Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 174068 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Dinoeater

Clifton, NJ

#93695 Jun 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>in fact, she has countered all of your silly ideas with facts. it seems you are the one denying the facts in front of your face.
this is very typical of cult members, even when shown absolute, positive, undeniable proof that their cult lied to them, they still cling to the cult mantra. look into cult deprogramming and you will see this is true.
yeah we don't do mantras.
and If you all really want evidence then here I'll throw it on the desk:
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/AD-Publications
here go through all of it. though it'll take sometime. since it touches all kinds of topics not just science but its broken up to categories.
Dinoeater

Clifton, NJ

#93696 Jun 22, 2013
there last post has all the info you people need. if you still don't believe after that you are just denying truth.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93697 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah we don't do mantras.
and If you all really want evidence then here I'll throw it on the desk:
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/AD-Publications
here go through all of it. though it'll take sometime. since it touches all kinds of topics not just science but its broken up to categories.
ummm...dude, you have been spewing your cult's mantra all over these pages...
Dinoeater

Clifton, NJ

#93698 Jun 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>ummm...dude, you have been spewing your cult's mantra all over these pages...
when did mantras become beliefs? and the only reason I repeated my self is because you guys kept saying the same thing in different forms. just look at the link It has most of the answers.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93699 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah we don't do mantras.
and If you all really want evidence then here I'll throw it on the desk:
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/AD-Publications
here go through all of it. though it'll take sometime. since it touches all kinds of topics not just science but its broken up to categories.
that site is funny. they mean it as parody, right? kind of like The Onion...

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#93700 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
<quoted text>
waiting for evidence for what? if you don't even look at the links? you don't care whether its evidence or not you just say rubbish!
I did look at your link, and all it had was a bunch of assertions in a blog, nothing more. I asked for evidence.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#93701 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah we don't do mantras.
and If you all really want evidence then here I'll throw it on the desk:
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/AD-Publications
here go through all of it. though it'll take sometime. since it touches all kinds of topics not just science but its broken up to categories.
First line in their "story:"

"We are committed to sharing the truth about God and His promises. Amazing Discoveries™ began as a way for us to further spread this truth."

It's not a scientific source, nor is anything in that site based on science.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93702 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
there last post has all the info you people need. if you still don't believe after that you are just denying truth.
which post where? what are we supposed to believe?

informative sentences are fun!
Dinoeater

Clifton, NJ

#93703 Jun 22, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
First line in their "story:"
"We are committed to sharing the truth about God and His promises. Amazing Discoveries™ began as a way for us to further spread this truth."
It's not a scientific source, nor is anything in that site based on science.
it has a section based on science it's the first section you cant miss it.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93704 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
<quoted text>
it has a section based on science it's the first section you cant miss it.
labeling a section science does not make it factual.

one has to actually understand science if you are able to perceive if that site is accurate or not. i can see why you are confused about this issue...
Dinoeater

Clifton, NJ

#93705 Jun 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>which post where? what are we supposed to believe?
informative sentences are fun!
1)the post before that one.
2) whether the bible is right or not.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93706 Jun 22, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
First line in their "story:"
"We are committed to sharing the truth about God and His promises. Amazing Discoveries™ began as a way for us to further spread this truth."
It's not a scientific source, nor is anything in that site based on science.
my fave was " if you don't believe the bible is true, any discussion of its veracity is moot."

it would take a complete moron to read this crap and believe it.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93707 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
<quoted text>
1)the post before that one.
2) whether the bible is right or not.
we know the bible is not correct. this has been proven time and time again. it is the word of humans. it is incorrect in many, many provable, verifiable ways. no god wrote it, no god divinely inspired its writing.
Dinoeater

Clifton, NJ

#93708 Jun 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>labeling a section science does not make it factual.
one has to actually understand science if you are able to perceive if that site is accurate or not. i can see why you are confused about this issue...
great since you know all about science you should be able to understand it perfectly.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93709 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
<quoted text>
great since you know all about science you should be able to understand it perfectly.
i know enough to know crap when i see it. i didn't read the science section, but if this is where you get the crap you post here about science, that is all i need to know.

is this where you learned that thistles are inedible and thorny plants can't be eaten? science like that?
Dinoeater

Clifton, NJ

#93710 Jun 22, 2013
you guys aren't taking this seriously at all oh well I'll be back next Friday maybe. Have a nice week bye.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93711 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
you guys aren't taking this seriously at all oh well I'll be back next Friday maybe. Have a nice week bye.
nothing you posted was serious.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#93712 Jun 22, 2013
Dinoeater wrote:
you guys aren't taking this seriously at all oh well I'll be back next Friday maybe. Have a nice week bye.
The Bible has many failures in it besides the Adam and Eve and Noah's myths. In both the Old and New Testaments the Earth is described as being flat. Apologists will try to claim otherwise, but it is clear that they are wrong. It describes the Earth as flat and fixed in place by both word and action. Supposedly if something is repeated several times in the Bible that somehow makes that claim more important and more "true".

The Bible has many contradictions in it, even in describing how many people, who, and when were involved at the tomb after Jesus's crucifixion.

To claim the Bible has no errors in it is to give yourself an impossible standard to meet.
drink The hive

New York, NY

#93713 Jun 22, 2013
susanblange

Norfolk, VA

#93714 Jun 22, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible has many failures in it besides the Adam and Eve and Noah's myths. In both the Old and New Testaments the Earth is described as being flat. Apologists will try to claim otherwise, but it is clear that they are wrong. It describes the Earth as flat and fixed in place by both word and action. Supposedly if something is repeated several times in the Bible that somehow makes that claim more important and more "true".
The Bible has many contradictions in it, even in describing how many people, who, and when were involved at the tomb after Jesus's crucifixion.
To claim the Bible has no errors in it is to give yourself an impossible standard to meet.
God said the earth was round. Isaiah 40:22 "It is he that sits upon the circle of the earth"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 3 min wichita-rick 169,695
Add a Word, Drop a Panty game 10 min andet1987 771
WHAT???? A NEW word game? FOUR WORDS (Sep '08) 25 min andet1987 42,128
What's the time where you live? (May '13) 27 min KNIGHT DeVINE 896
Funny!! Word association game. (Nov '13) 29 min wichita-rick 3,250
JUST SAY SOMETHING. Whatever comes to mind!! (Aug '09) 33 min KNIGHT DeVINE 29,783
Poll Would you live in a boarding house? 37 min wichita-rick 10
2015: "Make a Story/ 6 Words Only: 1 hr Brother Larry 2,602
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 1 hr Sam 44,082
name my cat 1 hr Crazy Jae 68
More from around the web