Evolution vs. Creation

[Charles Idemi]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Not Microsoft?
:-/

Microsoft is man made, yes or no?
Even the founder knows that there is God.

[Cybele]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>What claims have I made?

That you are asexual. No biology can prove humans are asexual.

[nanoanomaly]

Charles Idemi wrote:

<quoted text> Narrow!
Some Budhist sect even see him as a god.

Anybody who believes in Karma believes in the supernatural.

[Charles Idemi]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Why are you asking for what has already been presented numerous times which you will reject anyway no matter how much evidence there is anyway?
In short, why are you so dishonest?
And to point out AGAIN for the monumentally stupid people with extreme memory problems, the theory of evolution makes NO theological claims. It does NOT say whether or not (a) God was involved. Hence why both atheists and Christians accept evolution.

You are the dishonest one here. No evidence to date, disproving God.
All christians worldwide will never agree with you that, God does not exist.

[alan]

Charles Idemi wrote:

<quoted text> The bible is real due to the fact that, archaeology has confirmed most of its stories.
We are not talking about the koran but the bible.
Next?

Next? archaeology has confirmed? Humans have ways of making everything seem real.A few thousand years of props and story telling, rewriting, editing sure makes a story seem real. CI think, religion is a business. The Pope is living the high life. It all started with an advanced alien being with a sense of humor. He wanted to see how far the "Ascension" would go with the simple minded humans. Bingo! It turned into the "Bible". Add, pictures, stories of fantasy, fables of many and its history. Not real, just a story made real by its believers.Let us know when this God character becomes real.

[Charles Idemi]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
We understood the grammar. We don't understand illogical arguments.

Likewise.
No logical evidence from you or any one disproving the existence of a God.

[Charles Idemi]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
You're forgetting to take into account that Chuck in particular is not quite sane.

Likewise.

[Charles Idemi]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not ruled out. At all. Never has been. All you require is evidence. You don't have it.

Evidence?
To date, none of you have it.
I do not subscribe to guesses and projections.

[Charles Idemi]

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>You are insane.

Ofcourse. We have so many of them here.

[Charles Idemi]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes. Particle/anti-particle pairs in a vacuum.
Keep in mind the hypocrisy of you using this argument. You demand everything "must" have a cause, except your proposal which has special exemption. I dispute that assertion.

Good!
Now tell me what brought about the particle?
Or simply, how did the particle came? What brought it?

[nanoanomaly]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
That you are asexual. No biology can prove humans are asexual.

He says he's asexual but rants on about gay rights and drools over Brian Cox, posting that he thinks Brian is "dreamy". I think we all know what KK means by dreamy, don't we?

[Charles Idemi]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Cats have kittens therefore God exists?
Can't beat that.

I am using logic. If cats and other mammals can give birth or create their kind, they must definitely have a creator( the Genesis).

[Charles Idemi]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>
Since you have provided no evidence, none contradicting your assertions is required. Your assertions are thereby dismissed as mythology.

Likewise.

[KittenKoder]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
You keep telling me that I don't have evidence that you are what I think you are. Now you are just lying. You are an incorrigible liar. Please refrain from using arguments when you are just doing the same.

No, I keep asking for evidence and none has been presented so I am rightfully assuming you have none.

[phaines]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
That you are asexual. No biology can prove humans are asexual.

do you know what asexual means??
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Do_earthworms_repro...

[KittenKoder]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
That you are asexual. No biology can prove humans are asexual.

Biologically there can be asexuals, and the trait is not isolated but is likely genetic. I made no assertions regarding how or why, but I am asexual. Meh, I fail to see how the why or how is important to a layperson such as yourself.

[alan]

Charles Idemi wrote:

<quoted text>Microsoft is man made, yes or no?
Even the founder knows that there is God.

There is a God? No, CL they are the Gods of your worst daymare. The God of the Bible story(fantasy) and the Gods of the cosmos(real) are very different. When you see God and all his cronies get some pics and tell the world he has risen!

[Charles Idemi]

KittenKoder wrote:

<quoted text>
So you're saying that all the fossils and DNA is part of some grand conspiracy?
Cookoo.

Sound like the bird.
Evolution like i said actually means change or metamorphosis, but evolution from non-human to human, is a farce...

[Cybele]

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>He says he's asexual but rants on about gay rights and drools over Brian Cox, posting that he thinks Brian is "dreamy". I think we all know what KK means by dreamy, don't we?

Cox? lol

[KittenKoder]

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>He says he's asexual but rants on about gay rights and drools over Brian Cox, posting that he thinks Brian is "dreamy". I think we all know what KK means by dreamy, don't we?

Um, there you go with your assertion. Still waiting for the evidence of your assertion. As to your gay rights problem, lots of family people are fighting for equality for gay people as well, are you saying they're all gay now? Pulling a fallacy of equivocation is not a wise move, sir, because it demonstrates that you are looking for an excuse to hate, which is not surprising considering you are religious and that is a common trait of religious people.

All your "evidence" is nothing more than personal projection and fallacies.