Explain 'real science?' Well it is derived from observable, verifiable, and testable facts.<quoted text>
liked the reply by macuzuhma.
But i think 'real' science (maybe you care to explain that term cybele) should be left to scientist and this kind of dawdling of acceptance is not to be incouraged for they are bound to get things wrong. Be it intentionally misrepresenting or not.
resting light particle??
Or what a higgs-boson particle actually is.
You're right. They could be wrong. You be the judge. Do you have a better theory?