Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#72258 Jan 26, 2013
God Himself wrote:
<quoted text>
Youre thinking too small.
You are in the presence of infinite power and infinite knowledge and all you can think about is facking?
Did you not describe what 'reproduction' is? What gave birth to the universe?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72259 Jan 26, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Subjective classification of similarities made up by science, does not make humans ape, no more than it makes him a fish, if you believed that humans evolved from fish.
Actually it does, because they are NOT subjective. They ARE arbitrary, but that's not quite the same thing. Humans like to pigeon-hole ideas, and that is done by coming up with a single or group of agreed upon definitions. If something then matches those definitions it is therefore considered to belong to that pigeon hole.

The modern biological classification system is based upon the work of Carl Linnaeus, who could be considered something of a creationist. And it was him who pointed out that humans are apes. He got a letter of a bunch of religious nuts who weren't happy about humans being placed in the great ape category. He responded by saying he was no more happy about it than they were, but asked them to give a valid scientific (not religious) reason to not include them in the same group.

He got no response.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#72260 Jan 26, 2013
God Himself wrote:
<quoted text>
Youre thinking too small.
You are in the presence of infinite power and infinite knowledge and all you can think about is facking?
why do Islamic people believe in 72 virgins in paradise?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72261 Jan 26, 2013
Adam and Steve wrote:
<quoted text>2 questions: 1) Are humans alone in the universe or is there an advanced race out there. 2) Is the God/Jesus story true or a fable?
1 - Currently unknown.

2 - Currently unknown, although there are certain claims which are fables. Such as global floods, talking lizards and donkeys, and flat Earth.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72262 Jan 26, 2013
God Himself wrote:
<quoted text>
You suffering from foot-in-mouth disease.
If "ALL concepts are the result of brain chemistry", then scientific conceptions are no more valid than mythology as such.
Sure.

Like gravity.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#72263 Jan 26, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
People "like me?" What are you implying? Also, you fail at English, you really fail at it. You should learn what words mean before using them.
You are incorrigible.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72264 Jan 26, 2013
God Himself wrote:
<quoted text>
What I have seen does not identify a cause of evolution.
I have seen an "If you have variation, differential reproduction, and heredity, you will have evolution by natural selection as an outcome. It is as simple as that.".
But thats horsesh!t.
To say "If you have variation, differential reproduction, and heredity, you will have evolution...", is not different from saying "if you have reproduction you will have evolution".
It is not different because production in itself involves "variation, differential reproduction, and heredity".
All they have accomplished is a redefinition of natural processes to suit their view of the natural world.
It's only horseshit because you find it theologically inconvenient. All of those mechanisms are observed. All of them will naturally produce slightly different offspring in subsequent generations. If life gradually changes over time (as is scientifically observed) we will end up with evolution. It's not simply saying "reproduction therefore evolution", it's pointing out that "reproduction provides variation, differential reproduction, and heredity, BECAUSE these are observed. Ergo we will end up with evolution".

You can of course PREVENT evolution from happening by placing a barrier, such as the Earth being say, oh, about 6,000 years old? But then that would simply be arguing against reality. Which is why so many creationists find Young Earth dogma appealing.

So you claim we can have:

1+1
1+1+1
1+1+1+1
1+1+1+1+1
1+1+1+1+1+1

But we CAN'T have:

1+1+1+1+1+1+1

Which is absurd. The fact is is changes accumulate over time (and they do) we will eventually get something that is very different than was there a long time ago. The mechanisms are not in dispute, not even by other creationists (hence the love of YECism). But not only are the mechanisms not in dispute, but neither is the evidence I provided you with yesterday, which unequivocally demonstrates evolution via common descent.

Correction: it IS in dispute, but ONLY by those who promote invisible Jewish magic, and the occasional crank. But the ONLY disputes in the scientific community is NOT whether or not evolution actually occurred, but HOW it occurred. And such debate is normal for any valid scientific theory. There has been no genuine dispute over the validity of evolution since the discovery of DNA back in the 1950's at the very latest.

The fact there are incredulous people with no science education object to science has no bearing on the scientific validity of scientific theories.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72265 Jan 26, 2013
God Himself wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, just like in all the other universe you created right?
You clown.
Whatever happened once life begins is a continuation of what was happening before life began.
Evolution is a continuation of chemistry. You are a walking talking bag of chemicals. Chemistry is a continuation of physics, which has been around since the earliest stages of the universe. However while you may like running headlong into the infinite regression fallacy, it has no bearing on the validity of evolution. All it needs is for life to be here. Life IS here. Life evolves. Facts. In order to demonstrate otherwise, you need to demonstrate that life is in fact NOT here.

And evolution doesn't care whether it's an extension of natural processes of the universe or if it was suddenly magically poofed into being by an invisible magical Jewish wizard. We got the mechanisms, we got the processes, we got the evidence, we got life.
God Himself wrote:
So until you can say that evolution was a real phenomena before the beginning of time, I wont have you tell me it began any time after time.
Furthermore, you have no knowledge of what happened when life began.
The theory of evolution does not rely on abiogenesis. For the EXACT same reason the theory of gravity does not rely on the origin of mass, nor the germ theory of disease rely on the origin of germs.

All three scientific theories work and are based on observable evidence.
God Himself wrote:
All you they is mere speculation which hangs on THE LOGIC in their arguments, which we are gradually beginning to discover is absent.
Furthermore, didnt you hear that all concepts are influenced by brain chemistry?
Ask "The Dude".
All you have evidence of is the chemical process in your brain. Period.
All abstract concepts are stored in the brain as brain states, made possible by chemistry. Do you accept this? If not then what's your alternative? If you do happen to accept reality in this instance, how does this necessarily invalidate those concepts?

Just because the theory of gravity is an abstract concept within someone's mind does NOT necessarily mean it's incorrect.
The Pencil Dick

Kingston, Jamaica

#72267 Jan 26, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you not describe what 'reproduction' is? What gave birth to the universe?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!

LOL!!!!!!!!!!

I get it: WHAT IS A "BIG-BANG"?!!

I really like you; youre fun :)

“This is the other side”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#72268 Jan 26, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Just because there's a television show saying that this myth is real, doesn't make it true, your Jesus is still a myth.
It was on the HISTORY CHANNEL for God's sake...it's a science show!LMAO

( or maybe it was the Discovery Channel or Nova, I can't remember...but the point is it was on one of the major science channels)

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72270 Jan 26, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Just because there's a television show saying that this myth is real, doesn't make it true, your Jesus is still a myth.
You are wrong. This is just a Jewish conspiracy. Jesus existed.
Find out the work of Pliny the younger and others.
Pliny the younger was from the blood line of Pliny the elder, who witnessed Jesus.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72271 Jan 26, 2013
God Himself wrote:
<quoted text>
All you are doing is redefining reproduction from the viewpoint of evolution, as such.
Not really. Because unless reproduction does NOT involve those other phenomena discussed in our previous post then there is nothing to prevent evolution. Now, if we were all born clones then maybe you'd have a point.

But we aren't.

So you don't.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72272 Jan 26, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
2 answers:
1. We don't know if there is ANY other intelligence out there; advanced or otherwise.
2. The God/Jesus story is almost surely a fable/myth. Science is able to disprove a lot of it nowadays.
It still can't falsify (a) God.

This isn't a bad thing, as it only means the concept is non-falsifiable, therefore not scientific. The Flying Spaghetti Monster is just as valid.

“This is the other side”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#72273 Jan 26, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean "sole". And it maybe. But then you have no idea that dolphins and whales don't have complex languages capable of communicating ideas like religion.
<quoted text>
Um, no. Evolution is certainly not dependent on the development of the ability to conceive abstract concepts. Evolution is dependent upon biological factors, and those have already long been demonstrated. You may think "religiosity" is all important but it simply is not the case. Keep in mind that religion could easily be equated with fictional stories (since no religion can be demonstrated valid) and your argument would be exactly the same as saying evolution can't explain Hollywood movies therefore evolution is invalid. It's a dumb argument.(shrug)
For someone who cannot even see a simple pun as soul/sole...lol...no wonder you can't see an inch past your own dogma.lol
God Himself

Kingston, Jamaica

#72274 Jan 26, 2013
Cybele wrote:
why do Islamic people believe in 72 virgins in paradise?
The 72 virgins is actually more of an esoteric principle that a number of literal virgins. Many Muslims dont know that and they never will.

The number 72 is of great significance when dealing with Semitic philosophies of religion and spirituality.

72 represents the number of specific influences through which God's action/influence over all creation.

Islam came out of Judaism (Muhammed was a Hebrew/Jew at one time, but got fed up and decided to find God for himself).

So if you want to understand the significance of the number 72, you may have to search about:

"The 72 Names/Attributes of God".

But essentially, to see the 72 attributes as virgins which one will receive, represents the idea that one will "become one" with the powers of God.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72275 Jan 26, 2013
God Himself wrote:
<quoted text>
What lies?
If you want a WORKING/FUNCTIONAL knowledge the universe and whats in it; refer to science.
If you require the TRUTH about the nature of the universe; think critically about it.
Science can provide effective knowledge; but only logic and a will to know can lead you to truth.
As much as it may seem that religious individuals, not unlike myself here are anti-science; we are not.
We just know that in order for something to be absolutely true, it must be eternal.
But since there is no eternally enduring form nor substance in the universe; the only way one can ascertain the absolute (truth) is by logic.
How very Aristotelian.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72276 Jan 26, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> What was the action that led God to do that?
The people then did abominable things in the sight of God.
No time to explain to a sceptic.
Therefore he killed them on purpose. Meaning your claim "He didn't mean to kill anybody!" was complete bullshite.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#72277 Jan 26, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Address the point.
If you have a sincere answer to that question( non human to human) show it.
I HAVE addressed it. You've never addressed mine.

Don't worry, neither has any other fundie.(shrug)

“That's just MY opinion...”

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#72278 Jan 26, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
So if that be the case, why did I see a program on the history channel that's was tracing the lineage of Jesus?
Was that about the time of the program on the History Channel about Ancient Aliens?
God Himself

Kingston, Jamaica

#72279 Jan 26, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure.
Like gravity.
Do you now see the implications of your idea that "ALL concepts are the result of brain chemistry" (or something to that effect)?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weird Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
" Tell me a secret"...... 6 min Whatja got PH 247
Word Association 2 (Sep '13) 6 min Jessie75 6,354
Obama's Legacy "STINKS!" 12 min If your that Stupid 1
True or False Game 13 min Vector aka Victor... 379
Funny!! Word association game. (Nov '13) 15 min beatlesinthebog 1,878
Who are some of your favorite people on the off... (Dec '13) 15 min Princess Hey 90
NFL Football (Jul '10) 15 min Go Blue Forever 1,645
What are you thinking about now? (Jun '10) 20 min beatlesinthebog 22,217
What song are you listening to right now? (Apr '08) 55 min Tom2Tone 148,958
During Obama's Speech at Democratic Campaign Ra... 1 hr liam cul8r 20
Do you have a Topix crush? (Jun '11) 3 hr Juju Beans 6,829

Weird People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE