Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Comments (Page 3,673)

Showing posts 73,441 - 73,460 of106,095
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77859
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Yankee Yahoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
Your sources show the scientific COMMUNITY supporting evolution.
Not the scientific method.
There is a huge difference.
Get it right, and quit playing games with me, King Kong.
Hey Dummy....

The "Scientific Method" cannot respond to your questions any more than "Science" can.

Therefore, the individuals that most USE the Scientific Method (Scientists) are the best resource to employ in responding to your concern about the support of the Theory of Evolution by Science.

Face it.
You painted yourself in a corner.
No escape.
You lost.

Putz.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77860
Feb 28, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Right!!!
Dream on.
Uh huh, and how much science do you deny?

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77861
Feb 28, 2013
 
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You got me wrong, but what i was trying to explain, was the evidence of a spirit, demons we all know are spirits, so, if we can dream, then there is a tendency that demons do exist.
Woodtick 57: Demons, we all know are myths. there is no logical reason to think that since animals dream there are spirits or demons. that really is 5th century thinking you doing, chuck.

Now he's quoting from the quraan or rather hadith...it get's weirder by the post.
pg 3679

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77862
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose_NoHo wrote:
Is this seriously an issue? I mean beyond a few fundies stirring up trouble. Creationism is clearly just a myth.
No. Creation is a fact. The bible is a myth. Use your head.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77863
Feb 28, 2013
 
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course I understand the point is do you actually understand I think not
You are making a statement based on bronze age mythology and expect everyone to bow down and worship goddidt because you do
Thousands of gods have been defeated, more by inaction than conquest, tell me how many people worship Ra now, or Aten or Thor, or Mbombo or Borr or Anu or Venus all forgotten except for archaeological curiosity, in the art world and some minor cults
How about Sheela na Gig, a common deity in the christian faith, to the extent that her image can be found in thousands of christian churches that you and just about every other christian knows fook all about, yet another forgotten and defeated god.
There are more than 3700+ named deities, many of them long gone from memory, yours is just one more. Faith (FAITH) F A I T H in that god is declining at an alarming rate. Ask your church leaders to tell you the truth (or look on the internet) and I believe you will be astounded by the rapid decline in christianity, assuming of course that you dont stick your head in the sand and you accept what your church leaders tell you
Yes and so are you going to end up adding nutrients to the earth as are we all. I have already explained this to you so why do you feel the need to threaten me with what is going to happen anyway?
Sheela-na-Gig as in before you could establish a church you needed permission from the local Lady, hence also the outspoken sexual imagery on churches. The womb is declared open.
They removed this imagery not so long ago, but about two generation have grown up entirely clueless of the tradition that no church could be built or established without the local mistress permission!

Christine if you have some interesting reading material then i'm a welcome receiver.

And it drives Langoliers with his holier than though, but don't know the bible really attitude, up the pole.;p

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77864
Feb 28, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh huh, and how much science do you deny?
How much do you know beyond Science?

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Topanga

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77865
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Yankee Yahoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Fool the public?
Good grief, man! No one is claiming a conspiracy theory here.
I just know for a fact that human nature easily corrupts the scientific method with bias and politics. And so, many theories have come and gone over the ages.
Like eugenics, and static-state theory.
It's not a conspiracy, silly, it's just new evidence or facts, or a lack thereof. Evolution simply has no scientific evidence, get over it. Why does the scientific community still support it after a 150 years of failing to find evidence?
That's what I'd like to know. Got any idea why billions of dollars and countless years of science is being wasted?
Perhaps you missed my earlier post... back one page I think. Here it is again:
Signs of recent evolution by natural selection are widespread across the human genome, experts say.
Genome researchers at the University of Chicago have identified more than 700 regions in human DNA where apparently strong selection has occurred, driving the spread of genes linked to a broad range of characteristics.
"These are very recent eventswithin the past ten thousand years," said Jonathan Pritchard, a geneticist whose laboratory team conducted the study.
The results suggest that humans in different regions have continued to adapt in numerous ways to both environmental changes and cultural innovations.
Full Article: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/...

Five Proofs of Evolution: http://www.evolutionfaq.com/articles/five-pro...
The Probability of Life: http://www.evolutionfaq.com/articles/probabil...

Lines of evidence: The science of evolution: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/arti...
National Academy of Sciences information on evolution:
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/ne...

Scientific proof is not a problem for evolution is has tremendous proof behind it. The problem is creotards constantly bickering about it and trying to convince the stupid people that its not true.

Lying for Jesus again...you people are so wrong and evil.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77866
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Creation is a fact. The bible is a myth. Use your head.
Uh, Cybele we are using all the heads that use the scientific method. That method is self-correcting and adds knowledge when properly applied.

(If they organize themselves in organizations does not mean that the organisation get's more or less sciency...who was the idiot with that argument.:[.

And just because we've not gotten around (or at least i have the intention) to nicely line up how we got from amino-acids to humans does not mean we have not figured it out.

Not even the hebrew bible states creation, nor does it give a timeline.
So we are up against church-father persecution and rammed down our throat interpretations.

Nasty.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77867
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
How much do you know beyond Science?
Enough, but this is a science debate right now.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77868
Feb 28, 2013
 
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
How much do you know beyond Science?
How do you define creation?
If not the bible, if not some outerworld intelligence.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77869
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you missed my earlier post... back one page I think. Here it is again:
Signs of recent evolution by natural selection are widespread across the human genome, experts say.
Genome researchers at the University of Chicago have identified more than 700 regions in human DNA where apparently strong selection has occurred, driving the spread of genes linked to a broad range of characteristics.
"These are very recent eventswithin the past ten thousand years," said Jonathan Pritchard, a geneticist whose laboratory team conducted the study.
The results suggest that humans in different regions have continued to adapt in numerous ways to both environmental changes and cultural innovations.
Full Article: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/...
Five Proofs of Evolution: http://www.evolutionfaq.com/articles/five-pro...
The Probability of Life: http://www.evolutionfaq.com/articles/probabil...
Lines of evidence: The science of evolution: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/arti...
National Academy of Sciences information on evolution:
http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/ne...
Scientific proof is not a problem for evolution is has tremendous proof behind it. The problem is creotards constantly bickering about it and trying to convince the stupid people that its not true.
Lying for Jesus again...you people are so wrong and evil.
Who ever said natural selection is not a fact? It is. What you don't have is DNA proof of how one species evolved into another. But you evolutionists are so predictable. You're going to giver reference to all kinds of fossil records which is rare. How do you explain the evolution of flowers and bees and the process of pollination?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77870
Feb 28, 2013
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you define creation?
If not the bible, if not some outerworld intelligence.
MAAT, reproduction is a form of creation. Invention of tools is a form of creation. It's just a logical explanation for existence of the universe. Natural process is not excuse for these evolutionists that we were not created because sex that leads to reproduction is also a natural process.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77871
Feb 28, 2013
 
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Who ever said natural selection is not a fact? It is. What you don't have is DNA proof of how one species evolved into another. But you evolutionists are so predictable. You're going to giver reference to all kinds of fossil records which is rare. How do you explain the evolution of flowers and bees and the process of pollination?
But we do! Fossils are rare in any case.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77872
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The story of Adam and Eve is just sex ed for all of you unless you want monkey porn.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77873
Feb 28, 2013
 
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
MAAT, reproduction is a form of creation. Invention of tools is a form of creation. It's just a logical explanation for existence of the universe. Natural process is not excuse for these evolutionists that we were not created because sex that leads to reproduction is also a natural process.
In the racism line i just made a distinction between sexual evoluton and natural evolution.
Choice does make a difference phenotypically.
With some allelic changes that make the changes hardwired, but that is a relatively young process.

So we are back to semantics.
Best not too since some lines are clearly drawn.
Creation usually entail a outside influence to get it going and for some silly reason the notion that it was all done for the superior GDIWM-crowd.(same lot, never mind the religious adherence, on these fora)

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77874
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
In the racism line i just made a distinction between sexual evoluton and natural evolution.
Choice does make a difference phenotypically.
With some allelic changes that make the changes hardwired, but that is a relatively young process.
So we are back to semantics.
Best not too since some lines are clearly drawn.
Creation usually entail a outside influence to get it going and for some silly reason the notion that it was all done for the superior GDIWM-crowd.(same lot, never mind the religious adherence, on these fora)
I might as well kiss a frog and wait for it to turn into a prince in a thousand years. Wow evolutionist's biggest fairy tale.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77875
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Who ever said natural selection is not a fact? It is. What you don't have is DNA proof of how one species evolved into another. But you evolutionists are so predictable. You're going to giver reference to all kinds of fossil records which is rare. How do you explain the evolution of flowers and bees and the process of pollination?
Actually we do. And your language is sloppy. Once in a clade a species is always in a clade. What you meant to say is that we have no evidence that different species share a common ancestor. And we have plenty of evidence of that. The nested hierarchy of ERV's is a slam dunk for evolution. Here check this out:http://www.pnas.org/conten t/96/18/10254.full

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77876
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually we do. And your language is sloppy. Once in a clade a species is always in a clade. What you meant to say is that we have no evidence that different species share a common ancestor. And we have plenty of evidence of that. The nested hierarchy of ERV's is a slam dunk for evolution. Here check this out:http://www.pnas.org/conten t/96/18/10254.full
your link doesn't work. Just like your theory of evolution. You scientists better think of a more sound theory for the similarities of DNA in all species that inhabit the same planet. Got a clue? Oh it's in the environment.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77877
Feb 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

psst...Permutation as oppose to mutation. Do that math instead of made up fairy tales.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77878
Feb 28, 2013
 

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 73,441 - 73,460 of106,095
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

212 Users are viewing the Weird Forum right now

Search the Weird Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 5 min Tom2Tone 132,021
Lets Ask Billy R! (May '12) 11 min AHarleyhoney 2,286
The Night Owl Saloon (Jun '11) 11 min tallyho 15,337
How Long Have You Won in "Last Post Wins" thread? (Jan '09) 12 min Hey Its Emma 6,550
For Dear FlowerChild (Dec '07) 17 min Hey Its Emma 23,472
last word - first (Jun '12) 22 min Nobody 2 Special 6,670
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 24 min Jennifer Renee 4,449
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 1 hr buck 11,727
High school student in hot water after asking M... 2 hr Marley 4
•••
•••
•••
•••