And let's try something here, Boo boo.<quoted text>
Lame jokes? your position on lifes origins is far funnier than anyone could be, and your dodging of it is insulting.
Observation that life is made up of chemistry? Observable fact.
Observation that new life develops from naturally occurring chemical processes? Observable fact.
Observation of life? Observable fact.
Observation of evolution? Observable fact.
Observation of magical poofing of organisms by invisible Jewish wizards? SWEET F A.
Hypothesis - magical poofing of life due to the intervention of an interdimensional invisible Jewish wizard. Scientific observations to support this include... well, uh... SWEET F A. Currently undergoing scientific research by... absolutely positively NO-ONE on the entire frakking planet.
Hypothesis - Abiogenesis is the result of God making use of naturally occurring chemical processes from the abundance of chemicals present in the Earths early environment. Observations to support this include planet-wide chemistry as well as the earliest forms of organisms being bacterial/micriobial in nature, the reproduction of which gradually led to a great variety of lifeforms with no violations of nested hierarchy. However unfortunately there is no testable evidence of (a) God. Currently being researched by numerous scientific organizations across the world, except for the bit about God since it is not currently scientifically verifiable. The rest is though.
Now, note that these are two DISTINCTLY THEIST points of view regarding the origin of life on this planet.
Also note that only ONE of these positions does not necessarily require a denial of reality.
Care to take a guess which one that would be?