Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#83815 Mar 29, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Um... what on Earth (no pun intended) does the "extra-terrestrial" have to do with any of this?
Don't tell me we have another Infinite-Force!
:-/
Don't tell me you have no clue about supernova explosions and their effects on this planet.
Or solar flare and the effects of the cyclic activity of the sun on our planet.
Or the effects of meteor and cometary impact.
There is more, but that is enough for now.
Have you ever taken into account the timelines and effects these things have had on the planet in general and our civilization?
It appears you haven't as it might not fit that neat little paradigm which has been built by academia.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#83816 Mar 29, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> Sure.
Can it prove I am related to Lucy?
Can it prove who and where people were before the last bottleneck in population?
DNA is a measure of how closely related biological organisms are. This is basic school-level biology.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#83817 Mar 29, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought it was the Nicean Council using Paulanity as their guide.(shrug)
False!
Read the works of Paul in Hebrews, Ephesians, etc. And see how he referenced Christ.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#83818 Mar 29, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> No Mikie, there was flood that is the major goal, and the bible said so. Period.
Yes, the Bible is true cuz teh Bible sez so! Just ignore the bit where it got the flood totally wrong.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#83819 Mar 29, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually if changes provide an advantage that's a darn good reason why those characteristics spread through populations.
LOL!
So, you are saying there is a "goal" to improve the species?
By who?
God?
Or do the people just pick a mutation and run with it because they like it?
Hahahahah!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#83820 Mar 29, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Accreted solar disk particles...
Solar?
How did the solar or sun came into form?

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#83821 Mar 29, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, gotcha. It's the evil world-wide atheist Darwinist evolutionist elitist scientist liberal socialist Communist Nazi anti-Christian God-hating Satan-worshipping baby-eating Jewish Illumanati conspiracy at work then.
If that's what you want to believe, have at it.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#83822 Mar 29, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no chippy, there was no global flood in humans' time. period
your cult lied to you...again...
The issue was that, there was flood and the bible said so. Period.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#83823 Mar 29, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, so you accept evolution then. Jolly good!
I've tried ta tell ya that several times, but I guess you are desperate ta have an enemy or whatever.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#83824 Mar 29, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> Geesus krist you are thick.
I don't deny evolution. I question the people who are "using" it poorly and/or wrongly for personal gain.
That's nice. But your claim is rather generic and smacks of just a little bit of paranoia to say the least. And keeping in mind that the hypothesis of common ancestry (kinda the whole point of the modern evolutionary synthesis if you didn't know) is accepted by the vast majority of the biological community, and that further, that is where most of your strenuous objections lie, that is why the amount of your "acceptance" of evolution is questioned.
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
And yes, there have been many arguments and controversies regarding the research and discoveries.
Not by the biological community as a whole. Remember we discount creationists and quacks because they have no scientific basis. So no, the DI, AIG, ICR doth not constitute a "controversy". Neither does an idiot like Senapathy or von Daniken. An example of a genuine scientific controversy WITHIN evolution would be Alan Feduccia's position over dino-bird ancestry, or Gould's punctuated equilibria. Again, it's HOW evolution occurred is where the "controversies" are, not whether or not it DID occur.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#83825 Mar 29, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> LOL!
So, you are saying there is a "goal" to improve the species?
By who?
God?
Or do the people just pick a mutation and run with it because they like it?
Hahahahah!
No, I'm not claiming there's a goal. And nor do the animals "choose" it. Again you are misunderstanding the concept, making the exact same mistake as the fundies do. Mutations occur, and they can be good, bad or indifferent. If neutral they will have a negligible effect on reproduction. If detrimental they will cause problems for reproduction. Maybe even to the point of extinction. If successful, successful mutations will spread through the population quicker than detrimental ones, hence further on down the line the resulting population will be "improved". This is natural selection.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#83826 Mar 29, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> If that's what you want to believe, have at it.
Not MY beliefs.(shrug)

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#83827 Mar 29, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny, I thought it was just made by humans and this, being only 12,000 years old tops was more of archaeological significance rather than evolutionary significance.(shrug)
Just checking, you're not a von Däniken fan are you?
Nope. But it surely doesn't fit the accepted timeline and developed society posited for the time. Some day it will have to be recognized for what it is or the world will laugh at the scientific community as fools and stop supporting their efforts.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#83828 Mar 29, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The issue was that, there was flood and the bible said so. Period.
Big deal. There was a rainstorm and the Koran said so.

See the problem?

No, of course you don't.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#83829 Mar 29, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> I've tried ta tell ya that several times, but I guess you are desperate ta have an enemy or whatever.
Not really. Already have plenty on here!

>;-)

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#83830 Mar 29, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Depends on how long they were gone and how much genetic divergence had taken place. We know that neanderthals were able to interbreed with us although they were different enough to be noted as a distinct subspecies of humans. Until we hunted them or shagged them into oblivion that is.
It could have been a viral infection introduced to them like was the case in the Americas.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#83831 Mar 29, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Yes my ancestors died, so that I might live, they just had no fuggin clue about me :).
My parents were creationists, the screwed and created me.
But it wasn't regression, they created the perfect animal...he he heh
Hahahah! Hey Aura!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#83832 Mar 29, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> It could have been a viral infection introduced to them like was the case in the Americas.
very well could have been. from the history of humans, the killing off by homo sapiens would have the highest probability, along with any infections...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#83833 Mar 29, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text> Nope. But it surely doesn't fit the accepted timeline and developed society posited for the time. Some day it will have to be recognized for what it is or the world will laugh at the scientific community as fools and stop supporting their efforts.
is that like when you said they built things with more precision than we can today?*snicker*

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Level 1

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#83834 Mar 29, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
What you personally buy is irrelevant. "Disorders" is subjective. Mutations can be beneficial, detrimental or neutral. All humans are born with around on average 125 to 175 mutations as normal. Most are neutral.
<quoted text>
But anything passed on through the germ line IS passed on to new generations. That's how you end up with half your DNA from your mother and half from your father. This is how reproduction works. You will not gain any mutations your parents got from sunburn.
<quoted text>
If your father is born with a mutation and it's passed on to you, technically speaking it is not a mutation when describing the same DNA base(s) in your genome. It IS described as a mutation in HIS genome because neither of his parents had it. A mutation is simply a change of DNA. And DNA does change with each generation.
Right. And that "germ" line is passed from your parents. You do not "develop" them afterwards.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
last word/first word. (Apr '12) 4 min andet1987 5,145
Make A Sentance out of a 5 letter word. (Nov '09) 9 min andet1987 30,284
how to forget a person u love but has hurt u? (Apr '11) 9 min Life after Love 286
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 10 min eschew on this 25,419
Trish David James is Ferrermen 11 min Life after Love 6
True or False Game 12 min Princess Hey 1,241
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 15 min Sublime1 152,342
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 39 min Shaddup 37,714
Merry Christmas Topix, Thanks For,...? 3 hr chortle 68