Evolution vs. Creation

Jan 6, 2011 Read more: Best of New Orleans 159,635
High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Read more
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#84842 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And again, Mr. Ducky!
Jesus Christ, is the very base of Christianity. If truly his existence is false, there would be nothing like Christianity today. Evidence 2.
And again, the same Roman power, that the Jews used, paved the way for the gospel under Constantine. Evidence 3.
Mohammed is the base of Islam. If truly his existence is false there would be nothing like Islam today.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#84843 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And again, show me any country or nation in mainland Europe where English are taken as official language? Waiting!
Why do you continue to move the goalposts? Have you not got the intelligence to frame your questions correctly first time?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#84844 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> In continuation, if truly according to you, Jesus never existed. People of historical importance would not have talked and wrote about him.
If the Lord God Ra never existed then people of historical importance would not have talked and wrote about Him.
Charles Idemi wrote:
Pliny the Eldest and some others witnessed him, and he passed it, to his dear relative, Pliny the Young, who talked about Christ and his followers.
Yet Pliny the Elder never mentioned it in writing. His relative claimed that he claimed he met him. For all Pliny the Younger knew it could have just been some random drunk in a bar.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#84845 Apr 5, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Pliny the Elder, born in AD 23, in Italy. Given Jesus' birth date of 4 BC (possibly 6 BC) and his death at the age of 33, that means Pliny would have been six years old (possibly 4) when Jesus was crucified.
A six year old boy living more than thousand miles away does not sound like much of a witness to me. Whether later in life he heard of this new cult of Jesus is another question. But Pliny was no Jesus witness.
This stretching of the truth to support your hopes that Jesus was well documented merely shows up the fact that he was not.
Plus we already know that Jesus was not well documented, and Charles agreed.

It's all cuz of the Jewish conspiracy apparently.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#84846 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> That still does'nt count, like i said, people of historical importance like them wrote and talked about Christ. Like i earlier said, there were Jewish conspiracies, using the Roman strong holds to stop the whole Jesus issue, that was why there was no proper documentation after his death on earth.
So the fact that you have no evidence AND you know this doesn't count???
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#84847 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And again, what hopes are you talking about.
Ofcourse, there was/ were no proper documentation during his life time, until after his death, which i gave the reason.
Jesus Christ existed and he is still in existence today.
The only thing that's in existence today is his dead body.

And even that's debatable.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#84848 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Do you normally think with your eyes closed?
All languages has one or more influences with one another.
French( France), Spanish( Spain), Portuguese( Portugal), all has/ had influences from Latin, but the origin of those languages took place in those respective places and not Rome( Italy). Just admit your ignorance and think with both eyes opened.
The first part of your comment is what I have been replying to your stupid rants for the last 5 months, glad that you are capable of actual learning, even if it does take a long, long time.

As for your claim of “origin” I see you still have not yet looked up the meaning of the word and we know how stupid you are but that is no excuse for your ignorance when you have previously been told how and where to educate yourself. While you are at it you could look up the meaning of the word “developed” and consider the word in place of your totally incorrect usage of “origin”. You could also try reading a couple of the links I have provided on the origin of the English language. A little self education would do you no harm whatsoever, in fact it may actually benefit you and stop you looking as stupid.

BTW, you do not use your eyes to think, you use your brain and I, like many other people do there best thinking with their eyes closed, it cuts out distractions and often means you can consider deeper meanings and be more analytical. However if you can only think with your eyes open then it does explain why you are so stupid.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#84849 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Get a clue on the meaning of the word, " adoption ".
Most of these nations including yours, adopted English because of the English( people of England's influences).
Adoption???= Acceptance – NOT origin

So you are now saying that English was not the “original” English language but was adopted (accepted) by the English

I really do with you could make up your mind what you actually do mean

Listen to moron, I may be dyslexic but that does not mean I don’t know the meaning of words

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#84850 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> This clown is indeed very sick. Must you resort to insults all the time?
Any way, a typical nature of a loser.
Do you consider factual truth and insult?

Where is the insult in telling the truth?

Let me check back at my post, no, no insult there, nothing but factual truth.

1 people are not born with a belief in god – FACT

2 any belief an anything (including the god or gods of your choice) is learned - FACT

3 E=MC^2 shows than no omnipotent entity can exist in this universe – FACT – I suggest you look up the meaning of the word omnipotent and consider the implication, I also suggest you think about it with your eyes closed.

4 You have already proved you don’t understand evolution and from what I can gather from your posts you are afraid of the very idea – FACT

No insults, just truth (without a capital T)

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#84851 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> God bless.
This is an absolute truth.
You missed the capital T – surely you meant ‘T’ruth

Why do I know this, because FS made a faith based comment, not a factual and truthful (lower case t) comment

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#84852 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Typo Error:
I meant that, there is nothing God can not do.
He is above all things.
He can even correct errors – yes?

Sorry if that’s a bit too deep for you

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84853 Apr 5, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>There is no such thing as "sin". "Sins" are immoral acts according to religious belief and morality is subjective.
It's not subjective if you apply a non-flawed logical concept to it in accordance on how the laws of nature work. Morality can be in harmony with nature.

You see it subjective because your logical approach may be flawed.

Mortality if looked at in a non-flawed logical concept a scientific moral law can be established that has nothing to do with religions and pseudo-sciences because nature governs morality (human behavior).

What kind of logical approach or you using and applying to mortality!

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84854 Apr 5, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
A neuroscientist would know.
Science questions the God spot in the brain. ;-)
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm...
Such efforts to reveal the neural correlates of the divine—a new discipline with the warring titles “neurotheology” and “spiritual neuroscience”—not only might reconcile religion and science but also might help point to ways of eliciting pleasurable otherworldly feelings in people who do not have them or who cannot summon them at will. Because of the positive effect of such experiences on those who have them, some researchers speculate that the ability to induce them artificially could transform people’s lives by making them happier, healthier and better able to concentrate.
I aaw this on the science channel.

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#84855 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Countless!
Some of them includes, death, the universe, how did it came into form? it is never human's handiwork but God.
That is not proof, that is the supposition of faith

“I started out with nothing”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#84856 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> No Atheist whether living or dead had/ has/ have ever conclusively disproven the existence of God.
More of your babblings!
E=MC^2

Shows that no god as described in KJV Revelation 19:6 can exist in this universe

The guys name was Einstein, as to whether he was atheist or not is a tricky question, he referred to himself as agnostic and he certainly did not believe in the god of the babble or any other singular entity.

You are welcome to believe his equation or not, however whether you do believe it or not does not stop you exploiting the consequences of that equation.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84857 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry butt brain, I am not the one who accused a preacher and his wife of child murder, that was you, if you want to talk insults then feel free to try.
Now you have changes the question YET again, WTF is wrong with you? Is it a medical problem?
Several THOUSAND French words and I have never said that English was French I said that it derived from several languages. I also showed why where and how it is not unique as you claim
Just think instead of LYING in the face of your god
And i am also telling you that, all languages developed from one or more languages.
The French you are ranting about, had/ has alot of roots from Latin.
So, if French is unique to France, England is not an exception.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84858 Apr 5, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. I don't think you're a supreme being either.
I am a supreme being in understanding and in physical reality and I can prove it simply as an absolute truth. You’re not going to agree because you are not a person who understanding is not founded on absolute truth because you are an agnostic. Your concept is a logical flaw and so will your understanding of knowledge will be as well.
anonymous

Barberton, OH

#84859 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> That still does'nt count, like i said, people of historical importance like them wrote and talked about Christ. Like i earlier said, there were Jewish conspiracies, using the Roman strong holds to stop the whole Jesus issue, that was why there was no proper documentation after his death on earth.
Fine! Why couldn't have there been Christian conspiracies to invent the "Jesus" issue. A man is innocent until proven guilty. Not letting Jews into your country club, are you?

Well, you have plenty of liberal equivalents. They seem to always get the French maid fired after they shoot the Mexican gardener. It's not a funny Pink Panther movie from where I stand though.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#84860 Apr 5, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong! liar,liar lair,..uh , oh sorry, I had a pudddle gooist moment.
The idea is that an eternal God created life,... yours! is the myth that rocks and dirt came to life on it's own.
Whats more plausible? Only a radical member of a 2 percent cult would even ask that question.
Genesis 2:7
"Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being."

Explain how "dust of the ground" is significantly different from "rocks and dirt". Show your work.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#84861 Apr 5, 2013
The Dude wrote:
Hey everyone! Curtis said he's God! And I thought Shoob had a massive god-complex.
To be precise, Shoob thinks he's Jesus. A technicality, I know.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Last 3 Letters into 3 new words. (Dec '08) 12 min Red_Forman 56,511
***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Jan '10) 17 min Red_Forman 78,841
Add a word and drop a word (Jan '14) 18 min Red_Forman 3,090
Poll Can Married Women Be Friends With Single Men? (Jan '12) 19 min Jcasto48 3,480
ChANge "2" letter ChANgLE (Oct '14) 34 min Hoosier Hillbilly 133
"2" TWO word FUN game*** (Mar '13) 35 min Hoosier Hillbilly 1,404
~`*`~ Create a sentence using the 'letters' of ... (Oct '12) 36 min Hoosier Hillbilly 2,169
keep a word drop a word (Sep '12) 1 hr KNIGHT DeVINE 7,904
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 1 hr I Am No One_ 161,032
motorcycle traveling stories 4 hr Camilla 335
Whatcha' doing? (Apr '12) 6 hr Crazy Jae 8,281
More from around the web