Yet here you are.

Congratulations, hypocrite.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Lakeland, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95497
Jul 21, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Robert Stevens wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all most of my point is this crowd really needs to get out. I would wager that some of the posters here are over 500 pounds
170, thank you very much.
Robert Stevens wrote:
The attraction of atheism and online is crazy. At the very least have this conversation evolve. The Fundamentalist Christians have grown bored with you...
TFB
Robert Stevens wrote:
...my guess is the are out doors cooking while you ramble on as you do.
Actually, at the moment, I am helping with a large fundraiser for the Volunteers Assisting Veterans. Very worthy organization.
Robert Stevens wrote:
You believe you only have one life, you should do better than this with it.
Better than what? Raising money for veterans. What are you doing for your fellow man this afternoon? Besides bitching at us, I mean.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95499
Jul 23, 2013
 
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>That seems to be the view of many modern Christians.
Don't think so dan.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95500
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

This argument has come to an end by implying the "Universal Law Of Non-Contradiction."

The theory of evolution is a contradictory philosophy and the scientific method is flawed!

By applying the universal law of non-contradiction (because nature does not contradict its self) you are either/or when it comes to a biological reproductive species.

Changing from one biological reproductive species to an opposite/incompatible biological reproductive species over time is a violation of the universal law of non-contradiction.
You people need to know when to say when on an argument!

"The Flawless Scientific Law And Method That Detects Contradictory Information That Is Not Lined Up When Used To Explain How Nature Works, Because Nature Does Not Contradict It’s Self And Neither Should The Information Used To Explain How Nature Works By Scientist, Researchers, Individuals And Political World Governments Which Uses Information To Instruct And Govern Humanity with In The Ecological Environment We Live In"

>>>> http://www.natureinforce.org/science-nature-i...

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95501
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

How is evolution contradictory?

I can assure you Infinite Force you are in error.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95502
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Subduction Zone wrote:
How is evolution contradictory?

I can assure you Infinite Force you are in error.
Contradictory Trees: Evolution Goes 0 For 1,070

One of evolution’s trade secrets is its prefiltering of data to make it look good, but now evolutionists are resorting to postfiltering of the data as well. Evolutionists have always claimed that the different species fall into a common descent pattern forming an evolutionary tree. That is, the various traits—from the overall body plan down to the DNA molecular sequences—from the various species, consistently reveal the same evolutionary pattern. If one gene shows species A and B are closely related and species C is more distantly related, then the other genes will reveal the same pattern. Evolutionists call this consilience. In practice however, this consilience is superficial. There are profound contradictions between the different traits, and in a new attempt evolutionists just set a new record for failure: out of 1,070 genes, every single one contradicted the hoped for evolutionary tree, as well as each other. 1,070 different genes and 1,070 different evolutionary trees. Consequently evolutionists are now manipulating the data even more than before to obtain the desired results.

These days when evolutionists compare species they usually use molecular sequence data, such as genes. But what if a particular type of gene is found in species A but not in species B? Obviously this constitutes a big difference between these two species. It is not as though the gene merely is different to some extent. It is altogether missing from one of the species. Nonetheless, the typical strategy in such cases is simply to drop that particular gene from the data set. That big difference is, in a stroke, eliminated from the analysis. This is one type of prefiltering evolutionists use.

Prefiltering is often thought of merely as cleaning up the data. But prefiltering is more than that, for built-in to the prefiltering steps is the theory of evolution. Prefiltering massages the data to favor the theory. The data are, as philosophers explain, theory-laden.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95503
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Subduction Zone wrote:
How is evolution contradictory?

I can assure you Infinite Force you are in error.
Part 2

But even prefiltering cannot always help the theory. For even cleansed data routinely lead to evolutionary trees that are incongruent (the opposite of consilience). As one study explained, the problem is so confusing that results “can lead to high confidence in incorrect hypotheses.” And although evolutionists thought that more data would solve their problems, the opposite has occurred. With the ever increasing volumes of data (particularly molecular data), incongruence between trees “has become pervasive.”

This problem became all the more obvious in a new study that examined 1,070 different genes found in a couple dozen yeast species (yes, the data were prefiltered). All those genes taken together produced one evolutionary tree, but each of the 1,070 different genes produced a different tree—1,070 plus 1 different trees. It was, as one evolutionistadmitted “a bit shocking.”

Or as another evolutionist put it,“We are trying to figure out the phylogenetic relationships of 1.8 million species and can’t even sort out 20 [types of] yeast.”

Clearly something is amiss and for evolutionists it cannot be the theory. That means it must be the data. The solution is postfiltering, to go along with the prefiltering. Whereas evolutionists once assured themselves that their problems would go away when more data became available, they now are headed in exactly the opposite direction.

What is needed now is less data. Specifically, less contradictory data. As one evolutionist explained,“if you take just the strongly supported genes, then you recover the correct tree.” And what are “strongly supported” genes? Those would be genes that cooperate with the theory. So now in addition to prefiltering we have postfiltering. We might say that the data now are theory-laden-laden. Evolutionists will be eliminating the uncooperative genes and retaining those genes with what evolutionists euphemistically refer to as “strong phylogenetic signals.”

Then they can tell us again that evolution is a fact because the evidence says so.

That’s just the stuff of good solid scientific investigation.
http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2013/06/contr...

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95504
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Subduction Zone wrote:
How is evolution contradictory?

I can assure you Infinite Force you are in error.
Contradictory Trees: Evolution Goes 0 For 1,070

One of evolution’s trade secrets is its prefiltering of data to make it look good, but now evolutionists are resorting to postfiltering of the data as well. Evolutionists have always claimed that the different species fall into a common descent pattern forming an evolutionary tree. That is, the various traits—from the overall body plan down to the DNA molecular sequences—from the various species, consistently reveal the same evolutionary pattern. If one gene shows species A and B are closely related and species C is more distantly related, then the other genes will reveal the same pattern. Evolutionists call this consilience. In practice however, this consilience is superficial. There are profound contradictions between the different traits, and in a new attempt evolutionists just set a new record for failure: out of 1,070 genes, every single one contradicted the hoped for evolutionary tree, as well as each other. 1,070 different genes and 1,070 different evolutionary trees. Consequently evolutionists are now manipulating the data even more than before to obtain the desired results.

These days when evolutionists compare species they usually use molecular sequence data, such as genes. But what if a particular type of gene is found in species A but not in species B? Obviously this constitutes a big difference between these two species. It is not as though the gene merely is different to some extent. It is altogether missing from one of the species. Nonetheless, the typical strategy in such cases is simply to drop that particular gene from the data set. That big difference is, in a stroke, eliminated from the analysis. This is one type of prefiltering evolutionists use.

Prefiltering is often thought of merely as cleaning up the data. But prefiltering is more than that, for built-in to the prefiltering steps is the theory of evolution. Prefiltering massages the data to favor the theory. The data are, as philosophers explain, theory-laden.

http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2013/06/contr...

“I have upset the hand of god”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Threats pending

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95505
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Contradictory Trees: Evolution Goes 0 For 1,070
One of evolution’s trade secrets is its prefiltering of data to make it look good, but now evolutionists are resorting to postfiltering of the data as well. Evolutionists have always claimed that the different species fall into a common descent pattern forming an evolutionary tree. That is, the various traits—from the overall body plan down to the DNA molecular sequences—from the various species, consistently reveal the same evolutionary pattern. If one gene shows species A and B are closely related and species C is more distantly related, then the other genes will reveal the same pattern. Evolutionists call this consilience. In practice however, this consilience is superficial. There are profound contradictions between the different traits, and in a new attempt evolutionists just set a new record for failure: out of 1,070 genes, every single one contradicted the hoped for evolutionary tree, as well as each other. 1,070 different genes and 1,070 different evolutionary trees. Consequently evolutionists are now manipulating the data even more than before to obtain the desired results.
These days when evolutionists compare species they usually use molecular sequence data, such as genes. But what if a particular type of gene is found in species A but not in species B? Obviously this constitutes a big difference between these two species. It is not as though the gene merely is different to some extent. It is altogether missing from one of the species. Nonetheless, the typical strategy in such cases is simply to drop that particular gene from the data set. That big difference is, in a stroke, eliminated from the analysis. This is one type of prefiltering evolutionists use.
Prefiltering is often thought of merely as cleaning up the data. But prefiltering is more than that, for built-in to the prefiltering steps is the theory of evolution. Prefiltering massages the data to favor the theory. The data are, as philosophers explain, theory-laden.
http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2013/06/contr...
Can you explain this in layman's terms? Maybe I will understand what you are trying to say better.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95506
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Can you explain this in layman's terms? Maybe I will understand what you are trying to say better.
It appears to be a misinterpretation of this article:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23657258

“I have upset the hand of god”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Threats pending

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95508
Jul 23, 2013
 
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't think so dan.
I would say you are half right.

“I have upset the hand of god”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Threats pending

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95509
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
It appears to be a misinterpretation of this article:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23657258
Thanks for the link SZ. I have been looking over this and some related articles and it appears to be methods papers comparing methodologies for construction of phylogenies using molecular techniques. I just wanted to see whether the BaTzar is just cutting and pasting spam without even a hint of understanding what he posted.

I am going to go over this when I get access to the full paper and other related work I found, but it appears to be more snatching at straws and misleading review of legitimate work.
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95510
Jul 24, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
How is evolution contradictory?
I can assure you Infinite Force you are in error.
I suppose the dude does not like his faith book to be contradicted! LOL!

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95511
Jul 24, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
How is evolution contradictory?
I can assure you Infinite Force you are in error.
No I am not in error. Re-read original post!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

216 Users are viewing the Weird Forum right now

Search the Weird Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 6 min CrunchyBacon 15,590
Still arguing with Billy R (Oct '09) 7 min Proud To Be Trina 479
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 9 min Jennifer Renee 5,696
______*ANTICHRIST on world stage______ 9 min headlines 1
Word Association (Mar '10) 12 min Jennifer Renee 15,794
Denny Crane's Garage Sale 13 min Grace Nerissa 3
The N-word: 14 min Princess Hey 49
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 15 min TALLYHO 8541 35,071
Message to Obama 18 min Bill 712
All I ever wanted in Life... (Apr '12) 27 min Art Linkletter 56
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr Mister_ E 141,609
•••
•••