Oh, and by the way. Let's consider an object lesson on the medical profession. Unless you think that ONLY DOCTORS ARE WORTHY OF JUDGING OTHER DOCTORS!!! Yeah. No elitism there!<quoted text>No, you are clearly bigoted. why all the talk of pansy and that rot?
Every serious medical person would disagree with your amatuer assesment of homosexuality.
Autism is labelled a disease by the medical profession, even though they really don't have a clue as to what causes it. In some cases, drugs, in others it's genetic. It's a symptom of brain damage, not a disease, yet doctors REGULARLY prescribe medicines to treat the symptoms, not cure them.
Here's your new ethical problem, since you ABHOR the linking of pedophilia to homosexuality!!! Why is Autism called a disease and NOT a form of free expression? What right does a doctor have to sedate one's natural (possibly evolved!) instincts to express a type of behavior that we CLEARLY are professionally stereotyping and NOT doing so in a bigoted manner?
Two ethical problems for the price of one! What makes one person a "professional" and another a bigot? What right does any individual have to restrain ANY behavior of another? By golly, THAT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL!! Except then, so is every law.