Evolution vs. Creation

Full story: Best of New Orleans

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Comments (Page 3,491)

Showing posts 69,801 - 69,820 of106,046
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74099
Feb 6, 2013
 
Yankee Yahoo wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I stated that it is the nature of the FLU to change itself. It still remains the same flu. It's NATURE does not change at all.
Biology proves beyond that the shadow of any doubt that all life fiercely resists change, which is why DNA is the backbone of life. It is precisely the LACK of change that makes the evolutionary model impossible.
Life resists change too much to make it work.
Yet another example of how you demonstrate you have no idea what you are talking about.
Give me some examp;les of this "life resists change' theory of yours...

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74100
Feb 6, 2013
 
xxxooxxx wrote:
theory
/&#712;TH&#275;&#6 01;r&#275;/
Noun
A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, esp. one based on general principles independent of the thing to be...: "Darwin's theory of evolution"
supposition
/&#716;s&#601;p&#6 01;&#712;ziSH&#601;n/
Noun
An uncertain belief.
Synonyms
assumption - presumption - surmise - guess - conjecture
by definition, a theory in not fact... as some on here would have you believe.
And some like me have wondered since the beginning of this thread what was up with the use of that word 'theory'.
Evolution is, as far as i'm concerned.
Theorizing as to it's exact function, or having to teach the broad outlay might however get that qualification.
And that is just because it is nye impossible to cover al the details and all the progress.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Topanga

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74101
Feb 6, 2013
 
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Right. But do you ever wonder why the first civilizations did not occur until about 10,000 BC? Why is that?
Well I have a fairly good idea. In the early days I would bet that the hominids would have a very high rate of infant mortality. We do know that the peoples of around 10,000 years ago had a hard time just replacing themselves (having 2 children that lived).

Also, they were starting from scratch in everything. They had no accumulated knowledge from which to draw. No language to enable them to pass along vital information and knowledge. A scratch could kill them from sepsis because they didn't know the germ theory.

It has been estimated from the bones found that many many of them didn't live past 18-25 years old. That in itself is an impediment to passing along knowledge. For a long time they had no effective weapons to use against wild animals. In Africa, where we came from , there are many things that can kill you.

Then for the longest time we were hunter-gatherers and didn't stay in one place very long...we followed the food. It is only after many people realized we could grow lots of food if we stayed in one place that civilizations/cities started forming.

Another thing to consider is that there were several natural 'disasters' that wiped out lots of the world-wide populations occasionally. Ice ages, volcanoes....those kind of things. 75,000 years ago, when Mount Toba in Sumatra/Malaysia exploded, it may have brought population down to less than 10-20 thousand people.

The US government census bureau has estimated that world population around the time farming commenced in the middle east was 10-20 million people world-wide. All continents (except Antarctica) were populated by this time.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74102
Feb 6, 2013
 
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
Brainwash with modification.
As far as i understood he and is merry gang were living of older well to do widows.
If you want to call that being the diciple of the master, i think you have a warped sense of reality.
The New Testament is propaganda written decades after his death by people with various political agendas. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the real Jesus or his life.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74103
Feb 6, 2013
 
MADRONE wrote:
<quoted text>
Then Evolution it is. See how simple?
Laffin.

Yah.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74104
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Science as a belief system utterly fails because it's basic foundation, is one of doubt. There's always a possibility that any given theorem, can be completely over turned or reversed.

hypothesis= this is the way it could be.

Theory= this is the way it seems to be.

Intrinsic intelligent processes exhibited by the Universe?...100% observable and testable phenomena.

Level 1

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74105
Feb 6, 2013
 
God

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74106
Feb 6, 2013
 
Yankee Yahoo wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no such fossil record that supports this. The fossil records do not support evolution at all, or any such transitional period between species.
You are just regurgitating what someone told you at this point. I bet you don't have the faintest idea what the model of evolution actual is, do you?
Blind faith?
Unfortunately, this is probably how religions actual start. Blind followers of something they think is absolutely true.
Sad, really, that science is being destroyed from within.
Bloody Norah, you really are that ignorant, aren't you?

NEWS FLASH:

The geological column absolutely proves the age of the Earth.

The fossil-record sequence absolutely proves evolution.

(Do NOT start blathering about abiogenesis - that's a whole different matter!)

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74107
Feb 6, 2013
 
xxxooxxx wrote:
Science as a belief system utterly fails because it's basic foundation, is one of doubt. There's always a possibility that any given theorem, can be completely over turned or reversed.
hypothesis= this is the way it could be.
Theory= this is the way it seems to be.
Intrinsic intelligent processes exhibited by the Universe?...100% observable and testable phenomena.
Your description of what a scientific theory is is not correct. one needs corroborating evidence to make a theory. a scientific theory must predict future observations and those must be upheld or the thoery must be altered or thrown out.

why would you try to debunk the scientific method when you don't even understan what it si our how it works?

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74108
Feb 6, 2013
 
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
The New Testament is propaganda written decades after his death by people with various political agendas. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the real Jesus or his life.
I fail to see how...

&#9668; Matthew 5:44

"But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;"

....would support anyone's political agenda.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Topanga

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74109
Feb 6, 2013
 
Yankee Yahoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, there is no way to know that, if humans are 200,000 years old (or is it 400,000, it keeps changing.)
Ever see any of the World Without Us shows? We now know that almost no evidence of any advanced civilization would endure past a few thousands years. And things like the pyramids are only a tiny fraction of the total sum of structures built.
Skyscrapers would not last past a 1000 years, cars and their engines no more than 50 to a 100 years, etc, etc. All traces would be gone, period.
Nature is a very harsh recycler.
It has been 200,000 years or less for a very long time. And we know that signs of civilizations last a long time. Not long ago a major archaeological find in Turkey (Gbekli Tepe) was dated to 11,000 years ago. Very many archaeological sites all over the world are over 10,000 years old.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74110
Feb 6, 2013
 
Yankee Yahoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
It relies on millions of years, as matter of math. The current measurable changes in any species by mutation, and by mutations that survive to the next generation to bring a positive change that enhances survive and natural selection, takes not only MILLIONS OF YEARS, but BILLIONS.
The math does not lie.
But you do.
The buildingblocks took a long time to make. Then the earth.
To get things started took a god billion years. But once you have a tried and tested form. It will be repeated and added too. And than evolution takes of exponentionally.
The wheel needs not inventing every generation.
Or some gods that have to keep it steady:"...whoooh guys...easy does it...add a bit of histione their....keep that codon in place...HOLD THAT ASTEROID!

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74111
Feb 6, 2013
 
typo X)) god-good

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74112
Feb 6, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Your description of what a scientific theory is is not correct. one needs corroborating evidence to make a theory. a scientific theory must predict future observations and those must be upheld or the thoery must be altered or thrown out.
why would you try to debunk the scientific method when you don't even understan what it si our how it works?
If a theory was 100% certain, then it would be a fact and not a theory.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74113
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
I fail to see how...

&#9668; Matthew 5:44

"But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;"

....would support anyone's political agenda.
Not national politics. The gospels were written by men trying to influence the church into going certain ways... so they made up things and put them into the mouth of Jesus.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74114
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

xxxooxxx wrote:
Science as a belief system utterly fails because it's basic foundation, is one of doubt. There's always a possibility that any given theorem, can be completely over turned or reversed.

hypothesis= this is the way it could be.

Theory= this is the way it seems to be.

Intrinsic intelligent processes exhibited by the Universe?...100% observable and testable phenomena.
Science is not a belief system. It is a study through observation of the intrinsic intelligent processes exhibited by the universe.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74115
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
If a theory was 100% certain, then it would be a fact and not a theory.
Not really. It would still be a theory because of alternative ideas about how it works.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74116
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
I fail to see how...
&#9668; Matthew 5:44
"But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;"
....would support anyone's political agenda.
Wellm the historical backround changes as to different opposition to christianity was at the time of that particular gospel's writing.

yes, they were in fact propoganda, billboards if you will for their particular sect of believers...

If they were true memoirs fo jesus's time, the historical backround would not have changed.

for one example, look at how the Pharisees are mentioned from teh earlier gospels to the later ones...in the earlier ones, they wer not that powerful or as much of a threat to jesus and his sect,as that was the fact at the time of that gospels writing. in later gospels the Pharisees are very powerful and very much a threat, as that was the truth at the time of that gospel's writing.

check out Isaac osomov's secular look at the new teatament for further examples of such and a great secular look at the facts in the bible...

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Topanga

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74117
Feb 6, 2013
 
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
If a theory was 100% certain, then it would be a fact and not a theory.
Woodtick57 is right, you don't understand science at all or you wouldn't have said what you just did...go back to school dummy

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74118
Feb 6, 2013
 
Isaac Asimov's secular look at the new testament....

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 69,801 - 69,820 of106,046
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••