He didn't say it was. Nature created everything that is not artificial.Why in your mind is nature limited to creating live things?
Way ahead of ya. Notice how you are using the old bait-and-switch method, referring to biological organisms, physical/chemical reactions and non-replicating artificial objects.Is fire self reproductive?
Is lighting reproductive?
Is diamonds reproductive?
You can see where this is going I hope.
Of course complexity can be measured by science. Creationists can't. That's the difference.Science can't measure complexity?
Wow it use to be able to. What happened? Is a bike to complex for something that created man?
Creationists think the issue is about "complexity", assuming nature can only make simple things and designers can only make complex things. If that is the case then creationists need to explain exactly how "complexity" is measured, what the demarcation line is between "designed" and "non-designed", and how that demarcation line was determined in an objective manner via the scientific method. Once THAT is done they need to propose the mechanisms used for which particular "designs" and evidence of them. Of course to go with all that you would need scientific evidence that this "designer" of yours exists in the first place.