Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 223191 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#84997 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And again, what hopes are you talking about.
Ofcourse, there was/ were no proper documentation during his life time, until after his death, which i gave the reason.
Jesus Christ existed and he is still in existence today.
Hilarious desperation...never existed, no evidence...and his immortality was a vote at Nicaea to get Xians to swing their votes to Constantine, the Emperor of the EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE, who was vying for power with the ...oh,read for yourself:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows...

You would've been a perfect pawn in Rome...an idiot from the neck up, and worthless from the neck down.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#84998 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you, it's interesting how the atheists squirm and wiggle when they cannot deny the Son of God. Writings produced regarding Christ two-thousand years ago have solidified God's standing, regardless of their pathetic sheep/goat herder theories. The dead sea scrolls were written long before that. It must be the reason why God and His Son have endured, they ARE REAL and will continue on long after the childish warblings of these atheists are silenced.
Yup as real as Santa, The Tooth Fairy, The Easter Bunny, Ganesha, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Thor, Superman,......
CBOW

Dover, PA

#84999 Apr 5, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
SSI? You have a problem with the disabled? Sheesh!
That would be SSD.

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85000 Apr 5, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not subjective if you apply a non-flawed logical concept to it in accordance on how the laws of nature work. Morality can be in harmony with nature.
You see it subjective because your logical approach may be flawed.
Mortality if looked at in a non-flawed logical concept a scientific moral law can be established that has nothing to do with religions and pseudo-sciences because nature governs morality (human behavior).
What kind of logical approach or you using and applying to mortality!
Huh? Morality is subjective by definition...we have conflicting "moral" laws amongst our states- check your marriage statutes for age minimums...you';re welcome to form a hypothesis, but this gets crushed before the ink dries on the grant application ROTFLMAO...do you religitards think that what you SAY is reality? Bwahahahaha...just love to watch the shoehorning, pretzeled logic and allaroubnd denial and apologies for a philosophy...just hilarious
CBOW

Dover, PA

#85001 Apr 5, 2013
Elohim wrote:
<quoted text>Yup as real as Santa, The Tooth Fairy, The Easter Bunny, Ganesha, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Thor, Superman,......
Or Nero, or Caligula, or Spartacus or Cambyses or Xerxes. All are documented in the same manner as God and Jesus Christ. Do you deny their existence?
Elohim

Branford, CT

#85002 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Or Nero, or Caligula, or Spartacus or Cambyses or Xerxes. All are documented in the same manner as God and Jesus Christ. Do you deny their existence?
No they are not. Nero et al are historical figures. Your god,jesus or any god for that matter are not.

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85003 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And i am also telling you that, all languages developed from one or more languages.
The French you are ranting about, had/ has alot of roots from Latin.
So, if French is unique to France, England is not an exception.
Listen, dumbass...the ENGLISH language of today came from OLD ENGLISH, which is known as Anglo-Saxon, named for the Germanic Saxons( a GErmanic tribe), the Angles(also from Germany and the name sake of ENGLAND) and Juts from the North(Scandinavians/Norse) who of course were also Germanic...of course the actual name of the current ruling house of the UK is actually the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty straight outta GErmany...so yes, lots of Americans have ancestors who were Brits, whom had ancestors from Germanic tribes...shocking, I know, and curiously none of the original Germanic tribes gacve a flip about yahweh or Jesus, they were pagans who9 held their tribal rituals as sacred, and so on and so forth...get an education...your flailing is now annoying.
CBOW

Dover, PA

#85004 Apr 5, 2013
Elohim wrote:
<quoted text>No they are not. Nero et al are historical figures. Your god,jesus or any god for that matter are not.
Wrong, Jesus is indeed a historical figure, referenced repeatedly. So, what makes Nero or Xerxes more so, bodies. I'd love to see Xerxes, I hear he was a big sucker........
CBOW

Dover, PA

#85005 Apr 5, 2013
superwilly wrote:
We should get back on topic. Creation vs evolution, not bash christians/bash athiests. I'm getting a little tired of that.
That will continue as long as one and/or the other refuses to accept that both are part of this world's beginnings and existence.

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85006 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> This you know is a dishonest response.
Christianity, we all know sprang up from Judaism, the Jewish Christians never fought a hard war, to win converts unlike Islam. They maintain faith, till the Romans saw the need for them to embrace the truth.
Just think!
\Ummmm...COnstantine was NEVER converted, but he happened to have a Bishop of a certain flavor of the 100s in the ROman Empire in the 4th century...Constantine persecuted, murederedf and summarily dogged the other Xian sects like the Gnostics...when he was done with the spear point-and-sword conversions, he ran back to the Eastern Empire to grab the Greeks, et al///he coddled them and the took the bait...your history is epically wrong...Xianity was merely a political plot to consolidate power...whomever opposed it, got smoted...that's they way it was...despite your f=arm flapping and foot stomping, your entire religion, as it stands today, is credited to a pagan emperor, who demanded a vote art Nicaea(SAnta Claus was there, too...but he was called Nicholas of Myra, the Bishop of Myra and he was ORTHODOX)...but you keep thinking it was some divinely guided process, I'll continue to study the REAL HISTORY...thanks for oplaying, junior, your consolation prize is in the back room.

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85007 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> No controversies, it is atheist and sceptics that just want to make things up.
According to History and research, Jesus actually lived.
Hey my brother-in-law is named Jesus...now let's see the PROOF that someone did the miraculous, water-walking and dead-walking that the NEW TESTAMENT claims...g'head, g'head...I'm waiting

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85009 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Jesus is indeed a historical figure, referenced repeatedly. So, what makes Nero or Xerxes more so, bodies. I'd love to see Xerxes, I hear he was a big sucker........
Answered your own question: bodies, writings, independent, verifiable evidence...Xerxes has monuments built IN HIS LIFETIME, Nero is recorded in ROman history IN HIS LIFETIME...funny how one of you morons(Chuckles, I think) claims a Jewish COnspiracy, yet the Josephus blurb gets tossed around like it's a fact...seems that when a Jew says something positive, it's a mitzvah...but when Jews fail to mention 'everything' it's a conspiracy...I remember the masturbation-fest over Simcha Jacobovici's claim he found the ossuary of James, validating the Jesus Tomb claims...WROOOONG...he's just an entertainer, at this point...so yes, bodies help, but with no DNA to compare it to, what would it matter to science...the fact is that there is no evidence for any miracle worker named Yeshua...period...Constatine gets the credit for Xianity.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#85010 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Jesus is indeed a historical figure, referenced repeatedly. So, what makes Nero or Xerxes more so, bodies. I'd love to see Xerxes, I hear he was a big sucker........
Only in your bible. No historical references. Nada, zero, zilch, bupkis.

“ad victoriam”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#85011 Apr 5, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a supreme being in understanding and in physical reality and I can prove it simply as an absolute truth. You’re not going to agree because you are not a person who understanding is not founded on absolute truth because you are an agnostic. Your concept is a logical flaw and so will your understanding of knowledge will be as well.
The high priestess of stupid huh?

“ad victoriam”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#85012 Apr 5, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
Your words are illogical and childish only sayings in absolute truths can get my adrenalin going.
Then why do you insist on absolute stupendously extra super sized stupidness ?

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#85013 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Then English from your premise could have been named another name, instead of English, because of its many influences. All languages had that influences and their origins and development remain intact, English is not an exception.
no, dummy, it's called English becuase the Anglo-Saxons(the SAxons and the Angles, Germanic tribes) spoke the language...English, as in England, as in Angland/Aengland, get the picture...and those tribes spoke their OWN languages of Germanic/Latin origins, dummy...we speak English in America(as in Amerigo Vespucci) becuase we CAMe over here with it!...DUH...tracing human history through language is VERY common...you think that people in Hawai'i peak English becuase they are German, or Norse or from the UK...your position is crushed, move along and leave the goalposts where the are, you've been crushed, skunked, rolled...OWN it, and man up

“too hard to handle”

Level 4

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#85014 Apr 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no, that is not how science works. in fact it is the opposite, everything is up for peer review and rigorous examination.
you shouldn't talk of a field of study you clearly do not understand...
I was talking about character! The solopsism, vanity, extreme self centeredness of scientists. One dare ever question their magnificence. Get a scientist to say "I'm wrong" about anything? FAT CHANCE!

Darwin was so impressed with himself that he would have been hard pressed to even to even think there was another human being of his self estimated magnitude on the face of the planet!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85015 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Or Nero, or Caligula, or Spartacus or Cambyses or Xerxes. All are documented in the same manner as God and Jesus Christ. Do you deny their existence?
No, but i would deny they are deities...just like I would that jesus guy..

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85016 Apr 5, 2013
superwilly wrote:
<quoted text>
I was talking about character! The solopsism, vanity, extreme self centeredness of scientists. One dare ever question their magnificence. Get a scientist to say "I'm wrong" about anything? FAT CHANCE!
Darwin was so impressed with himself that he would have been hard pressed to even to even think there was another human being of his self estimated magnitude on the face of the planet!
ummm. i know many scientists that are the exact opposite of what you say.

and as to Darwin, as you would know if you had the intelligence to learn about someone before you attempt to slam them, had shelved his work for several years until an old friend wrote him from china with a paper promulgating a theory identical to Darwin's from his research there. darwin immediately pulled out his old study and promptly published it to beat him to it. so he knew for sure there were others able to see what he had observed.

learning is fun!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#85017 Apr 5, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
U...huh. You're so funny woody. You ain't foolin' nobody. Seasonal worker, is that what they call collecting SSI now? Interesting.......
No, that is called already having two successful careers and now enjoying my life.

i am not old enough for Social security benefits yet...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
3 Word Advice (Good or Bad) (Dec '14) 5 min andet1987 6,446
'Double Letter S' (Dec '12) 11 min andet1987 1,194
*add A word / drop a word* (Nov '12) 17 min what a russsh 18,000
Add a Word remove a Word (Oct '13) 23 min what a russsh 5,693
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 25 min Dave 226,026
+=Keep 1 Drop 1=+ 3 STACK (Mar '13) 1 hr Camilla 12,625
only TWO words! (Nov '08) 1 hr andet1987 28,110
Last Post Wins! (Aug '08) 3 hr Princess Hey 150,841
Denny Crain's Place (May '10) 4 hr Emerald 32,191
JUST SAY SOMETHING. Whatever comes to mind!! (Aug '09) 4 hr honeymylove 34,386
Poll What are you thinking right now? (May '08) 8 hr honeymylove 6,721
More from around the web