No it isn't. That's why plenty of religious people are scientists.<quoted text>
Science is an ideology, that for the most part is anti-religion...
In fact we've pointed this out to you months ago.
The fact you're repeating this lie means you're a liar.
If science is mere "religious ideology" then stop taking medicine, stop using your computer, stop going to the shops, using your car, anything. Go back to living in the woods and go hunt for your own chickens.
You won't because you're a hypocrite.
Actually there are more than two ways. Here's some more:There are really only two ways to look at the creation of the Universe...either it is the result of a inconceivable intelligence ...or it somehow magically manifested itself out of nothing?
So which is more rational?
1 - The universe has always been here in some form or another.
2 - The universe manifested itself by NON-magical means.
3 - The universe manifested itself by a CONCEIVABLE intelligent agent, such as (a) God or Gods.
Rather amusing that in one post you're claiming that there's conceivable scientific evidence for the intelligent creation of the universe and in the very next post you're arguing that it's INconceivable.
If it's INconceivable then you have no case. Because you cannot conceive of it. QED.
In my humble opinion? If such an entity exists, this thing creates entire universes in its spare time as a hobby. There is NO WAY humans are gonna have a hope in hell of comprehending such an entity.
Fundamentalist ego presumes otherwise. And not only that, but that said entity made the entire thing just for them.