Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 173310 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#88784 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Truth with a capital T sounds good to me.
Holy CRAP you're a dim bulb, aint you?

YES. It is WIDELY acknowledged that there are systems, and cycles, and patterns that occur all the time within nature.

Since the dawn of man, THOUSANDS of years ago, humans have known this.
Mankind has been using the lessons learned from nature to construct society.

For example:
Natural Selection in plants and animals was recognized by early man, and man has been **selectively** breeding animals for preferred traits in domesticated stock, pets as well as ornimental plants and food crops since.

Ancient man witnessed the rising and setting of the Sun, Moon, and other heavenly bodies, and have developed systems that predict, and incorporate these patterns such as clocks, calendars, as well as sending spacecraft to distant bodies in the solar system, and studying other systems billions of miles away.

Recently, a 13-year old kid theorized he could design a more efficient arrangement of solar cells by copying the pattern and arrangement of leaves on a tree. This is known as the Fionacci sequence. He proved his design was 20%-50% more efficient than a uniform array of the same number of solar cells.
http://inhabitat.com/13-year-old-makes-solar-...

NOBODY needs to be taught anything more regarding your childish "SCP Theory".

We've been using it for EONS.

If you think you can make a Unified Theory of SCP that will explain the mechanism of how all these diverse natural functions were 'designed', and who 'designed' them, GO FOR IT.

But please DROP the notion that you're an original thinker.

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#88785 May 8, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You forge the capital T
Have you never noticed that liars for their god always use a capital T when claiming Truth
That's to distinguish it from something actually being true
FREE SERVANT

Bellevue, WA

#88786 May 8, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Holy CRAP you're a dim bulb, aint you?
YES. It is WIDELY acknowledged that there are systems, and cycles, and patterns that occur all the time within nature.
Since the dawn of man, THOUSANDS of years ago, humans have known this.
Mankind has been using the lessons learned from nature to construct society.
For example:
Natural Selection in plants and animals was recognized by early man, and man has been **selectively** breeding animals for preferred traits in domesticated stock, pets as well as ornimental plants and food crops since.
Ancient man witnessed the rising and setting of the Sun, Moon, and other heavenly bodies, and have developed systems that predict, and incorporate these patterns such as clocks, calendars, as well as sending spacecraft to distant bodies in the solar system, and studying other systems billions of miles away.
Recently, a 13-year old kid theorized he could design a more efficient arrangement of solar cells by copying the pattern and arrangement of leaves on a tree. This is known as the Fionacci sequence. He proved his design was 20%-50% more efficient than a uniform array of the same number of solar cells.
http://inhabitat.com/13-year-old-makes-solar-...
NOBODY needs to be taught anything more regarding your childish "SCP Theory".
We've been using it for EONS.
If you think you can make a Unified Theory of SCP that will explain the mechanism of how all these diverse natural functions were 'designed', and who 'designed' them, GO FOR IT.
But please DROP the notion that you're an original thinker.
YES, But some people seem to overlook these facts and put the wrong intrpretation to them.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#88787 May 8, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
yourbackfkinghurts for a reason.
Personally, I would say myfkingbackhurts, but that's just me.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#88788 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>YES, But some people seem to overlook these facts and put the wrong intrpretation to them.
So, it's YOUR INTERPRETATION of all the countless and diverse systems, and cycles, and patterns (that humanity has already been aware of, and using btw), that YOU'RE going to educate us on?

I am turgid with anticipation.

[\SARCASM]

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#88789 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>YES, But some people seem to overlook these facts and put the wrong intrpretation to them.
Yes, in fact you exclusively.
FREE SERVANT

Bellevue, WA

#88790 May 8, 2013
If I am teaching the wrong interpretation of SCP theory, then everyone here is invited to give a better one.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#88791 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
If I am teaching the wrong interpretation of SCP theory, then everyone here is invited to give a better one.
Let's break down your post above, shall we?
FREE SERVANT wrote:
If I am teaching ...
1. You have yet to present ANYTHING of value. You have taught NOTHING.
2. Who appointed you an expert at anything connected with either systems, or cycles, or patterns found in nature. You DO realize that the vast majority of these systems and cycles and patterns are not related to each other, right? If it is your contention that these ARE somehow connected, you've done a shitty job of presenting evidence for it.
FREE SERVANT wrote:
... the wrong interpretation ...
1. YOUR "interpretation". No data to back up your baseless assertions. Science is DATA. EVIDENCE. You have none. All you have is "interpretation", or opinion. Which is worthless.
FREE SERVANT wrote:
... of SCP theory...
1. There **IS** no SCP "theory". I'm sure this has been brought to your attention previously.
FREE SERVANT wrote:
...then everyone here is invited to give a better one.
Why? Nobody cares.
FREE SERVANT

Bellevue, WA

#88792 May 8, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's break down your post above, shall we?
<quoted text>
1. You have yet to present ANYTHING of value. You have taught NOTHING.
2. Who appointed you an expert at anything connected with either systems, or cycles, or patterns found in nature. You DO realize that the vast majority of these systems and cycles and patterns are not related to each other, right? If it is your contention that these ARE somehow connected, you've done a shitty job of presenting evidence for it.
<quoted text>
1. YOUR "interpretation". No data to back up your baseless assertions. Science is DATA. EVIDENCE. You have none. All you have is "interpretation", or opinion. Which is worthless.
<quoted text>
1. There **IS** no SCP "theory". I'm sure this has been brought to your attention previously.
<quoted text>
Why? Nobody cares.
Everyboody should care how the true facts can be applied to problem-solving in times to come. We will need all the knowledge we can get for a firm foundation.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#88793 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Everyboody should care how the true facts can be applied to problem-solving in times to come. We will need all the knowledge we can get for a firm foundation.
RPG?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#88794 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Everyboody should care how the true facts can be applied to problem-solving in times to come. We will need all the knowledge we can get for a firm foundation.
Again: You have presented NO FACTS.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#88795 May 8, 2013
mybackfkinghurts wrote:
Atheistic Scientists were Humiliated As Their Junk DNA Evolution Paradigm recently Collapsed
Anti-theistic scientists, Ken Miller,
O hai again there, fake Prof X. You may have noticed but your BS spam was debunked WAAAAAAAAAAY back on page 1. Perhaps you didn't notice that the first time round?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#88796 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
If I am teaching the wrong interpretation of SCP theory, then everyone here is invited to give a better one.
Still not caring Mikey.
FREE SERVANT

Bellevue, WA

#88797 May 8, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Again: You have presented NO FACTS.
Would you agree with me that all natural systems will have a series of events that are regularly repeated in the same order?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#88798 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Would you agree with me that all natural systems will have a series of events that are regularly repeated in the same order?
It's getting late (here at work), and I am growing weary at your feeble attempts to appear intelligent and having an original thought.

Here's Wiki's definition of "System".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System

Open the link, begin reading and start masterbating.

Level 2

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#88799 May 8, 2013
nti-theistic scientists, Ken Miller, Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents made failed observations about DNA, such that their Darwinian evolution paradigm has collapsed. Not that long ago, junk DNA was being defended as an important element of the Darwinian evolution paradigm ... The question now seems to be whether Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents will continue to defend junk DNA, whatever they call it?- Rob Crowther,PhD

Evolutionary Biologist Richard Sternberg discusses modern genomics and the collapse of evolutionists junk DNA theory.

Level 2

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#88800 May 8, 2013
Humiliated As Their Junk DNA Evolution Paradigm recently Collapsed
Anti-theistic scientists, Ken Miller, Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents made failed observations about DNA, such that their Darwinian evolution paradigm has collapsed. Not that long ago, junk DNA was being defended as an important element of the Darwinian evolution paradigm ... The question now seems to be whether Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents will continue to defend junk DNA, whatever they call it?- Rob Crowther,PhD
Evolutionary Biologist Richard Sternberg discusses modern genomics and the collapse of evolutionists junk DNA theory.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#88801 May 8, 2013
mybackfkinghurts wrote:
Anti-theistic scientists, Ken Miller
Ken Miller is a Christian. Your very first sentence is a lie, and everything that follows is either all wrong, or lies and still all wrong. Repeatedly spamming it won't magically make it all true.
Patriot

Nashville, TN

#88802 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Truth with a capital T sounds good to me.
HIS word is Truth and we are sanctified by it. John 17:17

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#88803 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>I am an inventor and not a scientist.
You are not a scientist because you have no peer reviewed scientific papers published. So why do you not have any peer reviewed scientific papers published?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 3 min LOST IN MISSISSIPPI 43,332
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 4 min Crazy Jae 169,148
How's your weather today? (Mar '12) 8 min Crazy Jae 5,519
The Letter B (Jun '09) 11 min andet1987 5,350
OFFBEAT.keepAword.DropAword.2011edition (Oct '11) 27 min Old Sam 19,506
keep a word drop a word (Sep '12) 27 min Old Sam 9,450
Change 1 letter game! (Nov '11) 28 min Old Sam 5,103
Last Word is First Word (no "breast" word please) 53 min andet1987 591
More from around the web