Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216925 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#81859 Mar 19, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>"Go through his pockets and look for loose change."
I forgot about that part. I was just remembering more or less. I still love that movie.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#81860 Mar 19, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>I forgot about that part. I was just remembering more or less. I still love that movie.
It's in my all-time Top 10.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#81861 Mar 19, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
you presumed to know...and that's it. the earth could have very well been cover with water at the time.
There has never been a time when the whole earth was completely covered by water in at least the past 20,000,000 years....possibly as far back as 2.5 billion years.

Every legitimate geologists on earth will tell you this

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#81862 Mar 19, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>I have been both busy and very well thank you. I have been devoting my time in rendering to practice the very science these creationist clamor so to disavow. In less dramatic sounding terms, things got busy at work.
How have you been doing Word? I ran into Chilli J on another forum we occassionally cross paths in, but other than that, I have left the debate here and there to him, you and the others of those better than myself to carry on. I have missed the exchange of ideas and the practice in arguing though. And the humor.
Glad you're back.
a_friend

Reading, PA

#81863 Mar 19, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
There has never been a time when the whole earth was completely covered by water in at least the past 20,000,000 years....possibly as far back as 2.5 billion years.
Every legitimate geologists on earth will tell you this
I wonder how they would know this if no human existed yet? No pun intended, just a thought.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#81864 Mar 19, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>It's in my all-time Top 10.
I would have to rank it among my Top 10 too, or suffer the terror of the R.O.U.S.'s.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#81865 Mar 19, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
There has never been a time when the whole earth was completely covered by water in at least the past 20,000,000 years....possibly as far back as 2.5 billion years.
Every legitimate geologists on earth will tell you this
That has been my understanding based on my reading and discussions on here.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#81866 Mar 19, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
Glad you're back.
Thanks. It is good to be able to rejoin the discussion. I hope I can visit more frequently as my schedule allows.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#81867 Mar 19, 2013
a_friend wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder how they would know this if no human existed yet? No pun intended, just a thought.
Well, for one they know how to tell when a rock was in salinated water or not.
a_friend

Reading, PA

#81868 Mar 19, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, for one they know how to tell when a rock was in salinated water or not.
Sure, but for how long? There is no guaranteed accuracy in this observation.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#81869 Mar 20, 2013
a_friend wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure, but for how long? There is no guaranteed accuracy in this observation.
Accuracy within 100 years in most cases.
a_friend

Reading, PA

#81870 Mar 20, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Accuracy within 100 years in most cases.
100, thats pretty close, what source did you find this information out?

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#81871 Mar 20, 2013
a_friend wrote:
<quoted text>
100, thats pretty close, what source did you find this information out?
I am guessing by this question that you have done no research into scientific matters at all. Considering you ask for only one source, and you expect the list of sources to be able to fit into a reply on here .... you need to learn how to learn.

“In God we trust”

Level 7

Since: Dec 12

Cape Town, South Africa

#81872 Mar 20, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No there is no such evidence, unless you have something that everyone missed.
There is a ton of evidence.

Yes, scientists believe more in evolution, but they found the ark and it estimated the exact length of Noah's ark.

Really I'm not lying

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#81873 Mar 20, 2013
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a ton of evidence.
Yes, scientists believe more in evolution, but they found the ark and it estimated the exact length of Noah's ark.
Really I'm not lying
No you aren't lying, you're just gullible. They were lying, the people claiming to have found it. You should be a little more ready to question authority instead of just buying what they hand you. So far no one has presented any evidence supporting your religion ... shall you be the first ... ever?

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#81874 Mar 20, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Well on that we can agree. It is definitely funny or I would not have written it.
Sorry to hear that you wake up at 2am to feed and then poop your pants. That has got to be rough on you the next day.
lol...like I said, your a regular barrel of monkeys.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#81875 Mar 20, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
lol...like I said, your a regular barrel of monkeys.
I can see you have gone ape over me, or at least you are sharing a common ancestor with the ape you are going over me.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#81876 Mar 20, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No you aren't lying, you're just gullible. They were lying, the people claiming to have found it. You should be a little more ready to question authority instead of just buying what they hand you. So far no one has presented any evidence supporting your religion ... shall you be the first ... ever?
Kitten, the Ark is at the bottom of Loch Ness. No one can get close enough to take a photo or gather other evidence, because it is being guarded by a pesky aquatic dinosaur.

It is the unfortunate luck that, while many have seen the Ark and other miraculous things, no one has had the forethought to gather evidence. Perhaps, they should send some smarter creationist out on these explorations.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#81877 Mar 20, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No there is no such evidence, unless you have something that everyone missed.
January 2009 Early Earth 'was covered in water'

http://www.earthdive.com/site/news/newsdetail...

I posted this story 3 or 4 times in the last week...

"A new model of the early Earth suggests that until around 2.5 billion years ago oceans covered almost the whole of the planet.

Just 2% to 3% of the Earth's surface would have been dry land, compared with 28% today.

The Earth at that time may have resembled the way it looked in Waterworld, the 1995 post-apocalyptic sci-fi movie starring Kevin Costner."

I posted this story 3 or 4 times in the last week...

I think you even commented on it.
and now you claim that there is "no such evidence"

Apparently monkeys see only what they want to see.lol

FREE SERVANT
#81878 Mar 20, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Kitten, the Ark is at the bottom of Loch Ness. No one can get close enough to take a photo or gather other evidence, because it is being guarded by a pesky aquatic dinosaur.
It is the unfortunate luck that, while many have seen the Ark and other miraculous things, no one has had the forethought to gather evidence. Perhaps, they should send some smarter creationist out on these explorations.
The Ark itself may have been a compartmentalized container made of wood and how it was protected from the devastation of the flood may be beyond our advanced scientific knowledge of today, because the CREATOR had a hand in it's construction.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Last two letters into two new words... (Jun '15) 4 min Old Sam 5,876
Interesting Quotes (Jun '11) 6 min Old Sam 16,879
6 letter word ...change one letter game (Oct '08) 8 min Old Sam 32,279
CHANGE One letter CHANCE (Sep '08) 9 min SUG here 35,668
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 9 min beatlesinthebog 22,237
Keep a Word.....Drop a Word Game (Sep '13) 10 min Old Sam 12,814
***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Jan '10) 10 min Old Sam 83,179
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 33 min Gunthram 207,209
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 50 min 8541 MARINE 67,268
Poll What are you thinking right now? (May '08) 1 hr Majority should rule 2,480
What Turns You Off (Jun '11) 1 hr beatlesinthebog 10,652
What turns you on ? (Aug '11) 5 hr Lelouch0 1,525
More from around the web