Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.
Comments
80,301 - 80,320 of 115,405 Comments Last updated 23 min ago

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85007 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> No controversies, it is atheist and sceptics that just want to make things up.
According to History and research, Jesus actually lived.
Hey my brother-in-law is named Jesus...now let's see the PROOF that someone did the miraculous, water-walking and dead-walking that the NEW TESTAMENT claims...g'head, g'head...I'm waiting

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85009 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Jesus is indeed a historical figure, referenced repeatedly. So, what makes Nero or Xerxes more so, bodies. I'd love to see Xerxes, I hear he was a big sucker........
Answered your own question: bodies, writings, independent, verifiable evidence...Xerxes has monuments built IN HIS LIFETIME, Nero is recorded in ROman history IN HIS LIFETIME...funny how one of you morons(Chuckles, I think) claims a Jewish COnspiracy, yet the Josephus blurb gets tossed around like it's a fact...seems that when a Jew says something positive, it's a mitzvah...but when Jews fail to mention 'everything' it's a conspiracy...I remember the masturbation-fest over Simcha Jacobovici's claim he found the ossuary of James, validating the Jesus Tomb claims...WROOOONG...he's just an entertainer, at this point...so yes, bodies help, but with no DNA to compare it to, what would it matter to science...the fact is that there is no evidence for any miracle worker named Yeshua...period...Constatine gets the credit for Xianity.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#85010 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Jesus is indeed a historical figure, referenced repeatedly. So, what makes Nero or Xerxes more so, bodies. I'd love to see Xerxes, I hear he was a big sucker........
Only in your bible. No historical references. Nada, zero, zilch, bupkis.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#85011 Apr 5, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a supreme being in understanding and in physical reality and I can prove it simply as an absolute truth. You’re not going to agree because you are not a person who understanding is not founded on absolute truth because you are an agnostic. Your concept is a logical flaw and so will your understanding of knowledge will be as well.
The high priestess of stupid huh?

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#85012 Apr 5, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
Your words are illogical and childish only sayings in absolute truths can get my adrenalin going.
Then why do you insist on absolute stupendously extra super sized stupidness ?

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85013 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Then English from your premise could have been named another name, instead of English, because of its many influences. All languages had that influences and their origins and development remain intact, English is not an exception.
no, dummy, it's called English becuase the Anglo-Saxons(the SAxons and the Angles, Germanic tribes) spoke the language...English, as in England, as in Angland/Aengland, get the picture...and those tribes spoke their OWN languages of Germanic/Latin origins, dummy...we speak English in America(as in Amerigo Vespucci) becuase we CAMe over here with it!...DUH...tracing human history through language is VERY common...you think that people in Hawai'i peak English becuase they are German, or Norse or from the UK...your position is crushed, move along and leave the goalposts where the are, you've been crushed, skunked, rolled...OWN it, and man up

“Too hard to handle”

Level 4

Since: Jun 11

butler, pa

#85014 Apr 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no, that is not how science works. in fact it is the opposite, everything is up for peer review and rigorous examination.
you shouldn't talk of a field of study you clearly do not understand...
I was talking about character! The solopsism, vanity, extreme self centeredness of scientists. One dare ever question their magnificence. Get a scientist to say "I'm wrong" about anything? FAT CHANCE!

Darwin was so impressed with himself that he would have been hard pressed to even to even think there was another human being of his self estimated magnitude on the face of the planet!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85015 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Or Nero, or Caligula, or Spartacus or Cambyses or Xerxes. All are documented in the same manner as God and Jesus Christ. Do you deny their existence?
No, but i would deny they are deities...just like I would that jesus guy..

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85016 Apr 5, 2013
superwilly wrote:
<quoted text>
I was talking about character! The solopsism, vanity, extreme self centeredness of scientists. One dare ever question their magnificence. Get a scientist to say "I'm wrong" about anything? FAT CHANCE!
Darwin was so impressed with himself that he would have been hard pressed to even to even think there was another human being of his self estimated magnitude on the face of the planet!
ummm. i know many scientists that are the exact opposite of what you say.

and as to Darwin, as you would know if you had the intelligence to learn about someone before you attempt to slam them, had shelved his work for several years until an old friend wrote him from china with a paper promulgating a theory identical to Darwin's from his research there. darwin immediately pulled out his old study and promptly published it to beat him to it. so he knew for sure there were others able to see what he had observed.

learning is fun!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85017 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
U...huh. You're so funny woody. You ain't foolin' nobody. Seasonal worker, is that what they call collecting SSI now? Interesting.......
No, that is called already having two successful careers and now enjoying my life.

i am not old enough for Social security benefits yet...
Mary Magdalena

United States

#85018 Apr 5, 2013
Gillette wrote:
<quoted text>You DO realize that science does not EVER "totally prove things," right?

Seriously, have you even gone to college?

I see someone is going to have to explain the scientific method to you. Plus the meaning of "scientific theory."
"I see someone is going to have to explain the scientific method to you. Plus the meaning of "scientific theory."

Oh please could you mr. Gellybelly?

Funny this post in response to me saying that more less that we may not have absolute proof for God but we have evidence.

It looks as if You've got your dial set to full doofuses mode.

M&M
buckwheat

Tulsa, OK

#85019 Apr 5, 2013
Evolution. Because I have put away childish things.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85020 Apr 5, 2013
Mary Magdalena wrote:
<quoted text>
"I see someone is going to have to explain the scientific method to you. Plus the meaning of "scientific theory."
Oh please could you mr. Gellybelly?
Funny this post in response to me saying that more less that we may not have absolute proof for God but we have evidence.
It looks as if You've got your dial set to full doofuses mode.
M&M
that would be the very first shred of evidence for any god ever...please share!
Mary Magdalena

United States

#85021 Apr 5, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>It wouldn't help , she / um (what ever it is)
believes to be possessed by the spirit of GAWD.
Better call an exorcist or something, or give her Thorazine.
Maybe a Valium and a padded cell.
Are you feeling insecure?
Am I that threatening to you?

M&M

“Too hard to handle”

Level 4

Since: Jun 11

butler, pa

#85022 Apr 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>ummm. i know many scientists that are the exact opposite of what you say.
and as to Darwin, as you would know if you had the intelligence to learn about someone before you attempt to slam them, had shelved his work for several years until an old friend wrote him from china with a paper promulgating a theory identical to Darwin's from his research there. darwin immediately pulled out his old study and promptly published it to beat him to it. so he knew for sure there were others able to see what he had observed.
learning is fun!
I know some scientists that are not narcissistic, actually know these people.

I had read ALL of darwins works when I was in college and he WAS nacissistic. I wanted to make up my own mind about evolution and studied it. I studied original research.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#85023 Apr 5, 2013
buckwheat wrote:
Evolution. Because I have put away childish things.
Good answer, but keep just a bit in the corner of your mind for alternatives that might just blow your -- and my -- mind.
Mary Magdalena

United States

#85024 Apr 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>They are Christians. And Hitler was a Christian too.

You are using the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.

Just because they don't measure up to your standards of what a Christian is does not mean that they are not Christians.

If you want to claim that Kong and I are wrong you need to prove it. I do believe that Kong included a link that showed you are wrong.
"They are Christians. And Hitler was a Christian too. "

Sure they were.(Smirk)

WOW what can you say.

It's is true "topix atheist are a whole new breed stupidness. "

M&M
Mary Magdalena

United States

#85026 Apr 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, of course. Woodtick said there was no evidence for god and you called that lie. Logically that means you are claiming there is evidence for god.

So let's see it. Or don't you understand logic either?
"Yes, of course. Woodtick said there was no evidence for god and you called that lie. Logically that means you are claiming there is evidence for god."

Figured that out did you? Good I'm glad you're keeping up.

M&M
Mary Magdalena

United States

#85027 Apr 5, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
Yes, I was right.

MM, on the previous page you called this claim of woodtick's a lie:

"no person alive has ever given a shred of evidence for any god, gods or goddesses."

Do you realize that by calling that a lie you are in effect claiming there is evidence given by someone somewhere and who is still alive today that there is evidence for the existence of god.

So one more time: Where is that evidence?
"no person alive has ever given a shred of evidence for any god, gods or goddesses."

Of course this is a lie. Or just plain uneducated foot in mouth boosting.

M&M

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85028 Apr 5, 2013
superwilly wrote:
<quoted text>
I know some scientists that are not narcissistic, actually know these people.
I had read ALL of darwins works when I was in college and he WAS nacissistic. I wanted to make up my own mind about evolution and studied it. I studied original research.
Do you often show your own posts to be wrong? any reason the rest of us need to be here? it must never be lonely in your world huh?:)

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
ISIS just beheaded 9 min Big Time 21
Think you know who everyone is? (Feb '13) 14 min Big Time 467
What is your favorite DOLLAR STORE purchase? (Jun '09) 17 min Big Time 409
We Need New Topic To Discuss!!!!!! (Jul '06) 21 min Enter Username 211
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 23 min _Brenda_ 145,560
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 35 min -Lea- 18,729
only TWO words! (Nov '08) 43 min _Brenda_ 25,355
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 43 min Krypteia 36,114
Women Hid Stolen Watches in Their Vaginas in Bi... 2 hr beatlesinthebog 41
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••