Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#72655 Jan 27, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Yah, don't flatter yourself. Just stop lying to yourself because no one else can save you. SEE YA!
I don't need saving, but those close to you should be worried for their own safety.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#72656 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Buddha is not worshipped. He is a guide, not a deity.
https://www.google.com/search...

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#72657 Jan 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>Nope. No one's existence is self evident, because that's not how evidence works.
Did you ever hear of

I think therefore I am?

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#72658 Jan 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Then what do you call those of us who have no desire or sexual attraction?
Asexual is what scientists call it, often it's paired with an aversion to sex of any sort. It is a genetic trait, a fallback to the original traits in the animal kingdom since asexual reproduction is the most common and oldest form or reproduction the trait is ingrained into every animal's DNA, and it's not difficult to comprehend why it would appear in even species that reproduce sexually. Your denial of these facts demonstrates that you are a pervert who just wants everyone to be like you, so much that you are willing to deny reality itself.
Fantasizing about Brian is not asexual behavior.

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#72659 Jan 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have sexual fantasies at all.
...
Liar. You, wearing a dress, proves otherwise.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#72660 Jan 27, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you ever hear of
I think therefore I am?
Which was a philosophical colloquial ... nothing more. It proves nothing but it does assume that self awareness is attributed to intellect, which we know is a false equivocation.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#72661 Jan 27, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Fantasizing about Brian is not asexual behavior.
Wow, so you fantasize about everyone who interests you? You're more of a pervert than I had originally thought.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#72662 Jan 27, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Liar. You, wearing a dress, proves otherwise.
Wow, another of your perversions brought to light. So clothing is a sexual thing to you as well? Is there anything that you don't find sexual? I worry about the people around you now.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72663 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72664 Jan 27, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you ever hear of
I think therefore I am?
Yup. Doesn't apply to creationists.

(evil grin)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72665 Jan 27, 2013
Pete wrote:
<quoted text>Hell yeah!
I see you're intent on misquoting me. Have I upset you?

Good.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72666 Jan 27, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Nope! I know someone who can set us free and we will be free indeed.
Free to worship him in heaven or burn in hell? You have a strange notion of "freedom" Mikey.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72667 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You are a fundie for the Darwin crowd.
Lets i forget, it is the Darwin crowd that lacks the fact in Evolution debate. Waoh!
What "debate" is that? There is none. The scientific community seem to be blissfully unaware of it.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72668 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Dreaming again!!!
Oh, you won't be saying that when you have to spend eternity washing all the cups and glasses for all those blessed who drink from the Holy Beer Volcano.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72669 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Narrow!
Some Budhist sect see him as a god through the supreme God.
There may be a sect which does something along those lines, but it's not the usual for Buddhism.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72670 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text>Microsoft is man made, yes or no?
Even the founder knows that there is God.
And here I thought Bill Gates was an atheist.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72671 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text>You are the dishonest one here. No evidence to date, disproving God.
All christians worldwide will never agree with you that, God does not exist.
I'm not being dishonest. I have not claimed to disprove God, never have, never will. Reason? Because it's a non-falsifiable, and therefore non-scientific concept. I've also never claimed that Christians say that God does not exist.

There are only two possibilities here: either you have difficulty in understanding what I am saying, or you're just another typical fundie liar for Jesus.

Not that it makes any difference to me which one you are.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72672 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Evidence?
To date, none of you have it.
I do not subscribe to guesses and projections.
I have it for my position. And you can only dismiss it, not address it. Again, that ain't my problem.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#72673 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually it's only "self-evident" to biased observers. Otherwise you'd be able to demonstrate your "self-evident" claims in an objective manner via the scientific method.
You can't.
That doesn't necessarily mean you're incorrect. It only means you're bullshitting everyone when you claim it's "self-evident".
But we all know how fundies do love to ignore the 9th Commandment.
So if you found ...lets say an alien computer on mars....you would assume that it was a natural phenomena because there was no aliens around? Your argument would be that it is a natural phenomena based on lack of evidence of aliens who built it. Complexity of design makes it self evident.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72674 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Good!
Now tell me what brought about the particle?
Or simply, how did the particle came? What brought it?
There was no cause. The reason being there is no particular event that precedes it to cause the phenomena. This is normal in quantum physics, though it is counter-intuitive. But there's no violation of energy conservation laws as the positive particle is counter-balanced by the negative. So far all scientific research demonstrates quantum physics to be correct.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Funny!! Word association game. (Nov '13) 14 min toad4754 2,183
Word association (Jun '07) 16 min toad4754 2,650
Leg lamp stolen from New York store's display 16 min beatlesinafog 14
Why are all the phagues posting tonight? 16 min Whatta Samhole 0
Last Post Wins! (Aug '08) 19 min toad4754 138,398
3 Word Advice (Good or Bad) 22 min toad4754 307
Post "any three words" (Sep '12) 23 min toad4754 1,123
6 letter word ...change one letter game (Oct '08) 1 hr andet1987 26,753
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 2 hr BLOODY__FATALITY 25,838
how to forget a person u love but has hurt u? (Apr '11) 4 hr Sublime1 292
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 5 hr ms_Sweeter 152,750
7 Teens Come Home Pregnant From School Trip 6 hr Rick Santpornum 73
More from around the web