Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.
Comments
73,741 - 73,760 of 114,611 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78263
Mar 2, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Like most creatards you have no clue what evidence is.
As I said, even honest creationists will admit that the fossil record only supports the theory of evolution. There is no scientific evidence for creation. So incomplete or not, even a little evidence, and there is far more than a little in the fossil record, beats no evidence at all.
And of course the DNA record is overwhelming evidence that evolution occurred. ERV's are a slam dunk. The odds of us sharing the ERV's that we do with chimpanzees by nonevolutionary means is on the order of 1 out of 10^880,000.
I sometimes think they made some vow: "i confess my believe in jesus and will from this they on aspire to appear as stupid as possible. I promiss that from this they on no other knowedge but that from the mistranslated bible shall be taken into account'"

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78264
Mar 2, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>your bible calims many things we n=know are not true.
how could a human body live outside time and space? i guess humans don't have lungs?
again you are usiing your bible to prove that your bible is true. hardly logical and proven wrong so, so many times.
why would you enter a cult that you know has openly lied to you multiple times?
oh, that's right, it's a cult!
The bible has always been consistence...but how many times has science mis-lead the populace down through the ages...?

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78265
Mar 2, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
What I posted came from an atheist web page so I am sorry you don't agree with it. But as you pointed out earlier you're not a atheist but rather a theist.
If it is not relevant, then why did you post it as if it was?
Don't you read and think before posting?

My former post correction: they-day.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78266
Mar 2, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know that.
Kind of jumping to conclusions again.
Atheist sure to to love this line of thinking for they all seem to use it.
Absent of evidence is proof!
LOL
Ironically when it comes to the earth encompassing flood, it is.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78267
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Try doing some research "Moi"
Wrong, this was your claim, you have to do the research to back it up.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78268
Mar 2, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Adam was created with a full knowledge of language including the written word.
There was no need to evolve to a knowledge of language.
Literalism, instead of some linguistic theory, but soit:
Where do we read that adam can write?
And given the old magic believe - in this myth that was known and told in various forms in the Ancient Near East- expressed as naming is bringing to life, why do you assume language was of no consequence?

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78269
Mar 2, 2013
 
Well given the translation and filled in interpretation they miss all the play on words and various meanings anyway.
Knowledge of language and writing mattered a great deal, and was something to take pride in.
Everywhere in the axis-years (I put that from 800BC-300 BC).
And having your own law and written dialect, not only connected to your own god but also the land and people, proved to others your souvereignity and claim on the land.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78270
Mar 2, 2013
 
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
The bible has always been consistence...but how many times has science mis-lead the populace down through the ages...?
At core both have traditions.
But we all know that the translations are not the original and that the phiosophy has become unrecognizable.

But what was your point.
We need outsiders otherwise nothing could have happened.
Like meteors bringing amino-acids (even ones that are not natural here). I asked you why a composed mudball like earth would not have been capable of generating it's own amiono-acids and biochemistry suitable to it's gravity and place in the daisyflower zone. I can't recall ever receiving a reply/retort.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78271
Mar 2, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Claiming the fossil record as proof of evolution is a bit like claiming missing evidence is as good as real evidence.
I haven't read any book irttsat(in relation to the subject at hand) where it does not state SUPPORTS.
Supporting evidence should ring a bell.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78272
Mar 2, 2013
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>If it is not relevant, then why did you post it as if it was?
Don't you read and think before posting?

My former post correction: they-day.
I did not say it was not relevant. I said it came from an atheist web page that all.
Even atheist can be correct some times.

I can understand the mistake, most atheist stuff is not relevant.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78273
Mar 2, 2013
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>Ironically when it comes to the earth encompassing flood, it is.
However there is evidence all over the world for the flood.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78274
Mar 2, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong, this was your claim, you have to do the research to back it up.
Nope you're incorrect yet again.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78275
Mar 2, 2013
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>Literalism, instead of some linguistic theory, but soit:
Where do we read that adam can write?
And given the old magic believe - in this myth that was known and told in various forms in the Ancient Near East- expressed as naming is bringing to life, why do you assume language was of no consequence?
Again absents of evidence is not proof.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78276
Mar 2, 2013
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>I haven't read any book irttsat(in relation to the subject at hand) where it does not state SUPPORTS.
Supporting evidence should ring a bell.
"irttsat"

Should this not be "Irttsah" (in relation to the subject at hand)

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78277
Mar 2, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Again absents of evidence is not proof.
No, it isn't. Any assertion made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Since there is an absence of evidence, your claims about your god are dismissed, and any further assertions made by you are delusion.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78278
Mar 2, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong, this was your claim, you have to do the research to back it up.
No take my word for it or research it.

In case you thought you were on another planet I'll remind you this is earth and I'm not bound to you.
I stated a fact you don't believe me I posted some links you don't think are good enough so I say go prove me wrong. More then fare on this planet.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78279
Mar 2, 2013
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>Literalism, instead of some linguistic theory, but soit:
Where do we read that adam can write?
And given the old magic believe - in this myth that was known and told in various forms in the Ancient Near East- expressed as naming is bringing to life, why do you assume language was of no consequence?
Why do you assume God created a man who could talk to God who could name all animals who could talk to Eve and yet you believe he needed thousands of years to learn how to write.

Thats ridicules.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78280
Mar 2, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>No, it isn't. Any assertion made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Since there is an absence of evidence, your claims about your god are dismissed, and any further assertions made by you are delusion.
Oh ok

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

G'dansk

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78281
Mar 2, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
However there is evidence all over the world for the flood.
Show me your hard evidence for a flood and for Adam and Eve.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78282
Mar 2, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope you're incorrect yet again.
Yes, I do believe it was an idiotic creatard claim. What other idiot creatard could it have been? There is no reason someone who believed the theory of evolution would claim that a myth in the Bible is true.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••