Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216926 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

FREE SERVANT
#88774 May 8, 2013
I will teach the truth as best I can.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#88775 May 8, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
This must be why you vomit when you have downed too much beer and ended the night with a dodgy kabab - yes?
That's only a cycle if you keep doing it!

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#88776 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
I will teach the truth as best I can.
You forge the capital T

Have you never noticed that liars for their god always use a capital T when claiming Truth
FREE SERVANT
#88777 May 8, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You forge the capital T
Have you never noticed that liars for their god always use a capital T when claiming Truth
Truth with a capital T sounds good to me.

Level 2

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#88778 May 8, 2013
Atheistic Scientists were Humiliated As Their Junk DNA Evolution Paradigm recently Collapsed
Anti-theistic scientists, Ken Miller, Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents made failed observations about DNA, such that their Darwinian evolution paradigm has collapsed. Not that long ago, junk DNA was being defended as an important element of the Darwinian evolution paradigm ... The question now seems to be whether Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents will continue to defend junk DNA, whatever they call it?- Rob Crowther,PhD
Evolutionary Biologist Richard Sternberg discusses modern genomics an
FREE SERVANT
#88779 May 8, 2013
I kinda like the "RIGHT AS RAIN" adage as well.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#88780 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Truth with a capital T sounds good to me.
Reminds me of a prayer I learned as a child.....lord help me seek the truth but spare me the company of those who think they've already found it.

Level 2

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#88781 May 8, 2013
Atheistic Scientists were Humiliated As Their Junk DNA Evolution Paradigm recently Collapsed
Anti-theistic scientists, Ken Miller, Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents made failed observations about DNA, such that their Darwinian evolution paradigm has collapsed. Not that long ago, junk DNA was being defended as an important element of the Darwinian evolution paradigm ... The question now seems to be whether Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents will continue to defend junk DNA, whatever they call it?- Rob Crowther,PhD
Evolutionary Biologist Richard Sternberg discusses modern genomics and the collapse of evolutionists junk DNA theory.
http://www.cross.tv/66770

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#88782 May 8, 2013
mybackfkinghurts wrote:
Atheistic Scientists were Humiliated As Their Junk DNA Evolution Paradigm recently Collapsed
Anti-theistic scientists, Ken Miller, Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents made failed observations about DNA, such that their Darwinian evolution paradigm has collapsed. Not that long ago, junk DNA was being defended as an important element of the Darwinian evolution paradigm ... The question now seems to be whether Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents will continue to defend junk DNA, whatever they call it?- Rob Crowther,PhD
Evolutionary Biologist Richard Sternberg discusses modern genomics an
Wrong. Junk DNA and evolution are both alive and well.

And to make it worse the first scientist you mentioned is a Christian.

Hmm, what returning creatard is this with a new name?

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#88783 May 8, 2013
mybackfkinghurts wrote:
Atheistic Scientists were Humiliated As Their Junk DNA Evolution Paradigm recently Collapsed
Anti-theistic scientists, Ken Miller, Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents made failed observations about DNA, such that their Darwinian evolution paradigm has collapsed. Not that long ago, junk DNA was being defended as an important element of the Darwinian evolution paradigm ... The question now seems to be whether Ayala, Dawkins, Collins, Falk and other junk DNA proponents will continue to defend junk DNA, whatever they call it?- Rob Crowther,PhD
Evolutionary Biologist Richard Sternberg discusses modern genomics and the collapse of evolutionists junk DNA theory.
http://www.cross.tv/66770
yourbackfkinghurts for a reason.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#88784 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Truth with a capital T sounds good to me.
Holy CRAP you're a dim bulb, aint you?

YES. It is WIDELY acknowledged that there are systems, and cycles, and patterns that occur all the time within nature.

Since the dawn of man, THOUSANDS of years ago, humans have known this.
Mankind has been using the lessons learned from nature to construct society.

For example:
Natural Selection in plants and animals was recognized by early man, and man has been **selectively** breeding animals for preferred traits in domesticated stock, pets as well as ornimental plants and food crops since.

Ancient man witnessed the rising and setting of the Sun, Moon, and other heavenly bodies, and have developed systems that predict, and incorporate these patterns such as clocks, calendars, as well as sending spacecraft to distant bodies in the solar system, and studying other systems billions of miles away.

Recently, a 13-year old kid theorized he could design a more efficient arrangement of solar cells by copying the pattern and arrangement of leaves on a tree. This is known as the Fionacci sequence. He proved his design was 20%-50% more efficient than a uniform array of the same number of solar cells.
http://inhabitat.com/13-year-old-makes-solar-...

NOBODY needs to be taught anything more regarding your childish "SCP Theory".

We've been using it for EONS.

If you think you can make a Unified Theory of SCP that will explain the mechanism of how all these diverse natural functions were 'designed', and who 'designed' them, GO FOR IT.

But please DROP the notion that you're an original thinker.

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#88785 May 8, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You forge the capital T
Have you never noticed that liars for their god always use a capital T when claiming Truth
That's to distinguish it from something actually being true
FREE SERVANT
#88786 May 8, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Holy CRAP you're a dim bulb, aint you?
YES. It is WIDELY acknowledged that there are systems, and cycles, and patterns that occur all the time within nature.
Since the dawn of man, THOUSANDS of years ago, humans have known this.
Mankind has been using the lessons learned from nature to construct society.
For example:
Natural Selection in plants and animals was recognized by early man, and man has been **selectively** breeding animals for preferred traits in domesticated stock, pets as well as ornimental plants and food crops since.
Ancient man witnessed the rising and setting of the Sun, Moon, and other heavenly bodies, and have developed systems that predict, and incorporate these patterns such as clocks, calendars, as well as sending spacecraft to distant bodies in the solar system, and studying other systems billions of miles away.
Recently, a 13-year old kid theorized he could design a more efficient arrangement of solar cells by copying the pattern and arrangement of leaves on a tree. This is known as the Fionacci sequence. He proved his design was 20%-50% more efficient than a uniform array of the same number of solar cells.
http://inhabitat.com/13-year-old-makes-solar-...
NOBODY needs to be taught anything more regarding your childish "SCP Theory".
We've been using it for EONS.
If you think you can make a Unified Theory of SCP that will explain the mechanism of how all these diverse natural functions were 'designed', and who 'designed' them, GO FOR IT.
But please DROP the notion that you're an original thinker.
YES, But some people seem to overlook these facts and put the wrong intrpretation to them.

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#88787 May 8, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
yourbackfkinghurts for a reason.
Personally, I would say myfkingbackhurts, but that's just me.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#88788 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>YES, But some people seem to overlook these facts and put the wrong intrpretation to them.
So, it's YOUR INTERPRETATION of all the countless and diverse systems, and cycles, and patterns (that humanity has already been aware of, and using btw), that YOU'RE going to educate us on?

I am turgid with anticipation.

[\SARCASM]

“Up with which, I will not put”

Since: Jul 08

Sao Paulo

#88789 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>YES, But some people seem to overlook these facts and put the wrong intrpretation to them.
Yes, in fact you exclusively.
FREE SERVANT
#88790 May 8, 2013
If I am teaching the wrong interpretation of SCP theory, then everyone here is invited to give a better one.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#88791 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
If I am teaching the wrong interpretation of SCP theory, then everyone here is invited to give a better one.
Let's break down your post above, shall we?
FREE SERVANT wrote:
If I am teaching ...
1. You have yet to present ANYTHING of value. You have taught NOTHING.
2. Who appointed you an expert at anything connected with either systems, or cycles, or patterns found in nature. You DO realize that the vast majority of these systems and cycles and patterns are not related to each other, right? If it is your contention that these ARE somehow connected, you've done a shitty job of presenting evidence for it.
FREE SERVANT wrote:
... the wrong interpretation ...
1. YOUR "interpretation". No data to back up your baseless assertions. Science is DATA. EVIDENCE. You have none. All you have is "interpretation", or opinion. Which is worthless.
FREE SERVANT wrote:
... of SCP theory...
1. There **IS** no SCP "theory". I'm sure this has been brought to your attention previously.
FREE SERVANT wrote:
...then everyone here is invited to give a better one.
Why? Nobody cares.
FREE SERVANT
#88792 May 8, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's break down your post above, shall we?
<quoted text>
1. You have yet to present ANYTHING of value. You have taught NOTHING.
2. Who appointed you an expert at anything connected with either systems, or cycles, or patterns found in nature. You DO realize that the vast majority of these systems and cycles and patterns are not related to each other, right? If it is your contention that these ARE somehow connected, you've done a shitty job of presenting evidence for it.
<quoted text>
1. YOUR "interpretation". No data to back up your baseless assertions. Science is DATA. EVIDENCE. You have none. All you have is "interpretation", or opinion. Which is worthless.
<quoted text>
1. There **IS** no SCP "theory". I'm sure this has been brought to your attention previously.
<quoted text>
Why? Nobody cares.
Everyboody should care how the true facts can be applied to problem-solving in times to come. We will need all the knowledge we can get for a firm foundation.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#88793 May 8, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Everyboody should care how the true facts can be applied to problem-solving in times to come. We will need all the knowledge we can get for a firm foundation.
RPG?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
6 letter word ...change one letter game (Oct '08) 6 min andet1987 32,280
*add A word / drop a word* (Nov '12) 6 min Alex Nicole 15,273
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 7 min LOST IN MISSISSIPPI 67,269
Funny!! Word association game. (Nov '13) 8 min Mutant-cucumber 5,305
Last Post Wins! (Aug '08) 8 min Alex Nicole 148,489
***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Jan '10) 10 min Mutant-cucumber 83,182
CHANGE One letter CHANCE (Sep '08) 11 min andet1987 35,670
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 19 min grace---f a l l e n 207,215
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 28 min Old Sam 22,241
A to Z songs by title or group! 1 hr liam cul8r 30
Poll What are you thinking right now? (May '08) 1 hr Snowflake Nation 2,481
More from around the web