Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216866 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#93251 Jun 18, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>This from someone that doesn't even understand time is a physical property, ignorant.
Can you please wipe that brown sh:t off you nose?

What a DOLT!
I never asked what time is DOLT!
I asked where did it come from.

Answer? Didn't think so.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#93252 Jun 18, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>This from someone that doesn't even understand time is a physical property, ignorant.
"The worthiness of Einstein's conclusions hinge on one question: Is time physical? The answer is no. Time is immaterial.2 I know this because all physical things have physical properties: chemical composition, weight, height, etc. How much does time weigh? What is its chemical composition? Such questions are absurd when applied to time. Time does not weigh anything and is not composed of chemicals because time is not a physical substance possessing physical properties that can be measured and dissected. To think of time as a physical substance is to commit the categorical fallacy; i.e. confusing one category of existence/thought with another. It is like trying to look at man's soul through a microscope! It simply cannot be done. Time is not physical."

“e pluribus unum”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

primus inter pares

#93253 Jun 18, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, FAIL!!!
I have never failed. And without fail I am.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#93254 Jun 18, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
Show me then, coward.
This from someone that doesn't even understand time is a physical property, very ignorant.
Nope, I already asked you how your stupid question applies. You ran away.

After you have answered my question I will answer yours.

“e pluribus unum”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

primus inter pares

#93255 Jun 18, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
Another idiot and a coward.
The answer is, time is a physical property. Now you know!
Time is an abstract measure of motion. Without fail I am.

http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/index.cfm
EXPERT

Redding, CA

#93256 Jun 18, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you please wipe that brown sh:t off you nose?
What a DOLT!
I never asked what time is DOLT!
I asked where did it come from.
Answer? Didn't think so.
A reply worthy from a sexually confused 15yo.

You just don't get it do you?

Time is a physical property! So do you know what this would imply?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#93257 Jun 18, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
"The worthiness of Einstein's conclusions hinge on one question: Is time physical? The answer is no. Time is immaterial.2 I know this because all physical things have physical properties: chemical composition, weight, height, etc. How much does time weigh? What is its chemical composition? Such questions are absurd when applied to time. Time does not weigh anything and is not composed of chemicals because time is not a physical substance possessing physical properties that can be measured and dissected. To think of time as a physical substance is to commit the categorical fallacy; i.e. confusing one category of existence/thought with another. It is like trying to look at man's soul through a microscope! It simply cannot be done. Time is not physical."
yet time is not separate from space, and space,(space-time, actually), does have physical properties...

yes, SZ was correct that you do not even understand how science works...

“e pluribus unum”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

primus inter pares

#93258 Jun 18, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
" I have science on my side"
Can I see the testability of where Time came from?
Science --- LMAO
Asking a child's question that isn't a childish question,
doesn't make you seem any brighter, or answer the question.

Time in definition came from our linear measurement of progression in the 4th dimension. No that isn't where it came from physically.
Time came from the singularity that manifests itself into all being. starting 13.7 billion years ago , and still counting.
EXPERT

Redding, CA

#93259 Jun 18, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, I already asked you how your stupid question applies. You ran away.
After you have answered my question I will answer yours.
Sorry, still here,

Now,

Allow my to bitchslap you again... I never asked you a question, lunch meat.

I made a claim. You are to retarded to refute it.

So, get back on the porch with the puppies.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#93260 Jun 18, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? No sh:t Sherlock. Boy your so bright I bet your mommy called you sun.
Lets sum this up. You call my belief in a creator a myth. Yet You believe in the Big Bang. Where there was NOTHING then there was everything. No amount of science can ever get you from NOTHING to today. Impossible!
I see now why you're an atheist, it's because you believe in NOTHING.
Once again, we have evidence for this. You don't.

We can even show mass coming from nothing today.

It is not my fault if you are ignorant about science.

Here is a video for you to watch:

EXPERT

Redding, CA

#93261 Jun 18, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
"The worthiness of Einstein's conclusions hinge on one question: Is time physical? The answer is no. Time is immaterial.2 I know this because all physical things have physical properties: chemical composition, weight, height, etc. How much does time weigh? What is its chemical composition? Such questions are absurd when applied to time. Time does not weigh anything and is not composed of chemicals because time is not a physical substance possessing physical properties that can be measured and dissected. To think of time as a physical substance is to commit the categorical fallacy; i.e. confusing one category of existence/thought with another. It is like trying to look at man's soul through a microscope! It simply cannot be done. Time is not physical."
You should slow down and keep track of who is making what argument...just an fyi.

If time was not a physical property then acceleration and mass would have no effect on time, but we know it does.
EXPERT

Redding, CA

#93262 Jun 18, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Asking a child's question that isn't a childish question,
doesn't make you seem any brighter, or answer the question.
Time in definition came from our linear measurement of progression in the 4th dimension. No that isn't where it came from physically.
Time came from the singularity that manifests itself into all being. starting 13.7 billion years ago , and still counting.
I can see progression in your understanding of time from your first reply. I can see that you will actually take the time to research data to strengthen your position. There is hope for you yet.

“e pluribus unum”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

primus inter pares

#93263 Jun 18, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text> I can see progression in your understanding of time from your first reply. I can see that you will actually take the time to research data to strengthen your position. There is hope for you yet.
Ive been down every road you can think of already, and Time is my specialty.
You see unlike you ,I don't come here to argue with you.
I need not research time, anymore, not this time or next time.
In fact you should feel special that you got any of "my time".

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#93264 Jun 18, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
How? Sweden has a lower crime rate, more equality, and a better living standard than the US, and is one of the least religious countries. So ... how is what I stated wrong?
I guess that blows your BS out of the water when not long ago you said the same thing about the USA. LMFAO

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#93265 Jun 18, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
It's part of the universe. When we know how it all started we'll know that as well.
YOU DON'T KNOW how it all started. You just think you do. That is a fact!

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#93266 Jun 18, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
Typos upon typos.
At any rate it is a stupid question. It in no way proves your point. "We don't know yet" does not translate to "God did it."
Get your head out of your assss so you can see the keyboard. LMAO

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#93267 Jun 18, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
Another idiot and a coward.
The answer is, time is a physical property. Now you know!
You called that exactly right. LOL

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#93268 Jun 18, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess that blows your BS out of the water when not long ago you said the same thing about the USA. LMFAO
Gah, do you not know the difference between comparative and trends? Of course not.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#93269 Jun 18, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. I have no myth. I have science on my side. It is based on evidence, not nonsense written by a bunch of bronze age sheep herders.
We answer what we can and say "I don't know" for what we don't know. We don't make things up. That is what your side does.
You cannot touch the science of the theory of evolution. Odds are that you don't even know hos science works.
How many times do you have to be told. Science has been around a heck of a lot longer than the ToE. Science does not need ToE. ToE needs science! Science can survive without ToE but ToE cannot survive without science.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#93270 Jun 18, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU DON'T KNOW how it all started. You just think you do. That is a fact!
How does "we don't know yet" equate to "we know now?"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
*add A word / drop a word* (Nov '12) 3 min Poppyann 15,258
What turns you on ? (Aug '11) 5 min Poppyann 1,508
Keep a Word.....Drop a Word Game (Sep '13) 6 min Poppyann 12,799
News Signs of success include being happy... and hav... 7 min Parden Pard 13
Play "end of the name"... (Jun '15) 7 min Princess Hey 2,290
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 8 min F_R_E_D 207,121
keep a word drop a word (Sep '12) 9 min Princess Hey 15,302
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 24 min Busted 67,242
What Topics knows about you 52 min Lucy the First 76
What Turns You Off (Jun '11) 1 hr Bad Bex 10,634
More from around the web