Evolution vs. Creation

[woodtick57]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Neither aliens or the moonlanding are impossible.
It's just we only have evidence of one.
Remember you cannot judge other people's intelligence because:
1 - You're human and pointed out the alien's methods are beyond human comprehension.
2 - You're an alien involved in a conspiracy to manipulate humans and you've blown your cover.
Makes no odds to me which dumb you pick.(shrug)

alien outlaw got a new moniker! how exciting!

[FREE SERVANT]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Five is right out!

A pattern is shown.....

[Cybele]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>I know it exists. your mystery prime matter is what is in question. has anyone detected it yet? anything that suggests it exists at all?

So you don't think the hydrogen atom can't be broken down into particles?

Maybe you need to watch it again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[FREE SERVANT]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>I know it exists. your mystery prime matter is what is in question. has anyone detected it yet? anything that suggests it exists at all?

Too much money is being spent on such.

[woodtick57]

FREE SERVANT wrote:

<quoted text>A pattern is shown.....

Big whoop. we got tons of them. we give em away as schwag at company parties and county fairs...

[woodtick57]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
So you don't think the hydrogen atom can't be broken down into particles?
Maybe you need to watch it again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

yes it can. a proton and an electron. no prime matter found yet,a s far as i know, or you it seems...

[Cybele]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Why do you continually attribute to me things i never even came close to implying?
is that your only form of debate?

Ok here.

HYDROGEN = 1 proton + 1 electron, 0 neutrons

prime matter was split into a negative and positive charge particles, one repelled, one attracted

the positive charge attracted prime matter particles

1 proton = 918 prime matter particles
(which is 1838 the electron weight)

HYDROGEN = PRIME MATTER

[woodtick57]

FREE SERVANT wrote:

<quoted text>Too much money is being spent on such.

money is being spent on finding prime matter? where?

[FREE SERVANT]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Big whoop. we got tons of them. we give em away as schwag at company parties and county fairs...

TOOOOO funny!

[MAAT]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Why do you continually attribute to me things i never even came close to implying?
is that your only form of debate?

Well that adam with hs video, though nice animation was a bit of in his suggestion.
But i would not really know what else could figure as primal matter?
I could talk about geons as quantum blackholes that repell gravity.;)(Since at quantum scale it would be turned around) 1021 TeV thereabouts. I would not have a clue how to find them, but they would be candidates for dark matter a.o.
But also function as space-time builders.
So all it is is theory and mountains of papers to read.
So good 'ol hydrogen uh PROTIUM beats it any day.

[macumazahn]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Three is the number thou shalt count, and the number that shalt count will be three!!!

"Five!"

"Three, Sire!"

"Three!"

[MAAT]

What would be freaky is if and some part of SUSY and stringtheory where out because of the higgs-boson, as some suggest.
And maybe we are still missing something alltogehter.

So...how many planets did those aliens burn to get here?

[Cybele]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>yes it can. a proton and an electron. no prime matter found yet,a s far as i know, or you it seems...

It just shows you how hydrogen was formed. Has anyone found quarks? So how did scientists find the top quark on the higgs-boson?

[MAAT]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>money is being spent on finding prime matter? where?

At the local gazz station to fill up on hydrogen.

[Langoliers]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Most recent polls show the number of non-believers in the US to be far far higher than 2%...

The United States of America Central Intelligent's Agency says that the population of the worlds ATHEIST is at 2.04%. Almost non-existent.

I'll take their word for it.

[woodtick57]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
It just shows you how hydrogen was formed. Has anyone found quarks? So how did scientists find the top quark on the higgs-boson?

We know quarks exist by measuring their electric charge.

sorry charlie....

where is this supposed prime matter again? why can't you answer this simple quetion?

[woodtick57]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok here.
HYDROGEN = 1 proton + 1 electron, 0 neutrons
prime matter was split into a negative and positive charge particles, one repelled, one attracted
the positive charge attracted prime matter particles
1 proton = 918 prime matter particles
(which is 1838 the electron weight)
HYDROGEN = PRIME MATTER

No, some theory states that hydrogen has prime matter in it. no proof of it anywhere that you can find...

[woodtick57]

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
The United States of America Central Intelligent's Agency says that the population of the worlds ATHEIST is at 2.04%. Almost non-existent.
I'll take their word for it.

Most people that are free thinkers or nonbelievers don't call themselves atheist, much like I have been telling you for years.

i would never answer a poll saying i was an ateist because i am not one.

[Langoliers]

Subduction Zone wrote:

<quoted text>Most don't. Most are like me and demand evidence.

Do you have any? No.

This was in response to:

"Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And does not changes the evidence of a God? NO!
There are many physicist that believes in the existence of God. "

who="Subduction Zone"]<quoted text>Most don't. Most are like me and demand evidence.

Do you have any? No.

I then responded to you with this:
"Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmm. SZ babbling BS again. Go figure.

"According to a survey of members of the American Assn. for the Advancement of Science, conducted by the Pew Research Center in May and June this year, a majority of scientists (51%) say they believe in God or a higher power, while 41% say they do not."

I hope this clears the fog in your head a bit.

[MAAT]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
It just shows you how hydrogen was formed. Has anyone found quarks? So how did scientists find the top quark on the higgs-boson?

I'll say read along.
Freeservant too as to the spin-off of what he calles waisted money.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
New bosons discovered.
'Top' and 'quark' i did however not pay attention too, today.