Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 221445 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81525 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Still couldn't find that ID "hard science stuff" you lied about? why not?
Hey I was responding to Mark's comment about ID. I'm not advocating ID so don't ask me for a hypothesis or evidence, ask the creation scientists. I only believe that there is a pantheistic God. comprende?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81526 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>why not?
I see you don't have an explanation either.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#81527 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey I was responding to Mark's comment about ID. I'm not advocating ID so don't ask me for a hypothesis or evidence, ask the creation scientists. I only believe that there is a pantheistic God. comprende?
yet you said there was "hard science stuff" whatever the hell that is...for ID.

what is that harde science stuff? or just more BS from Cybele?

is anything you say not bullshit? why would anyone think it isn't?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81528 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>yet you said there was "hard science stuff" whatever the hell that is...for ID.
what is that harde science stuff? or just more BS from Cybele?
is anything you say not bullshit? why would anyone think it isn't?
HARD SCIENCE - any of the natural or physical sciences, as chemistry, biology, physics, or astronomy, in which aspects of the universe are investigated by means of hypotheses and experiments.

All of those describe our natural world with empirical evidence. If you can't find intelligence in the description of this natural world, you are either in denial, or don't know what defines intelligence.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#81529 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
HARD SCIENCE - any of the natural or physical sciences, as chemistry, biology, physics, or astronomy, in which aspects of the universe are investigated by means of hypotheses and experiments.
All of those describe our natural world with empirical evidence. If you can't find intelligence in the description of this natural world, you are either in denial, or don't know what defines intelligence.
What is the particular hard science stuff that supports ID?

just saying the world shows intelligence isn't even close to an answer, unless you don't know what the hell you are talking about, which certainly you have proved to be true time and time again...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#81530 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you don't have an explanation either.
explanation for what? ami supposed to know what a two word quote was about from some unreferenced past?

you don't even know how to ask a proper question...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#81531 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
HARD SCIENCE - any of the natural or physical sciences, as chemistry, biology, physics, or astronomy, in which aspects of the universe are investigated by means of hypotheses and experiments.
All of those describe our natural world with empirical evidence. If you can't find intelligence in the description of this natural world, you are either in denial, or don't know what defines intelligence.
then why is there not even a hypothesis of ID?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81532 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>then why is there not even a hypothesis of ID?
No one has attempted to unify all the branches of hard science and atheists like you get in the way of progression.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81533 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>explanation for what? ami supposed to know what a two word quote was about from some unreferenced past?
you don't even know how to ask a proper question...
keep up with the conversation and learn to carry on. You responded to my post with that question.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#81534 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
No one has attempted to unify all the branches of hard science and atheists like you get in the way of progression.
if no-one has attempted it, how could anyone have gotten in the way?

Are you really that stupid? you ae making a fool of yourself...

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81536 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>if no-one has attempted it, how could anyone have gotten in the way?
Are you really that stupid? you ae making a fool of yourself...
That's why there is no progress in the first place, because you atheists are a threat.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#81537 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
No one has attempted to unify all the branches of hard science and atheists like you get in the way of progression.
Wrong answer.

Unification of the sciences should not be necessary for a hypothesis of ID. And of course a hypothesis is the an early step in the formation of a theory.

But you probably do not know what either one is.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#81538 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
That's why there is no progress in the first place, because you atheists are a threat.
Right.

I didn't do my homework and it is all Jimmy's fault!

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81539 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>
you don't even know how to ask a proper question...
Either you don't understand the theory of evolution or you don't know how to respond well when confronted with a problem in the theory without personal attacks. What contribution do you have for being in the Darwinian cult? lol

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#81540 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
That's why there is no progress in the first place, because you atheists are a threat.
when in fact, it is the religious cult members that continually block scientific study and teaching.

please give some specific examples of atheists blocking any scientific studies in any field...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#81541 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Either you don't understand the theory of evolution or you don't know how to respond well when confronted with a problem in the theory without personal attacks. What contribution do you have for being in the Darwinian cult? lol
What problem was I confronted with? you asked a question with no frame of reference.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81542 Mar 18, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong answer.
Unification of the sciences should not be necessary for a hypothesis of ID. And of course a hypothesis is the an early step in the formation of a theory.
But you probably do not know what either one is.
How would you hypothesize evidence for intelligence for everything that exists when intelligence are exhibited in different ways that we now identify as different branches of science?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81543 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>What problem was I confronted with? you asked a question with no frame of reference.
You are dodging my question. You have nothing to offer at this point.
FREE SERVANT
#81544 Mar 18, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>then why is there not even a hypothesis of ID?
This thread would be a good place to present one. Oh wait, thare are how many regular readers here? ;)

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#81545 Mar 18, 2013
Cybele wrote:
Anyone knows why fish of different species evolve differently? Is this really evolution in action?
For example the Pacific leaping blenny has evolved into having complex social life out of water. Their way of finding a mate made them less dependent on water. Classic example of evolution.
But then I find another species, the electric fish mormyrids found in Africa that will only mate with those that produce the same electric signals and not with those that have different communication patterns. Researchers think that they are diverging into separate species. How so?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/...
did you miss this Woody?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Poll What are you thinking right now? (May '08) 3 min Enzo49 4,090
News What is up with that strange photo of President... 12 min Princess Finny Fe... 13
Denny Crain's Place (May '10) 14 min Crystal_Clear722 21,903
El's Kitchen (Feb '09) 18 min Princess Finny Fe... 75,303
A to Z songs by title or group! 21 min Scarbelly Bob 1,816
Words "with more than one meaning" (Sep '12) 22 min rainmaker2016 895
What's for dinner? (Feb '12) 28 min Fish_sticks 8,891
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 35 min CJ Rocker 217,219
More from around the web