Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Read more

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81548 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
did you miss this Woody?
No.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81549 Mar 18, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>This thread would be a good place to present one. Oh wait, thare are how many regular readers here? ;)
yes, it would be, wouldn't it? why has no proponent of ID ever put up even a hypothesis for ID? could it be that there isn't even enough evidence for it to even make hypothesis?

yes, that would be why.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81550 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
First we have to define God.
Myth...there that part is done. where's the hypothesis?
FREE SERVANT

Bellevue, WA

#81551 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
First we have to define God.
Wouldn't we say God is the one that brought the universe into existence?

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81552 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
You are dodging my question. You have nothing to offer at this point.
No, i asked you to clarify the question. putting up some post where i asked "why not" gives me no frame of reference to the the question. if it had been on the same page or a recent post, it could be acceptable, but it wasn't.

as i said, you do not even know how to ask a proper question. no wonder you don't know shit about your own world.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81553 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>No.
So which fish are you? lol

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#81554 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
How would you hypothesize evidence for intelligence for everything that exists when intelligence are exhibited in different ways that we now identify as different branches of science?
Of course there are ways to try to find evidence. Unfortunately for the IDists they have been wrong every time they made a solid claim in the past.

For example the concept of "irreducible complexity" used to be the battle cry of the IDiots. Unfortunately for them they always chose problems that were on the cutting edge of research.

One guess as to what happens in research.

And of course it is not up to me to provide the ID people with a testable hypothesis. It is up to them.

The first step in science is observation. Evidence does not become evidence until people observe it and think about it. They need to observe nature and to think of what they observe. When evidence is observed enough the testing is very often suggested by the evidence itself.

The problem with this is that if you are wrong you may not ever find any evidence that supports your belief.

Hmm, and which side has a noticeable lack of evidence?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#81555 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
No I know you're just doing your job and I am a threat to you. lol
Please, don't go the Jimbo route.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#81556 Mar 18, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Wouldn't we say God is the one that brought the universe into existence?
Not without evidence. If you think that something as complex as the universe needs a creator then doesn't the even more complex creator need a creator and so on up the line? If you cut off the line at your god why not cut it off at the point that we have evidence of. Cut off creation at the universe. For all we know as long as time has existed the universe has existed.

And even if we say there is a god that still has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution works just fine in a universe with a god. It works just fine in a universe without a god.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81557 Mar 18, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Not without evidence. If you think that something as complex as the universe needs a creator then doesn't the even more complex creator need a creator and so on up the line? If you cut off the line at your god why not cut it off at the point that we have evidence of. Cut off creation at the universe. For all we know as long as time has existed the universe has existed.
And even if we say there is a god that still has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution works just fine in a universe with a god. It works just fine in a universe without a god.
Try new and improved ULTRA CREATOR!!!! call now and recieve our "Trilogy" special offer. three ULTRA CREATORS!!!! for the price of one!*

Call now, operators lways have been, and always will be, standing by.

*"trilogy" offer not available in Mecca or East Jerusalem. tax, title, dealer prep extra....

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81558 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
So which fish are you? lol
i'm still waiting for all this hard science stuff that supports ID that you claim? where is it? shouldn't you be working on that?

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81559 Mar 18, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Wouldn't we say God is the one that brought the universe into existence?
Why would we say that? there is no evidence of any god so why would any rational person even bring that myth into the conversation?

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81560 Mar 18, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Please, don't go the Jimbo route.
Too late.
Mark

Portland, OR

#81561 Mar 18, 2013
Mark wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I gave you 2 mechanisms for evolution, can you give us yours? If you cannot explain it from a cell/DNA standpoint, which MUST fit (see my earlier posts) then is your only option to belittle and sterotype? Does that make you scientific and me not? Sorry you can't make a living on that. Your talking to a guy with a few Hi-tech patents here that MUST WORK to benefit society.
M
Still waiting for your mechanism for evolution that you beleive is scientific.. That mean's it's testable and repeatable = sceintific, right? The silence is screaming!

M

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81562 Mar 18, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Not without evidence. If you think that something as complex as the universe needs a creator then doesn't the even more complex creator need a creator and so on up the line? If you cut off the line at your god why not cut it off at the point that we have evidence of. Cut off creation at the universe. For all we know as long as time has existed the universe has existed.
And even if we say there is a god that still has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution works just fine in a universe with a god. It works just fine in a universe without a god.
I guess we live in two different worlds. lol

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81563 Mar 18, 2013
Mark wrote:
<quoted text>
Still waiting for your mechanism for evolution that you beleive is scientific.. That mean's it's testable and repeatable = sceintific, right? The silence is screaming!
M
Are you arguing with yourself now Mark? where are those Hubble pics of the center of the universe you said you saw?

if you can't find them, can you just make up more entertaining bullshit?

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#81564 Mar 18, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm definitely into the female version.
Shame on me....
Somebody here once claimed that they serve no purpose.:-/

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#81566 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess we live in two different worlds. lol
yes, he lives in the rational world ruled by facts and logic and you just make up crap as you go in your little fantasy world.

pone is real.. one yours is delusional.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#81567 Mar 18, 2013
Mark wrote:
<quoted text>
Still waiting for your mechanism for evolution that you beleive is scientific.. That mean's it's testable and repeatable = sceintific, right? The silence is screaming!
M
The mechanism for evolution are the driving forces of natural selection and variation affecting the alleles of a population.

There are many repeatable scientific observations of this occurring. From the fossil record to the laboratory. There have been countless repeatable tests done.

Can you be more specific in your demands for a test?

Odds are your demand will show that you do not understand the theory of evolution at all.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#81568 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess we live in two different worlds. lol
Possibly. I live in the real world. Many of your posts indicate otherwise for you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Goats Milk with Princess (Jan '10) 2 min Proud To Be Trina 46,452
3 Word Advice (Good or Bad) 2 min Beautiful Black M... 1,225
***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Jan '10) 5 min _FLATLINE-------- 78,557
CHANGE One letter CHANCE (Sep '08) 6 min andet1987 31,199
Word Association (Mar '10) 10 min harlehoney 16,792
Add 2 Letters to Complete a Word 11 min andet1987 410
Word Association (Jun '10) 13 min harlehoney 26,986
Denny Crain's Place (May '10) 33 min harlehoney 18,008
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 48 min NinaRocks 40,001
Poll Can single Men be friends with Married Women? (Jun '12) 1 hr Sublime1 204
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 2 hr I Am No One_ 159,919
More from around the web