Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.
Comments
79,181 - 79,200 of 112,918 Comments Last updated 45 min ago
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83814
Mar 29, 2013
 
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> No. That is YOUR contention that I don't accept "evolution".
You seem to have this need to portray me as some religious creationist.
You are dead wrong.
Actually as I tried to point out previously I am open-minded as to whether or not you're a creationist, UFO nut, or "free-thinker". I haven't come down yay or nay on any particular one yet. But like I said, the particulars aren't really relevant. Doesn't matter if we see false information spread by a creationist or some new-ager dude, we'll come down on it just the same either way.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83815
Mar 29, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Um... what on Earth (no pun intended) does the "extra-terrestrial" have to do with any of this?
Don't tell me we have another Infinite-Force!
:-/
Don't tell me you have no clue about supernova explosions and their effects on this planet.
Or solar flare and the effects of the cyclic activity of the sun on our planet.
Or the effects of meteor and cometary impact.
There is more, but that is enough for now.
Have you ever taken into account the timelines and effects these things have had on the planet in general and our civilization?
It appears you haven't as it might not fit that neat little paradigm which has been built by academia.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83816
Mar 29, 2013
 
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> Sure.
Can it prove I am related to Lucy?
Can it prove who and where people were before the last bottleneck in population?
DNA is a measure of how closely related biological organisms are. This is basic school-level biology.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83817
Mar 29, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought it was the Nicean Council using Paulanity as their guide.(shrug)
False!
Read the works of Paul in Hebrews, Ephesians, etc. And see how he referenced Christ.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83818
Mar 29, 2013
 
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> No Mikie, there was flood that is the major goal, and the bible said so. Period.
Yes, the Bible is true cuz teh Bible sez so! Just ignore the bit where it got the flood totally wrong.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83819
Mar 29, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually if changes provide an advantage that's a darn good reason why those characteristics spread through populations.
LOL!
So, you are saying there is a "goal" to improve the species?
By who?
God?
Or do the people just pick a mutation and run with it because they like it?
Hahahahah!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83820
Mar 29, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Accreted solar disk particles...
Solar?
How did the solar or sun came into form?

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83821
Mar 29, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, gotcha. It's the evil world-wide atheist Darwinist evolutionist elitist scientist liberal socialist Communist Nazi anti-Christian God-hating Satan-worshipping baby-eating Jewish Illumanati conspiracy at work then.
If that's what you want to believe, have at it.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83822
Mar 29, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no chippy, there was no global flood in humans' time. period
your cult lied to you...again...
The issue was that, there was flood and the bible said so. Period.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83823
Mar 29, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, so you accept evolution then. Jolly good!
I've tried ta tell ya that several times, but I guess you are desperate ta have an enemy or whatever.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83824
Mar 29, 2013
 
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> Geesus krist you are thick.
I don't deny evolution. I question the people who are "using" it poorly and/or wrongly for personal gain.
That's nice. But your claim is rather generic and smacks of just a little bit of paranoia to say the least. And keeping in mind that the hypothesis of common ancestry (kinda the whole point of the modern evolutionary synthesis if you didn't know) is accepted by the vast majority of the biological community, and that further, that is where most of your strenuous objections lie, that is why the amount of your "acceptance" of evolution is questioned.
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
And yes, there have been many arguments and controversies regarding the research and discoveries.
Not by the biological community as a whole. Remember we discount creationists and quacks because they have no scientific basis. So no, the DI, AIG, ICR doth not constitute a "controversy". Neither does an idiot like Senapathy or von Daniken. An example of a genuine scientific controversy WITHIN evolution would be Alan Feduccia's position over dino-bird ancestry, or Gould's punctuated equilibria. Again, it's HOW evolution occurred is where the "controversies" are, not whether or not it DID occur.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83825
Mar 29, 2013
 
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> LOL!
So, you are saying there is a "goal" to improve the species?
By who?
God?
Or do the people just pick a mutation and run with it because they like it?
Hahahahah!
No, I'm not claiming there's a goal. And nor do the animals "choose" it. Again you are misunderstanding the concept, making the exact same mistake as the fundies do. Mutations occur, and they can be good, bad or indifferent. If neutral they will have a negligible effect on reproduction. If detrimental they will cause problems for reproduction. Maybe even to the point of extinction. If successful, successful mutations will spread through the population quicker than detrimental ones, hence further on down the line the resulting population will be "improved". This is natural selection.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83826
Mar 29, 2013
 
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> If that's what you want to believe, have at it.
Not MY beliefs.(shrug)

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83827
Mar 29, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny, I thought it was just made by humans and this, being only 12,000 years old tops was more of archaeological significance rather than evolutionary significance.(shrug)
Just checking, you're not a von Däniken fan are you?
Nope. But it surely doesn't fit the accepted timeline and developed society posited for the time. Some day it will have to be recognized for what it is or the world will laugh at the scientific community as fools and stop supporting their efforts.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83828
Mar 29, 2013
 
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The issue was that, there was flood and the bible said so. Period.
Big deal. There was a rainstorm and the Koran said so.

See the problem?

No, of course you don't.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83829
Mar 29, 2013
 
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> I've tried ta tell ya that several times, but I guess you are desperate ta have an enemy or whatever.
Not really. Already have plenty on here!

>;-)

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83830
Mar 29, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Depends on how long they were gone and how much genetic divergence had taken place. We know that neanderthals were able to interbreed with us although they were different enough to be noted as a distinct subspecies of humans. Until we hunted them or shagged them into oblivion that is.
It could have been a viral infection introduced to them like was the case in the Americas.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83831
Mar 29, 2013
 
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Yes my ancestors died, so that I might live, they just had no fuggin clue about me :).
My parents were creationists, the screwed and created me.
But it wasn't regression, they created the perfect animal...he he heh
Hahahah! Hey Aura!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83832
Mar 29, 2013
 
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> It could have been a viral infection introduced to them like was the case in the Americas.
very well could have been. from the history of humans, the killing off by homo sapiens would have the highest probability, along with any infections...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83833
Mar 29, 2013
 
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> Nope. But it surely doesn't fit the accepted timeline and developed society posited for the time. Some day it will have to be recognized for what it is or the world will laugh at the scientific community as fools and stop supporting their efforts.
is that like when you said they built things with more precision than we can today?*snicker*

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••