Of course creationism is falsifiable!<quoted text>
That's because creationism is non-falsifiable and hence not scientific.
If you can prove that an mindless, chaotic, unnatural forces can create a an efficient universe as this over the dispensation of millions of years; then you can prove that creationism is falsehood.
And you know what all those experiments in synthesizing proteins and living cells prove?
THEY PROVE THAT AN INTELLIGENT AGENT CAN SYNTHESIZE LIVING CELLS AND PROTEINS.
Do we need to?Another slight problem (for you)- evolution makes successful predictions based on those physical features. Creationism does not.
And even if we did, we could just use some of yours. Science dis not in conflict with God; scientists are... duh.
My argument still stands:That's why evolution can say if it's likely that we'll find a fossil with feathers and three middle-ear bones. That's why it can say if it's likely we'll find a pre-Cambrian rabbit or not. That's why it actually predicts the location of fossils and FINDS them.
The similarities between the appearances of the remains of different organisms, does not have to be more than that; remains that have similarities in their appearances.
We know that every now and then, mutant genes produce some "differentiated" offspring. But that these mutations take the form of an on-going "evolution" is just your contribution.