Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#94905 Jul 3, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
I have seen Coconino-image depositions within the Tapeats, angled patterns and all, very conform and very much water deposited. Its still a sandstone - sand dunes don't homaginize well, no more than lithify into concrete hard structures without water and 'lime'.
Take the Cottonwood trail down to the creek and follow it down, you will see both. I am a novice to the canyon, but had guides that have over 25 years working there. Don't know about tunnels, sorry.
No legitimate geologist considers them to be water deposited. It must be a conspiracy.

The tunneling is fossilized evidence of marine animals. According to your belief, they had time to work around in the sediment and apparently thrive while under the pressure of a tremendous water column. This evidence doesn't fit your belief-based version, but fits the accepted geological model.
Anonymous

Lynchburg, VA

#94906 Jul 3, 2013
test

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#94907 Jul 3, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
DFS, have a day job and also working to answer other posters delayed me here so hold on;
The Silurian and Ordovician are missing in the Canyon. It jumps from trilobites to nautaloids. The nautaloid findings are interesting because most all found are of the same age. Hardly a good snapshot of how evolution should work over mil/y. They also often orient in s particular direction while they were trapped - current flow in a placid sea?
Dating of the lava flows is contradictory -
http://www.icr.org/article/282/
Good overview showing the coco formation structures -
http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/parks/grca/...
Good luck
I don't know if I need luck or a drink to believe this stuff.
If the canyon formed as the result of draining rapidly receeding flood waters, why isn't it straigher? Why is there only one canyon like this in the world?

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#94908 Jul 3, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
Uh oh SBT. You used a lying source again:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-science.h...
"Summary
The ICR's Grand Canyon Dating Project does not strike a telling blow against the reliability of isochron dating. The conditions which caused the "false isochron" in this case are fairly well-understood, and easy to avoid by proper sample selection. In fact, the resulting age in this case may well be meaningful and accurate. The problem is not the age itself but rather Austin's sleight-of-hand in trying to pass off the result as necessarily the age of the flows rather than a minimum age of their source.
The attempt to abuse the meaning of a single contrived date -- which was produced only by a sample selection geared to dating a different event, and only for samples whose results were known by Austin in advance -- says a lot more about the level of competence or honesty in this creation "science" research program, than it says about the validity of isochron dating methods.
Even if given credit for discovering this case (which he clearly doesn't deserve, as his use of Leeman's data proves), Austin has only managed to "call into question" a particular sampling technique. However, this sampling technique was known by mainstream geologists to behave in this manner long before Austin published on the topic, and this behavior is often intentionally used by geologists. Austin was aware of this, as his 1988 reference to Faure shows."
SBT's posts on here remind me of a huckster politician or a bad used car salesman. His posts have the feeling of a straffing. Like he arrives here in a hurry, blasts out his spiel and rushes off. I half expect him to ask me if I am interested in Amway. He throws in a lot of technical trimmings, but I am not seeing any meat in this sandwhich.

He blows off the fact that the Coconino sandstone is formed from sand dunes and bears the characters one would expect from such a formation. No massive flood could make the canyon in one year long event and include that formation. There is no evidence I can find that legitimately supports it being water-formed. I haven't checked his links yet.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#94909 Jul 3, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>SBT's posts on here remind me of a huckster politician or a bad used car salesman. His posts have the feeling of a straffing. Like he arrives here in a hurry, blasts out his spiel and rushes off. I half expect him to ask me if I am interested in Amway. He throws in a lot of technical trimmings, but I am not seeing any meat in this sandwhich.
He blows off the fact that the Coconino sandstone is formed from sand dunes and bears the characters one would expect from such a formation. No massive flood could make the canyon in one year long event and include that formation. There is no evidence I can find that legitimately supports it being water-formed. I haven't checked his links yet.
I did check one in this last list and quickly debunked it.

Soon my only response will be to point out that we already debunked all of his claims.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#94910 Jul 3, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>SBT's posts on here remind me of a huckster politician or a bad used car salesman. His posts have the feeling of a straffing. Like he arrives here in a hurry, blasts out his spiel and rushes off. I half expect him to ask me if I am interested in Amway. He throws in a lot of technical trimmings, but I am not seeing any meat in this sandwhich.
He blows off the fact that the Coconino sandstone is formed from sand dunes and bears the characters one would expect from such a formation. No massive flood could make the canyon in one year long event and include that formation. There is no evidence I can find that legitimately supports it being water-formed. I haven't checked his links yet.
Snake oil salesman.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#94911 Jul 3, 2013
You have to love how he includes an article from Nature in his post and then totally ignores it.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Dubai, UAE

#94913 Jul 3, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
What I mean is chemicals have no mind and then must be self-directed to create life if not directed by intelligence. Reason and logic demand that complexity doesn't come about by accident and chance. We enjoy operational science that provides all the gadgets we use to make life simpler, but somehow we then at the same time throw out reason, experience and Logic then switch when we view the natural world, even though we have no means to replicate its colossal complexity as humans. I see a jet and say man made it, in the same moment a bird flys by that in many ways schools the jet and we reason it has no maker?
Self directed, if by that you mean, they follow the laws of physics and chemistry.

Your intuition about the inability of these processes to create complexity is simply false. I cannot put it any plainer, as even in your geology experience you have seen that simple starting conditions can spontaneously lead to complex outcomes. Does it take more information to describe the Grand Canyon or a simple flat plain? Yet even though you disagree over the method, you agree that it was a combination of natural processes that created the GC. Misconstruing the second law seems to be creationists second favourite pastime after misconstruing the fossil record!

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Dubai, UAE

#94914 Jul 4, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems amazing to me that the older world, the world we see in the fossils, is so diverse when we are told evolution is an upward self-directed mindless system of onward advancement, how does that work today? Animals/plants and possibly even man were large and well formed to fit the past environment that seems to have been a thriving place - what happened to this world to stunt it?
Well, we have the entire period before the Permian extinction with animals thriving on land for 170 million years. But not mammals, birds,or dinosaurs. Giant amphibians and millipedes and the first primitive reptiles in the latter portion of the period only.

And we have the evidence of multiple mass extinctions, to explain your "stunt it" question.
Many admit there was a more tropical climate that encompassed most of the earth in the past.
ADMIT??? What folly. Scientists discovered it and actively discuss it, and it has not been controversial for decades. There is more in your expression here than meets the eye, as if conventional scientists sheepishly accepted something your lot have been insisting on, which is utter balderdash.
What few talk about (except folks like Michael Orrd and the past Dr. Maynard Miller, Americas most experienced Glaciologist), was that if you have warm oceans and then somehow the atmosphere takes a dramatic change downward in temperature, a new rain/evaporation cycle emerges, that the contact of warm oceans to a cold atmosphere (they have found mastodons frozen whole with the buttercups still hanging out of their mouths) would result in massive evaporation of the oceans.
Yes, we know. Again, your insinuation that this is somehow a dirty little secret of geologists, or swept under the carpet. Its not, and never was.
There are also so many out of sequence fossils, those that don't align with the 'geologic column'.
Not a single verified fossil of a creature that existed prior to its necessary evolutionary antecedents exists. Prove me wrong.
We know that reptiles sink when they die and mammals bloat and float....Doesn't that explain why retiles makeup the lower end of the column and mammals are further up?
What is funny about this is that mammals evolved at the same time as the dinosaurs and we have plenty of mammal fossils starting with the mammal-like reptiles 230 mya. However, they are not modern mammals but what you would expect for the earliest examples of the class.
This is not always the case also. In the Lewis range in Montana we have shell fossils above the Dinos and in Eastern Oregon pregnant Plesiosaur was found trapped above the mammal fossils swimming and struggling for her life!
Wow! So there were primitive mammals back then. Like I said. Not controversial.

The interesting pattern here is your insinuations that all of the above are points of difficulty, don't fit the conventional view, and are a bit hush hush in secular science circles. This is patently false and not only that, fails big time in that scientists LOVE to find anomalies and work through them. It is how careers are made. But it serves whoever is teaching you to paint a false picture of conventional science.

Strawmen are easy to debunk, the real science, not so much.

“A Idiot Thinks Im Savoir Faire”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Paranoid That I Am Everywhere

#94915 Jul 4, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I did check one in this last list and quickly debunked it.
Soon my only response will be to point out that we already debunked all of his claims.
Like I debunked your lies and BS the other day. How can you even show your name with the shame you must carry now after getting shown you are a liar and full of BS. You got beat at your own game and now that I am back I will gladly do it again when you are ready.

SBT
Level 2

Since: Jun 13

United States

#94916 Jul 4, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
ICR is not a valid source. It is not peer reviewed science.
Yes, there is an unconformity and the Silurian and Ordovician are missing. Why do you think this is a problem? Areas can be raised and lowered over geologic history. Some have had it happen several times.
Sorry SZ, you are waving off hundreds of mil/y of 'evolution' way too quickly. This one is a nightmare for specialists in these 2 eons. They break out in cold sweats in the night and through things at you when you bring this up in their office. Have personal experience in that! So you get to the bottom of the canyon and when you look and pound the rocks this is what you find.

1. Shell fossils
2. Undersea worms
3. Trilobites
4. Nautiloids

If these were overcome in a turbidity, this is the exact order they should be in. What you don't find is EVOLUTION. There is no sign of any transnational's, just successive types in order of their mobility. Don't blame me if the most dramatic model of geology on the planet falsifies the Geo Column. You have to read it into it to get it.

We should find hundreds of intermediates between shell and soft-shell, different successive developments of trilobites and the COMPLEX EYE, right? NONE EXIST, period. The trilobite eye is an amazing marvel, these have been found to correct for underwater aberration, a very lucky chance development, don't you think, yet found at the start of all? And the nautiloids, amazing creature, swims, millions of them are fossilized complete for hundreds of square miles in and around the Canyon in a limestone deposit. Where are all the transitions in the column there? I have seen those deposits. The truth is it takes the concept of evolution in the mind of the beholder to bridge the gaps, the evidence is missing as it should because there is no biological mechanism to bridge gaps at the cell level. Evolutionists must complete that magic mentally, hence pretty drawings and lots of words but no evidence.

It's clear that the Grand Canyon doesn't represent anything calm and placid, but is a testament of a catastrophe, contrary to what all your supposed 'peer review' experts with all their education tout. They are wrong, and if they are wrong about this, how can they be trusted with other challenges to current dogma? I can't blame them in a way, these days careers are ruined for being honest, like Nicodemus.

http://youngearth.com/grand-canyon-nautiloids

As far as your demand that every piece of field work must be peer reviewed by these same evolutionists, that's like getting by the Commies with a book on the virtues of capitalism or a critique on their leader. Doesn't make it a lie, wrong or false. Maybe you should be a little more open minded SZ.

http://youngearth.com/grand-canyon-nautiloids

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#94917 Jul 4, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry SZ, you are waving off hundreds of mil/y of 'evolution' way too quickly. This one is a nightmare for specialists in these 2 eons. They break out in cold sweats in the night and through things at you when you bring this up in their office. Have personal experience in that! So you get to the bottom of the canyon and when you look and pound the rocks this is what you find.
1. Shell fossils
2. Undersea worms
3. Trilobites
4. Nautiloids
If these were overcome in a turbidity, this is the exact order they should be in. What you don't find is EVOLUTION. There is no sign of any transnational's, just successive types in order of their mobility. Don't blame me if the most dramatic model of geology on the planet falsifies the Geo Column. You have to read it into it to get it.
We should find hundreds of intermediates between shell and soft-shell, different successive developments of trilobites and the COMPLEX EYE, right? NONE EXIST, period. The trilobite eye is an amazing marvel, these have been found to correct for underwater aberration, a very lucky chance development, don't you think, yet found at the start of all? And the nautiloids, amazing creature, swims, millions of them are fossilized complete for hundreds of square miles in and around the Canyon in a limestone deposit. Where are all the transitions in the column there? I have seen those deposits. The truth is it takes the concept of evolution in the mind of the beholder to bridge the gaps, the evidence is missing as it should because there is no biological mechanism to bridge gaps at the cell level. Evolutionists must complete that magic mentally, hence pretty drawings and lots of words but no evidence.
It's clear that the Grand Canyon doesn't represent anything calm and placid, but is a testament of a catastrophe, contrary to what all your supposed 'peer review' experts with all their education tout. They are wrong, and if they are wrong about this, how can they be trusted with other challenges to current dogma? I can't blame them in a way, these days careers are ruined for being honest, like Nicodemus.
http://youngearth.com/grand-canyon-nautiloids
As far as your demand that every piece of field work must be peer reviewed by these same evolutionists, that's like getting by the Commies with a book on the virtues of capitalism or a critique on their leader. Doesn't make it a lie, wrong or false. Maybe you should be a little more open minded SZ.
http://youngearth.com/grand-canyon-nautiloids
Do you want to answer the question of where all the bodies of those evil menz went, according to you flud prophecy the ground is full of evil men destroyed by the wrath of gawd.

"The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. 6 The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. 7 So the Lord said,“I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.”

The rock strata should be full of them , perhaps there was one clinging to the dino you said was swimming for it's life.
Surely the whole strata is filled with them mixed in with all the other creatures. Inquiring minds want to know , how many did you find?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#94918 Jul 4, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I debunked your lies and BS the other day. How can you even show your name with the shame you must carry now after getting shown you are a liar and full of BS. You got beat at your own game and now that I am back I will gladly do it again when you are ready.
What shame?

Oh, what, are you talking about the all of the points and facts you ran away from with lame excuses?

No, your idiocy does not shame me at all.

I only think it shames you and your many socks. That would make you the most shamed person on Topix.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#94919 Jul 4, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry SZ, you are waving off hundreds of mil/y of 'evolution' way too quickly. This one is a nightmare for specialists in these 2 eons. They break out in cold sweats in the night and through things at you when you bring this up in their office. Have personal experience in that! So you get to the bottom of the canyon and when you look and pound the rocks this is what you find.
1. Shell fossils
2. Undersea worms
3. Trilobites
4. Nautiloids
If these were overcome in a turbidity, this is the exact order they should be in. What you don't find is EVOLUTION. There is no sign of any transnational's, just successive types in order of their mobility. Don't blame me if the most dramatic model of geology on the planet falsifies the Geo Column. You have to read it into it to get it.
We should find hundreds of intermediates between shell and soft-shell, different successive developments of trilobites and the COMPLEX EYE, right? NONE EXIST, period. The trilobite eye is an amazing marvel, these have been found to correct for underwater aberration, a very lucky chance development, don't you think, yet found at the start of all? And the nautiloids, amazing creature, swims, millions of them are fossilized complete for hundreds of square miles in and around the Canyon in a limestone deposit. Where are all the transitions in the column there? I have seen those deposits. The truth is it takes the concept of evolution in the mind of the beholder to bridge the gaps, the evidence is missing as it should because there is no biological mechanism to bridge gaps at the cell level. Evolutionists must complete that magic mentally, hence pretty drawings and lots of words but no evidence.
It's clear that the Grand Canyon doesn't represent anything calm and placid, but is a testament of a catastrophe, contrary to what all your supposed 'peer review' experts with all their education tout. They are wrong, and if they are wrong about this, how can they be trusted with other challenges to current dogma? I can't blame them in a way, these days careers are ruined for being honest, like Nicodemus.
http://youngearth.com/grand-canyon-nautiloids
As far as your demand that every piece of field work must be peer reviewed by these same evolutionists, that's like getting by the Commies with a book on the virtues of capitalism or a critique on their leader. Doesn't make it a lie, wrong or false. Maybe you should be a little more open minded SZ.
http://youngearth.com/grand-canyon-nautiloids
No. Worldwide creationists have no explanation of the fossil record.

They have to depend upon miraculous "blooms" where the conditions would lead to exactly the opposite of that.

They cannot explain the sorting of fossils, especially when it comes to micro flora and fauna. In fact they seem to think all sorts of weird things. That ichthyosaurs could not out swim manatees. That humans are faster than the fastest of dinosaurs. That oak trees are faster than pine trees, now that one makes no sense at all.

There are all sorts of land forms that you cannot explain without your opponents breaking down with laughter. A flood could never make incised meanders for example.

The problem with creationism is that it constantly contradicts itself. We don't even need evolution to tell us that it is wrong. It says that all by itself.

Now you loaded up your post with nonsense and lies again.

Why don't you bring up the points you don't understand one at a time?

For example, eye evolution has been explained many times over. You made one idiotic mistake by claiming that evolution is random. It isn't. Parts of it are random, that does not mean evolution itself is random..

SBT
Level 2

Since: Jun 13

United States

#94920 Jul 4, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you want to answer the question of where all the bodies of those evil menz went, according to you flud prophecy the ground is full of evil men destroyed by the wrath of gawd.
"The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. 6 The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. 7 So the Lord said,“I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.”
The rock strata should be full of them , perhaps there was one clinging to the dino you said was swimming for it's life.

Surely the whole strata is filled with them mixed in with all the other creatures. Inquiring minds want to know , how many did you find?
All good questions, go out to nat'l dino park in UT and that's what you will find. Think about it, if Noah preached it for over 100 years and then it started clouding up, there were earthquakes and it starts raining, what would you do? There have been many finds of human remains in the back of cave structures sealed in. People knew about this coming, I bet the boats filled up and others headed for the hills. Pandamodium, what a mess it would have been! So they were drowned and decomposed while floating and their bodies fell apart. But Scripture teaches that every one that perished had a second chance - Christ preached to them after the cross, bet it was a full house!! This does show us the fairness and mercy of God. All the arguments of Dawkins fail apart right there.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#94921 Jul 4, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
All good questions, go out to nat'l dino park in UT and that's what you will find. Think about it, if Noah preached it for over 100 years and then it started clouding up, there were earthquakes and it starts raining, what would you do? There have been many finds of human remains in the back of cave structures sealed in. People knew about this coming, I bet the boats filled up and others headed for the hills. Pandamodium, what a mess it would have been! So they were drowned and decomposed while floating and their bodies fell apart. But Scripture teaches that every one that perished had a second chance - Christ preached to them after the cross, bet it was a full house!! This does show us the fairness and mercy of God. All the arguments of Dawkins fail apart right there.
Nope, you want to have it both ways again. In other words you are contradicting your earlier claims.

Caves are in sedimentary rock. In one place you want to claim that the caves are after the flood and in others you want to claim it was before.

We know how and when the sedimentary rocks were formed. You clearly do not.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#94922 Jul 4, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
All good questions, go out to nat'l dino park in UT and that's what you will find. Think about it, if Noah preached it for over 100 years and then it started clouding up, there were earthquakes and it starts raining, what would you do? There have been many finds of human remains in the back of cave structures sealed in. People knew about this coming, I bet the boats filled up and others headed for the hills. Pandamodium, what a mess it would have been! So they were drowned and decomposed while floating and their bodies fell apart. But Scripture teaches that every one that perished had a second chance - Christ preached to them after the cross, bet it was a full house!! This does show us the fairness and mercy of God. All the arguments of Dawkins fail apart right there.
I'm sorry you can't possibly think humans and dinosaurs existed at the same time.
But if they had and all died in a flood, the bones would be mixed together, there is no excuse you can make that would stop that.
If you really believe the nonsense you are saying, you are both ignorant and brainwashed beyond repair. There are too many physical impossibilities to even consider the idea. Sorry not even intelligent Christians think this utter nonsense.

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#94923 Jul 4, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
All good questions, go out to nat'l dino park in UT and that's what you will find. Think about it, if Noah preached it for over 100 years and then it started clouding up, there were earthquakes and it starts raining, what would you do? There have been many finds of human remains in the back of cave structures sealed in. People knew about this coming, I bet the boats filled up and others headed for the hills. Pandamodium, what a mess it would have been! So they were drowned and decomposed while floating and their bodies fell apart. But Scripture teaches that every one that perished had a second chance - Christ preached to them after the cross, bet it was a full house!! This does show us the fairness and mercy of God. All the arguments of Dawkins fail apart right there.
In other words, just make up some crap. If people were listening to Noah, then I guess wickedness wasn't so pervasive. But if wickedness wasn't as pervasive, then why would God send a flood. But God sent a flood so wickedness must have been all pervasive as stated. But if Noah was listened too, then...

What a load of garbage.

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#94924 Jul 4, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> I'm sorry you can't possibly think humans and dinosaurs existed at the same time.
But if they had and all died in a flood, the bones would be mixed together, there is no excuse you can make that would stop that.
If you really believe the nonsense you are saying, you are both ignorant and brainwashed beyond repair. There are too many physical impossibilities to even consider the idea. Sorry not even intelligent Christians think this utter nonsense.
Oh, there will be an excuse. Made up, but it will come, I feel pretty certain of that.

“A have offended, Brickie, Dark”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

Blue, Suncore, Replay whoever

#94925 Jul 4, 2013
SBT wrote:
<quoted text>
All good questions, go out to nat'l dino park in UT and that's what you will find. Think about it, if Noah preached it for over 100 years and then it started clouding up, there were earthquakes and it starts raining, what would you do? There have been many finds of human remains in the back of cave structures sealed in. People knew about this coming, I bet the boats filled up and others headed for the hills. Pandamodium, what a mess it would have been! So they were drowned and decomposed while floating and their bodies fell apart. But Scripture teaches that every one that perished had a second chance - Christ preached to them after the cross, bet it was a full house!! This does show us the fairness and mercy of God. All the arguments of Dawkins fail apart right there.
And yet, no masses of human remains have been found.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
WHAT???? A NEW word game? FOUR WORDS (Sep '08) 5 min Parden Pard 40,272
***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Jan '10) 6 min Dally Mama 77,407
Do It Obama! 7 min Hoosier Hillbilly 5
Woman Adds 3rd Breast to Make Herself 'Unattrac... 8 min Instigator 11
JUST SAY SOMETHING. Whatever comes to mind!! (Aug '09) 8 min AppHappy 28,617
Add a Word, Ruin a Movie (Oct '13) 10 min Parden Pard 3,333
What Could Be Catchy,...? 13 min AppHappy 4
Reporter Quits in Vulgar Fashion 13 min Instigator 6
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 35 min reebie 20,617
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 42 min TALLYHO 8541 36,523
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr Wolftracks 147,048
•••

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••