So you have no original ideas of your own and the ideas you rip off and paste here aren't any good either.http://www.newgeology.us/prese ntation32.html
"Mutation - natural selection
Here is how the imaginary part is supposed to happen: On rare occasions a mutation in DNA improves a creature's ability to survive, so it is more likely to reproduce (natural selection). That is evolution's only tool for making new creatures. It might even work if it took just one gene to make and control one part. But parts of living creatures are constructed of intricate components with connections that all need to be in place for the thing to work, controlled by many genes that have to act in the proper sequence. Natural selection would not choose parts that did not have all their components existing, in place, connected, and regulated because the parts would not work. Thus all the right mutations (and none of the destructive ones) must happen at the same time by pure chance. That is physically impossible. To illustrate just how hopeless it is, imagine this: on the ground are all the materials needed to build a house (nails, boards, shingles, windows, etc.). We tie a hammer to the wagging tail of a dog and let him wander about the work site for as long as you please, even millions of years. The swinging hammer on the dog is as likely to build a house as mutation-natural selection is to make a single new working part in an animal, let alone a new creature."
Natural selection is not the only mechanism of evolution, it is the primary mechanism. Under selective pressure, a beneficial mutation that conveys an advantage is propagated. This advantage can be passed down to the descendants of the original bearer of the mutation. If the advantage has a significant impact on fitness and selective pressure is maintained the mutation becomes fixed in the population. Not random. Over time this process repeated for other genes can lead to new species with this new information in their gene pool.
To date no trait has been found to support irreducible complexity. All the examples offered have been debunked along with the concept. You are right that natural selection does not work in the way you indicate. Only those that don't understand claim it does.
I invite you to look into the research that is investigating the ice-fixing glycoprotein in notothenioid fish. The protein evolved from mutations in a digestive enzyme that have provided a selective advantage allowing these fish to live in the frigid waters of the Antarctic. Thus mutation in an existing gene leads to a new gene for a new protein with a completely different function.
If you want to abuse animals by tying things to their tales that is a crime and it is a horribly deficient analogy natural selection and more fittingly describes intelligent design and the people that support it. I would be interested in watching such an inept person like yourself tie anything to the "wagging" tail of a dog, especially a hammer. I think justice would be served forthwith in such a scenario either through frustration of failure or the sudden impression success would make. As long as the dog isn't harmed. It might even offer the bonus of your own decreased fitness.