Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 221445 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84386 Apr 2, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you think Gods or Goddesses would love to walk on the face of the Earth to experience life? In Buddhism, they can achieve this and become God incarnates. And many of us who are aware will fight for it, and will be claiming their place even to the extent of waging wars against each other. But others will just be unaware or unwilling. Maybe it's not this time right now. To me, it might be the last.
Very true “statement” proposed by the religion Buddha. Let’s define what a GOD or GODDESS is first before I comment in depth on your statements.

GOD or GODDESSES are supreme (absolute) being(s). To claim the title of supreme in the reality we live in you must be an individual that accepts, knows and speak in only absolute (supreme) truths. This is what gives you the supreme being(s) title because an absolute is what supreme is.

The absolute truth is the only SUPREME thing there is because it cannot be destroyed, dis-proven and it will always exist.
I /all humans have the birth right to claim their self a GOD or GODDESS because only they can choose to accept, speak and up-hold absolute truth. This is a vow I made because I love what I am and that is an absolute truth seeker.

You have the choice to be a GODDESS or not. Just remember what you have to do to claim the supreme title and it has nothing to do with controlling people.

Everyone wants to claim the supreme title (GOD or GODDESS) like you said. What little do they know supreme beings know that having this title is not about controlling/ruling people and I know this as a supreme being because the absolute truth I am, up-hold, speak and know will never take away an absolute quality you have as a birth-right called “The ability to choose”. IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CHOICE YOU MAKE to claim that supreme title and no-body can do that for you but your- self.

Remember a supreme being(s)/ GOD OR GODDESS control or rules “NO ONE”.

I know I am supreme and I know my understanding have no boundaries are limits (infinite) and I can prove this as an absolute truth. This is what people want and they fail to realize they all can have it and say the same things I say if they build their understanding on absolute truths and they will learn for themselves being a supreme being or calling yourself a GOD OR GODDESS have nothing to do with ruling over people and telling them what they can and can’t do by physical or coercive force!
Now that we clarified what a GOD or GODDESS is I encourage you not to let it be the last thing you want to call yourself.

People have the wrong idea on what a GOD or GODDESS!

Level 2

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#84387 Apr 2, 2013
THE INFAMOUS RACIST EVOLUTION BIOLOGIST, ILYA IVANOV
Learn how the racist history of Darwinism is marked by deception and genetic failure. HIV is an STD of apes, chimps and monkeys. Evolutionists assumed that blacks were closer genetically to apes and attempted to secretly create conception between humans and primates.

Ilya Ivanovich Ivanov, a Russian atheist biologist during the days of Stalin, tried to prove the evolution of man from apes by conducting bizarre fiendish experiments on African women and men in an attempt to create human-ape hybrids. As a result, this atheist psuedo-science called Darwinism may have led to the global epidemic of HIV and AIDS throughout Africa and around the world.

Level 6

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#84388 Apr 2, 2013
It's interesting that the same folks who want to pitch out the whole theory of evolution due to errors or miscues also want us to swallow the Bible as truth just because it has a fact or two in it.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84389 Apr 2, 2013
josie23 wrote:
THE INFAMOUS RACIST EVOLUTION BIOLOGIST, ILYA IVANOV
Learn how the racist history of Darwinism is marked by deception and genetic failure. HIV is an STD of apes, chimps and monkeys. Evolutionists assumed that blacks were closer genetically to apes and attempted to secretly create conception between humans and primates.
Ilya Ivanovich Ivanov, a Russian atheist biologist during the days of Stalin, tried to prove the evolution of man from apes by conducting bizarre fiendish experiments on African women and men in an attempt to create human-ape hybrids. As a result, this atheist psuedo-science called Darwinism may have led to the global epidemic of HIV and AIDS throughout Africa and around the world.
wow! did you get some bad information!

that is not how the HIV virus enterd the human bloodstream...
FREE SERVANT
#84390 Apr 2, 2013
EraserX wrote:
It's interesting that the same folks who want to pitch out the whole theory of evolution due to errors or miscues also want us to swallow the Bible as truth just because it has a fact or two in it.
WOW! Can I get a YES over here in the corner? Thank you for admitting the Bible is not all myth.

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#84391 Apr 2, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>WOW! Can I get a YES over here in the corner? Thank you for admitting the Bible is not all myth.
In exactly the same way as "Harry Potter" in not all myth

Level 6

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#84392 Apr 2, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>WOW! Can I get a YES over here in the corner? Thank you for admitting the Bible is not all myth.
Of course not. A lot of those stories have a grain of truth in them some where. That's not to say we should accept the book, in its entirety, as a whole truth though.

Recently, there was a movie out about Lincoln being a Vampire hunter. There were facts in that movie. This does not mean, however, we should all believe in vampires.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84393 Apr 2, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>WOW! Can I get a YES over here in the corner? Thank you for admitting the Bible is not all myth.
no, there are some historical facts in it. the myth parts are the ones about some god or gods...
FREE SERVANT
#84394 Apr 2, 2013
EraserX wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course not. A lot of those stories have a grain of truth in them some where. That's not to say we should accept the book, in its entirety, as a whole truth though.
Recently, there was a movie out about Lincoln being a Vampire hunter. There were facts in that movie. This does not mean, however, we should all believe in vampires.
Oh, I thought you were confessing that there are true statements somewhere in the Bible about the sugject matter. I was beginnng to celebrate too early, the storm clouds are gatherin again.....

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84395 Apr 2, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Been here before and what can I say? You totally ignored the facts then, seems to be one of you failings.
English STARTED in northern Europe, with a little Latin and French thrown in.
Like all languages it evolved and is still evolving today. The fact that much of that evolution happened in England makes no difference to the fact that as a language it did not start in England
Here is Meriam-Websters short history,
http://www.merriam-webster.com/help/faq/histo...
Note the –“The earliest period begins with the migration of certain Germanic tribes from the continent to Britain in the fifth century A.D.”
Also notice the influence of –“Latin, Old Norse (the language of the Viking invaders), and especially the Anglo-Norman French”
Now I know for certain that Meriam-Webster knows a bit more about the history of the English language than you do.
Wrong!
Did those language that influenced English similar to English, yes or no? No!
Latin, Greek, Norman French, etc, are never the same as English.
That is the reason why, English is unique to England. Think!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84396 Apr 2, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Been here before and what can I say? You totally ignored the facts then, seems to be one of you failings.
English STARTED in northern Europe, with a little Latin and French thrown in.
Like all languages it evolved and is still evolving today. The fact that much of that evolution happened in England makes no difference to the fact that as a language it did not start in England
Here is Meriam-Websters short history,
http://www.merriam-webster.com/help/faq/histo...
Note the –“The earliest period begins with the migration of certain Germanic tribes from the continent to Britain in the fifth century A.D.”
Also notice the influence of –“Latin, Old Norse (the language of the Viking invaders), and especially the Anglo-Norman French”
Now I know for certain that Meriam-Webster knows a bit more about the history of the English language than you do.
And again, show me one trace English in Northern or Main land Europe? Waiting!
English despite its many influences, started in England.

Level 6

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#84397 Apr 2, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, I thought you were confessing that there are true statements somewhere in the Bible about the sugject matter. I was beginnng to celebrate too early, the storm clouds are gatherin again.....
Of course there are true statements. For instance, there very likely WAS a great flood but not one that covered the whole world for 40 days. There likely might have been someone like to Noah - perhaps a farmer who rode out the flood in an upturned shed with a few of his livestock - but not an ark containing two of every animal. I mean, come on, that would be just silly.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84398 Apr 2, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>What does that have to do with your incorrect use of the term 'the roots of the English langauge'?
If you don't know, American English, Canadian English, Australian English and others, all had roots from England( English English).

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84399 Apr 2, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> If you don't know, American English, Canadian English, Australian English and others, all had roots from England( English English).
yes, and English as a whole has it roots exactly whee people have been telling you. in direct conflict with your statement.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84400 Apr 2, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Wrong!
Did those language that influenced English similar to English, yes or no? No!
Latin, Greek, Norman French, etc, are never the same as English.
That is the reason why, English is unique to England. Think!
ever heard of "e Pluribus Unum"? why are all the state mottos in Latin?

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#84402 Apr 2, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The language belongs to them? Yes!
By what measures? By origination, because anything English must have one or more connections with England.
I challenge you to find ANY link that agrees with your position that England **OWNS** the English language, or that the English languate "belongs" to England.

“ad victoriam”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#84403 Apr 2, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
I challenge you to find ANY link that agrees with your position that England **OWNS** the English language, or that the English languate "belongs" to England.
Charles es propiedad del idioma Inglés, y la policía de inglés van a arrestarlo.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84404 Apr 2, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Charles es propiedad del idioma Inglés, y la policía de inglés van a arrestarlo.
hijole! Que diversion!
jaynti

Pasadena, CA

#84405 Apr 2, 2013

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84406 Apr 2, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
What is language? Today we know that all life has it and it is a system consisting of arranged uttered or marked symbols. If language is to be communicated, it must be coherently uttered or written by an intelligent originator or source providing it. Communication is at its most heightened use in places that are regular meeting places where competetion for sustenance for maintainng ones life and that of families of kinds happen. A body of words or symbols are patterned to convey meaning to each kind and change is related to new or differing events if they are to be mentioned.
Yes, ordered information (language) comes from an intelligent (ability to choose) originator. DNA is ordered information as well. Each and every biological species has a fixed blue print.

How do you study and learn about the laws of nature that GOD created without using your bible. Remember, GOD created nature for man to observe and learn first. So how do you observe nature and tell me what is right and wrong.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Funny!! Word association game. (Nov '13) 3 min quilterqueen 5,735
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 4 min Sharlene45 217,217
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 4 min Important Weekend 75,295
Denny Crain's Place (May '10) 4 min TheJerseyDevil 21,899
keep a word drop a word (Sep '12) 6 min quilterqueen 15,799
Keep a Word.....Drop a Word Game (Sep '13) 7 min quilterqueen 13,271
Make highest comment in Offbeat topix forum (Dec '12) 8 min quilterqueen 80
A to Z songs by title or group! 1 hr Camilla 1,814
Poll What are you thinking right now? (May '08) 2 hr T Bone 4,086
More from around the web