Evolution vs. Creation

[Charles Idemi]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>used to be everyone pretty much 'believed' in religion. you had to or you were ostracized or outright killed. it takes a while for such worldwide cultural conformities to die out. the # of people moving away from these ridiculous myths is growing at a huge rate.

And yet atheism are still in the minority.
What a farce!

[xxxooxxx]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>there has yet to be a video of a UFO, or a ghost, or any such thing that waan't proven fake.
there are videos or photos out there of fuzzy things, but that is not proof of anything.
summation... no proof of those things.

There was quite of few actually, that they said that they could not prove where fake.

Including sightings by USAF pilots.(just to name one)

[woodtick57]

xxxooxxx wrote:

<quoted text>
Your exactly right.

Actually, nothing about his post was correct. not one thing.

[Charles Idemi]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>No, it was some guy pounding on my heart...
i'm sure almost dying was very scary for you, and it was provbably a life changing event, it usually is. but oit was just your brain, not a supernatural being communicating with you.. why doesn't god communicate with you now, and if you think he does, again, you need counseling...

God has always been there for me.
You are the one that needs counseling.
He has delivered me from accidents, attacks and many more.
You will understand that one day.

[woodtick57]

KandaDogon wrote:

If you want know if there is creation or evolution,please read the english traduction of the Quran,I dont want arguments, just do it!

how is amyth going to help this discussion. we already have the bible freaks here and that is the same god myth...

[woodtick57]

KandaDogon wrote:

If you want know if there is creation or evolution,please read the english traduction of the Quran,I dont want arguments, just do it!

why didn't Mohammed , or his friends, write down the prophecies while he was alive? whya re all these supposed prophets anly written about after they die and a religious movement needs people to elieve they had the word of god?

this is a repeating theme in all religious myths...

Hmmm...

[MAAT]

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
This is true also. From what I've heard.
"A virus is not considered alive. Technically."

The part about playing dead also.
I know, it sounds like a joke.

[xxxooxxx]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Actually, nothing about his post was correct. not one thing.

I disagree...I made the same point myself in so many words...you may cite things from a political view...but I have no political view on the matter.

[Charles Idemi]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>if only there were the teensiest shred of proof of that...
just one teensy shred...
just one...
In all the millenia of mankind just one...

The evidence of God's existence are all around us.
The universe, the elements and other property(ies), just don't came on its own but through a creator, since it was never humans handiwork.

[MAAT]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Actually, nothing about his post was correct. not one thing.

You could even do the game: count the fallacies.

[woodtick57]

Charles Idemi wrote:

<quoted text> The evidence of God's existence are all around us.
The universe, the elements and other property(ies), just don't came on its own but through a creator, since it was never humans handiwork.

that is not evidence of any god, gods or goddesses.

how many times are you going to proint that lie?

when "god" brought you back, did he tell you to lie incessantly?(that does sound like the god of the bible...lie lie, lie..)

[woodtick57]

xxxooxxx wrote:

<quoted text>
I disagree...I made the same point myself in so many words...you may cite things from a political view...but I have no political view on the matter.

Nothing political about it, the entire statement is factually incorrect. actually, you would be hard pressed to find one perfect thing.

[woodtick57]

MAAT wrote:

<quoted text>
You could even do the game: count the fallacies.

if this were a drinking game iwloud b to sottally wasted....

[woodtick57]

Charles Idemi wrote:

<quoted text> God has always been there for me.
You are the one that needs counseling.
He has delivered me from accidents, attacks and many more.
You will understand that one day.

No, no he hasn't. you are delusional.

seriously if you brought these thoughts to any credible psychologist, he would think you are mentally ill.

[xxxooxxx]

Intrinsic intelligent processes of the Universe are quite observable and testable...

[MAAT]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>I'm sorry...were you one of those crop circle believer freaks?
that's gotta be a sore spot huh...bad luck ol' mum...

FGS, what's the guy on...at least a few pints.

Cropcircles can occur naturally. Wind a moisture-driven system.
Since we have that definition it might also be easier to explain such sometimes very localised small events, also smaller in circumference.

For the other method you take a wooden board with ropes on each side, and with one foot you stamp/press the board on the grain, lift...stamp...lift...

We should have the option t automatically post:
Warning, this post contains irony/ a joke.

I posted a joke on the other forum. Another fundie judged it with a clueless. That's funny actually if it wouldn't be so sad.

[woodtick57]

xxxooxxx wrote:

Intrinsic intelligent processes of the Universe are quite observable and testable...

No. no they ae not... you will not be able to find even one.

[MAAT]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>if this were a drinking game iwloud b to sottally wasted....

:)) I was thinking the same when i posted that.

Considering i rarely drink. We would need extended breaks.

[Charles Idemi]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>that is not evidence of any god, gods or goddesses.
how many times are you going to proint that lie?
when "god" brought you back, did he tell you to lie incessantly?(that does sound like the god of the bible...lie lie, lie..)

So, answer the question, what brought the universe into form?

[xxxooxxx]

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Nothing political about it, the entire statement is factually incorrect. actually, you would be hard pressed to find one perfect thing.

Perfection is strictly a subjective, relative term.