Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216623 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Langoliers

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#79749 Mar 8, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>Another pointless post by Langy. And yes, I have been in the Soudan mine. It is cool in more ways than one.
No not pointless not at all.
Connect the dots.
I asked where did you live in the state.

I shed a bit of light in where in the state I spend time.

Pointless nope.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#79750 Mar 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
No not pointless not at all.
Connect the dots.
I asked where did you live in the state.
I shed a bit of light in where in the state I spend time.
Pointless nope.
So are you claiming that you came from "da range"?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#79751 Mar 8, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
Now i get the fudge...the concestor idea is what you do not get.
Like some others have the narrow definition of evolution as only reproduction and forget variation.
Or some here speaking "god bless", as if god was invented to bless stupidity.
EDEN-plain akkadian.
Wow. If I'm mistaken, then correct me. If we evolved from apes, then there was a real chewbacca sometime in the past, or do you prefer elite ape? lol

a dose of humor. everyone needs it.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#79752 Mar 8, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow. If I'm mistaken, then correct me. If we evolved from apes, then there was a real chewbacca sometime in the past, or do you prefer elite ape? lol
a dose of humor. everyone needs it.
We didn't evolve from apes.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#79753 Mar 8, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
We didn't evolve from apes.
I disagree. Our common ancestor with the chimpanzee would be called an ape today and we also are still classified as apes.

So I suppose you could say we did not evolve "from" apes since we still are apes.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#79754 Mar 8, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
We didn't evolve from apes.
They keep denying that - not knowing that they're the only ones claiming it.

Odd.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#79755 Mar 8, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree. Our common ancestor with the chimpanzee would be called an ape today and we also are still classified as apes.
So I suppose you could say we did not evolve "from" apes since we still are apes.
Okay, that.

Floccinaucinihilpilificator.

Or is that "...pilificatrix"?

Laffin.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#79756 Mar 8, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree. Our common ancestor with the chimpanzee would be called an ape today and we also are still classified as apes.
So I suppose you could say we did not evolve "from" apes since we still are apes.
Exactly. ;)

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#79757 Mar 8, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>They keep denying that - not knowing that they're the only ones claiming it.
Odd.
I know, it's so .... odd.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#79758 Mar 8, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
We didn't evolve from apes.
oh sorry, cats I suppose. ;-)

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#79759 Mar 8, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
oh sorry, cats I suppose. ;-)
Not that either, I think.
anonymous

Barberton, OH

#79760 Mar 8, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh so your beef is with Charles!
Well he can use some more flack...dûh
But not that anyone else noticed, given the way you implicate everybody.
Implicate everyone else in WHAT? Yer losin' it, mate!

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#79761 Mar 8, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Not that either, I think.
well I do know I evolved from a blue fish.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#79762 Mar 8, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
No, neither one has anything to do with evolution. In both there is more than enough time for evolution to occur.
It is known now how the universe could create itself without breaking any laws of physics.
whatever...if you tell me to think rationally and logically...and then tell me that the universe created itself virtually out of nothing...then your presenting a oxymoron.

I find that it's more than likely, on a psychological level that scientists have developed a hypothesis that supports the only view in which they can exclude any type of intelligence behind the process of the creation of the universe.

and why do I think this?...because scientists copy processes from the universe to advance their own knowledge, the same as if they had found an advanced alien space ship and incorporated into their own design....and then readily deny that any kind of intelligent exist behind these processes.So basically you have no problem acknowledging the space ship as an advanced concept...but at the same time you deny the obvious alien intelligence that is implied.
anonymous

Barberton, OH

#79763 Mar 8, 2013
MAAT wrote:
pg 3767
Anonymous wrote:
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
You prove my original point only too well. Today, you claim that homosexuality is "normal". Tomorrow, as your politics suits you, all sexual expression is "normal".
The real ongoing political problem is that gays can't exist in a majority straight community without eventual confrontation. Terms like "pansy" or "drama queen" or "gay" are often terms invented in the homosexual community that eventually attain different meaning in the straight community. Sometimes, there is a bit of a slur to it because the stereotype is typically one where inappropriately effeminate behavior is linked with homosexuality. Other times, terms like "fabulous" or "swag" aren't even starting off as announcements of sexual preference but end up sticking to the stereotype like glue.
One thing here is absolute. You're in a political forum. You were warned that you may encounter opinions that you disagree with, but this is an open discussion. In this realm, YOU started to personally label ME with a slur. YOU are playing the victim while refusing to come out of the closet. YOU are TRAPPED.
As I label it, while trying to avoid sounding like I'm saying "burn the witch!", you serve your master. You just couldn't stop yourself. Now you've exposed your agenda in entirety.
The good little Christians are here to burn ants with a magnifying glass just as much as you are. They're just too cowardly to name their demon.
I give people their chance to back out. Some will always engage in their holy war to the end. You've failed to be a good advocate for science. In some ways I'm glad to make that point. In other ways, I still have some work to do to expose the elitism and prejudice in your political community. Either way, you've failed big time. But feel free to hide behind Woodtick's deliberate ignorance and try to turn it into a popular hate speech you came here to create anyway.
Tsk! Tsk!
end copypaste.
You came in this forum after some political issues were discussed.
One thing you fail to realise is that this board is accessible from various topix nomers.
So while i'm discussing on the evo-forum (i'll admit that i can only repeat so often without getting bored, so i'll entertain discussions with others exploring other venues)you come in from a political angle.
Only when you medicalise homo-sexuality, that can only be done form a bigotted point of view and by denying epigenetics, you can make some points.
You are wrong in your assertions, and frankly started imposing your points of view on all posters here -half are gay: gay is pedophile etc-. And obviously lost sight of it being an intellectual exercise with some premisses and not a contest in ad hominem attacks on all.
It's not entertaining to talk to real life bigots.
You somehow don't notice obvious incompatibility of enlightened anti-bondslavery with concepts as innate badness caused by the fall.
They can't be upheld at the same time.
Pre-determination will always have you trying to medicalise the normal.(Which you than can complain about, as you did i.e. the cost for the tax-payers for medication.)While at the same time excluding predetermination for groups you want to exclude. They suddenly have free-choice.
So i's subjective venting.
imo you're arguements are rambling and illogical.
1. What's a "nomer"?
2. Something about ad-hominem but the rest isn't a structured argument in the English language.
3. There is a string of fancy terms you use that don't seem to make any sense in the English vernacular. Epigenetics, anti-bondslavery, pre-determination and probably several others that you have not posted as yet.
4. I'm doing my best to come up with empirical arguments for you to apply your logic to. It's not my fault that you decide to jump the tracks, take my rhetorical logic and attack me as if I personally advocate it. Are you familiar with the term "common sense"? If not, be so. You ARE on a mostly American forum.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#79764 Mar 8, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
whatever...if you tell me to think rationally and logically...and then tell me that the universe created itself virtually out of nothing...then your presenting a oxymoron.
I find that it's more than likely, on a psychological level that scientists have developed a hypothesis that supports the only view in which they can exclude any type of intelligence behind the process of the creation of the universe.
and why do I think this?...because scientists copy processes from the universe to advance their own knowledge, the same as if they had found an advanced alien space ship and incorporated into their own design....and then readily deny that any kind of intelligent exist behind these processes.So basically you have no problem acknowledging the space ship as an advanced concept...but at the same time you deny the obvious alien intelligence that is implied.
Watch and learn:

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#79765 Mar 8, 2013
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
Implicate everyone else in WHAT? Yer losin' it, mate!
Do recall your own post! Paraphrased:Half the people on these evo board are hidden homo-sexuals...blabla...not owning up etc.
Otherwise it's going entirely stupid.

As far as i'm concerned address your posts to Charles Idemi since that seemed to be the goal in the first place.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#79766 Mar 8, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
well I do know I evolved from a blue fish.
what? like a marlin?lol

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#79767 Mar 8, 2013
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
1. What's a "nomer"?
2. Something about ad-hominem but the rest isn't a structured argument in the English language.
3. There is a string of fancy terms you use that don't seem to make any sense in the English vernacular. Epigenetics, anti-bondslavery, pre-determination and probably several others that you have not posted as yet.
4. I'm doing my best to come up with empirical arguments for you to apply your logic to. It's not my fault that you decide to jump the tracks, take my rhetorical logic and attack me as if I personally advocate it. Are you familiar with the term "common sense"? If not, be so. You ARE on a mostly American forum.
Charles can answer that...talk to the hand.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#79768 Mar 8, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Watch and learn:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =0ZiXC8Yh4T0XX
nothing to learn...the universe creating itself from nothing is a very old buddhist/taoist concept.

tao te ching

{04} The Nature of the Way ...
The Way is a void,
Used but never filled:
An abyss it is,
From which all things come.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
***Keep a Word~Drop a Word*** (Jan '10) 1 min Bezeer 83,165
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 2 min Bezeer 22,154
Funny!! Word association game. (Nov '13) 3 min Bezeer 5,272
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 30 min wichita-rick 206,907
News Weird substance discovered in new A 5 notes - a... 1 hr Mila Beaujolais 33
2words into 2new words (May '12) 1 hr wichita-rick 6,759
News Museum to auction wax figures of presidents, fi... 1 hr Christsharian Col... 1
News Church fined $12,000 for helping homeless new 2 hr Knock off purse s... 40
News Trump's bizarre claim that the Clinton email co... 3 hr WasteWater 978
All Christmas Carols/Songs and Quotes.. 4 hr greymouser 43
More from around the web